Maura Murray

Judged:

4

4

4

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
it is everything the family representatives have brought forward right here to topix. and you read it, and then deny responsibility for allowing it to continue, day after day, year after year.
you have no decency, then. none.
your dismissive, robotic statements have no value, no heart, no intelligence, and no meaning.
citigirl, you suck.

Judged:

3

1

1

dolphinhouse wrote:

<quoted text>
rhetorical...are you seriously suggesting that no criminal has ever taken advantage of a a stranded woman? no doubt you think tht nothing like that would ever happen in, say, St Johnsbury?

Judged:

3

3

2

Shack wrote:

I don't care who is who..all I care about is finding out what happened to Maura. Grouchy people can continue to be grouchy to each other.
What difference does it make if people want to write under different names. This Forum for exchanging thoughts and opinions. Even when a Truth appears, some won't/don't want to believe it.
One truth was/is that LE DID advise a man to remove himself and his metal detector from the edge of 112, where Maura disappeared. Some of you will turn that into a lie. Some of you will still blame the victim too.
Remember Maura Murray....

Judged:

6

5

5

Observer wrote:

<quoted text>
In common like what? You agree that JWB has cracked his crock? Stop talking to yourself and let's talk about Maura. I think she ran from her troubles and met up with foul play. Maybe a nice man in a red truck who happened to be friends with a certain officer of the law who's no longer in charge.....

Judged:

4

4

3

Lincolnite wrote:

<quoted text>Since you're speaking about the truth I have a couple of questions for you. Is it true what I read in another forum about you saying… <snip snip>

Judged:

1

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm in agreement with you about who cares about who is who.
I'm not sure if we can clarify what a "truth" is. Is there a written record of it, did the person get a ticket? What can forums actually count as certifying information to be truthful.
Take the AFRAME house. I have been trying to show logically how that there is no way it had anything to do with the case. How come family or people in the know come out and say that it wasn't MM DNA on the carpet. Instead we get answer to the question " Never tested, but human blood"
When people don't come out and clear these things up it is harder to believe other information that floats its way in. I'm not trying to be rude, but that is just my perspective. If people came out in 2006 and said the AFRAME probably is irrelevant that I would be more open.

Judged:

3

3

2

FrmLE wrote:

Healy's theories in this case are absolutely ridiculous, in my opinion. Not a single thing he has said has any little bit of proof whatsoever, without exception. None of it makes sense based on the facts of the case.
Not to mention he has never seen the case file, nor has he done any serious independant investigation into the case. I would be interested to have jwb post what investigation Healy has done and what evidence he has discovered on which he bases his theories.
I give his opinion no weight whatsoever.

Judged:

3

3

2

jldross wrote:

<quoted text>
Im not trying to be rude either but the information of the aframe house is confusing.
If the carpet was turned to police for testing it is logical no results are released on if it was or wasn't Maura. But if DNA evidence is found then the home becomes a crime scene. You are saying that never happened, correct?
Then there is the half the PI took. A volunteer PI team tested for blood but not for DNA, is that right?

Judged:

3

3

3

GrampaMo wrote:

<quoted text>
Man you really need to get a life or some help or both. Wow

Judged:

3

3

3

GrampaMo wrote:

<quoted text>
Do I sound upset or disturbed? I thought I gave a rational reply.
Keep threatening posters to bring up crap from years ago. At least we know now that you'll go to any length to prove your point whether it's right or wrong.
Show me where anyone has left because of me.

Judged:

5

5

4

jldross wrote:

<quoted text>
If Healy's independent investigation led to evidence that the "prominent family" member who sbd was afraid of killed Maura and buried her in their concrete driveway, then wouldn't that evidence be probable cause for a search warrant to dig up the driveway?

Judged:

5

4

4

whiston wrote:

Hi all.Michael Jaques was arrested for not reporting his employment.Mauras boyfriend ,not family,was given the contents from the saturn.I assume chief WILLIAMS was calling all the s before the real police got involved.It has bothered me from day one that a search warrant would be requested for an abandoned car.Where the hell is Claude Moulton last I heard he wanted Roo back.take care philip

Judged:

2

2

1

mcsmom wrote:

I would assume Godfrey was not considered to be in connection to Maura, as not sort of plea deal seems to have been on the table regarding his sentencing.

Judged:

5

4

1

dll wrote:

<quoted text>mcsmom - Normally I would agree with this. However this was a landmark case for VT. Howard Dean signed the Bill in 2000 & there still was a great deal of controvercy when Godfrey went to trial. They had to fight to keep the DNA evidence in. Keeping the DNA evidence and getting the conviction was their main focus. Add to that the fact Mr & Mrs Scoville had worked hard to make this possible. Not what the reaction to a plea deal would have been under the circumstances. Attached link to Stowe Reporter.
http://www.stowetoday.com/stowereporter/archi...
Do you or anyone else know if there was ever a discription of the vehicle that went off the rd earlier where the occupant left in a private vehicle? And/or a discription fo the private vehicle the occupant left in?

Judged:

5

5

4

Bumping for Maura wrote:

<quoted text>
dll,
As for your question I´ve never seen any reference whatsoever to any kind of description of the vehicle/vehicles involved in the purported "first accident".
I´ve been following this case on Topix and elsewhere for a number of years, so I believe my recollection is correct on this point.
Otherwise, I´m sure others will be chiming in to correct me.

Judged:

3

2

1

dll wrote:

<quoted text>mcsmom - Normally I would agree with this. However this was a landmark case for VT. Howard Dean signed the Bill in 2000 & there still was a great deal of controvercy when Godfrey went to trial. They had to fight to keep the DNA evidence in. Keeping the DNA evidence and getting the conviction was their main focus. Add to that the fact Mr & Mrs Scoville had worked hard to make this possible. Not what the reaction to a plea deal would have been under the circumstances. Attached link to Stowe Reporter.
http://www.stowetoday.com/stowereporter/archi...
Do you or anyone else know if there was ever a discription of the vehicle that went off the rd earlier where the occupant left in a private vehicle? And/or a discription fo the private vehicle the occupant left in?