Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

hannah_b wrote:

Having doing some googling, I found out MM cell phone was a Sprint Samsung SPH-A620.
Sprint reportedly doesn´t take sim cards, they use CDMA technology, where your information is stored directly onto the phone itself.
So, poster and friend could have checked to see if it was a Samsung A620 and if it had a sim card. No Samsung A620 = not MM phone and sim card in place = not MM phone.

BobJenkins-OG wrote:

At 4:30 she was probably in about Brattleboro, nowhere near Londonderry.
So this alleged 'Londonderry ping' would definitely be dealing with someone calling her, from the i93 area of southern NH, nowhere near where maura could've been on her trip up north besides, in the affidavit it specifically states it is trying to find the number who called Maura's phone.
The bigger question is whether or not the document is real. The topix poster 'dawn' made a strong case for it being fake, but she was also an anonymous poster and to believe her you would have take her word on a few things.
I tend to lean towards believing renner that the document is real due to him being a journalist that has his name and reputation on the line.
So what's the consensus? Seems like most people think the Londonderry doc is real.
As for her last call I thought the last call she made was to her own phone checking her messages not to her dorm, but either way it was to check her messages, afaik.

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Do you know anything about your friends book? Do you think the tower will have its own chapter?

BobJenkins-OG wrote:

What was the fact that you believe the investigators flubbed? I'm not sure what you mean.
They were clearly trying to find a number that tried to call INTO her phone, this was not a call from her phone they were looking into.
They had already known all her outgoing calls and her own cell phone pings within the first week of the investigation, there would be no need for any affidavit searching for that info

Judged:

4

4

3

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Read my post again. I didnt care to check because I thought your story made
No sense. I didn't want to give you the satisfaction that I wasted time from your bs.
Now after all your bs and your deep jabs at LE not being interested it seems the found you found didn't even match her make or model. I wonder how fm would feel if he organized a search party to find a phone that had nothing to do with the case.
Two years you had to review to see if it was the proper phone before entering this useless data onto a forum of a missing girl. You claim to be intelligent and I believe you are, so why didn't you check this info out before raising people's hopes up about finding the right phone?

Judged:

1

1

Emmett Dove wrote:

She could have left at 3:31 or 3:29 or 3:37 etc.. 3:30 is a guess not a proven fact lol..
My daughter loves Orko & Cringer btw.. everywhere Okro goes so does Cringer..

Orko Kringer wrote:

<quoted text>
It is a guess but an official guess and the 3:40 time is time-stamped sort of speak as would be the 4:37 cell phone call to herself.
And what realy burns by bum ... Is that all these years I have had the handle Orko Kringer, but I just recently found out that for all these years I have been spelling Kringer wrong.... Oh Well, I was actually a Cyclops fan myself from the show,(always felt the one-eye fella got the shaft and he wanted to be a good guy).

Emmett Dove wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand.. I was just tryna lighten some tension ya know? All them fake clues over the weekend had all kinds of people irritated but for the most part I beleive everythin uve posted..
& yea that cyclops was funny in some of the shows I actually watched all the way through.. He atleast tried & I think maybe that was the morale of the show.. I dunno, but if I asked my daughther shed be glad to tell me all about them all night lol...

Judged:

1

1

1

BobJenkins-OG wrote:

Wowzer- you hunt don't you? I take it you probably know a lot of hunters in the area?
A fairly high percentage of the people up there hunt, like all 5 or 6 people I know that live in woodsville/ n Haverhill area all hunt. Including the girls.
Have you ever hunted anywhere in the forest between the WB curve and north Woodstock?
Would you agree that is a popular place for hunting?
As far as I've always been concerned that is not the kind of area you go hiking for fun in the fall time, that is more of a hunting area than a recreational hiking area. No real hiking trails, too many hunters. You'd better be wearing orange. All just forest. Perfect hunting grounds. When you drive down 112 during hunting season you'll see many trucks parked along the road, mostly in the fire road turn offs that are gated, people walk in from there.
I'm not a hunter but I bet it's great hunting in there. I know that my old roommate who's from woodsville used to go hunting in that area ever year with his grandfather who's a woodsville native, they always got deer too. My freezer was full of venison.
I'm just wondering if you would agree that area of 112 between the WB curve, well really a few miles up the the rd from there, to north Woodstock is a very popular hunting ground?
What about on the other side of the rd. this side with the river on it? Do people hunt that side too or is it not as easy to access?