Maura Murray

Shack wrote:

Jenkins, you spoke earlier about "publicity'. I was in Woodsville that night of Feb. 9, 2004.(Yes, I have written this before) I was visiting my parents. I worked part-time so I was up there a lot. That night, because my parents hated my smoking, I was on their porch. There was a full moon, which I love. Their residence was within view of the Cottage Hospital. I heard no sirens nor did I see any flashing police cars.
Because my parents and I have subscriptions to the local newspaper..."Journal Opinion" I was amazed that I knew NOTHING about Maura Murray Missing until the Spring of 2005. The only JO newspaper article, that I am aware of was in Feb 2008.
Why wouldn a local newspaper NOT write about MMM?

What were you wearing? What brand of cigarettes were you smoking? Where you wearing slippers or socks? How long were you outside?

BoJenkins wrote:
"The whole 'moved on' comment really makes no sense. According to orky they're talking about the girl who's jacket Maura returned the day she went missing.
The whole thing about the moved on comment is if they knew the person moved on, then they knew who the person was. If they knew who the person was then I'm sure they could've gotten ahold of them if they felt the need. Obviously if they thought this person possibly had anything to do with her dissapearance or had any info pertaining to her dissapearance they would've talked to them. That comment to me looks like a lame excuse for not following up on somethIng. I'm sure they had a good reason for not feeling the need to follow up with this person."

Re: the above
Look at what you've written..."I'm sure they could've" and "they would've talked to them".... Now recall it was Mrs. R who had actually phoned the number on Maura's cell phone statement and discovered that it belonged to Mr & Mrs S. No one investigating the case had phoned the couple during that several-month period following Maura's disappearance. So assumptions are feathers in the wind. In my opinion, assumptions and conclusions have been a big part of why this case remains a mystery. Take nothing for granted not assuming anything is the best policy. Like the old saying keep "A mind that is open to everything and attached to nothing." Assumptions are often very misleading.

Shack wrote:

Jenkins, you spoke earlier about "publicity'. I was in Woodsville that night of Feb. 9, 2004.(Yes, I have written this before) I was visiting my parents. I worked part-time so I was up there a lot. That night, because my parents hated my smoking, I was on their porch. There was a full moon, which I love. Their residence was within view of the Cottage Hospital. I heard no sirens nor did I see any flashing police cars.
Because my parents and I have subscriptions to the local newspaper..."Journal Opinion" I was amazed that I knew NOTHING about Maura Murray Missing until the Spring of 2005. The only JO newspaper article, that I am aware of was in Feb 2008.
Why wouldn a local newspaper NOT write about MMM?

You did not read newspapers or listen to news broadcasts? You did not notice posters w/her picture plastered all over the place? You did not notice her photo and the many discussions regarding her disappearance on several websites? Were you smoking cigarettes or something else? People several states away knew of her disappearance.

OKAY wrote:

As for the misinformation, bias and fantasy your talking about you, bill, frmLE wowzer correct?~ Jenky
gotta love Jenky. haven't ever run across his way of thinking before.
no, wasn't referring to Bill, Wowzer or FrMer LE. nor do my posts reveal me to be a hypocrite.
you had quite a session on Topix last nite. fascinating content!{sarcasm}

I find it a little dsturbing that a grown man that claims to be a federal agent stays up all night ranting about a missing woman he never knew or met.

Still going on and on about NOTHING.....but it seems that is what keeps up the momentum to keep the windmill moving.

2 of the officers (1 Haverhill & 1 NHSP) working the night of Feb. 9th 2004 when Maura went missing now work for Franconia NH PD. Come on down and talk to these guys. Has that ever been done before.? Maybe Monaghan or Cashin will talk to You about that night and You will have new info to post.

Give it a try Sleuths.!

From Hanson Express

"Just before 1 p.m. she called Dominic and Linda Salamone, a couple who own a rental condominium at the Seasons at Attitash Resort in Bartlett, New Hampshire. Maura's family, which frequented the Bartlett area, had stayed at the Seasons, though never at this condominium."

RE
Maura's phone call to Wakefield MA and then later the same day, a ping off the cell phone tower at Londonderry. A connection? Someone returning her call? Follow-up to a vm? Maura was very personable and always introduced herself. I recall that email note of hers a few years earlier (the note in which she introduced herself and spoke about JJ Campground and how she loved moose stories. It was strange that she disclosed so little in her phone inquiry about the condo. This is why there might have been a remote chance that possibly she'd left a vm and someone had later returned her phone call. Maura often had some kind of little story, something that made people remember her. I cannot believe she would call to inquire about that condo without having mentioned that she and her family had stayed at that resort before and other information about herself. This is why I wonder whether that ping on the Londonderry cell tower might have been a follow-up call to Maura, from a cell phone. Believe Maura had made the phone call to inquire about the condo approx 12:55/1:00 p.m. Will check on time the cell phone ping occurred at Londonderry.

I've always had a hard time thinking LE didn't check her last phone calls. Just doesn't make sense. Maybe with the Landry affidavit they found that Salamones called her cell back in the late afternoon on the 9th... Wakefield to Londonderry could have been the ping, suggesting that the role of the Salamone call didn't matter to what they already knew at that point. JMO.

Aftermath wrote:

From Hanson Express
"Just before 1 p.m. she called Dominic and Linda Salamone, a couple who own a rental condominium at the Seasons at Attitash Resort in Bartlett, New Hampshire. Maura's family, which frequented the Bartlett area, had stayed at the Seasons, though never at this condominium."
RE
Maura's phone call to Wakefield MA and then later the same day, a ping off the cell phone tower at Londonderry. A connection? Someone returning her call? Follow-up to a vm? Maura was very personable and always introduced herself. I recall that email note of hers a few years earlier (the note in which she introduced herself and spoke about JJ Campground and how she loved moose stories. It was strange that she disclosed so little in her phone inquiry about the condo. This is why there might have been a remote chance that possibly she'd left a vm and someone had later returned her phone call. Maura often had some kind of little story, something that made people remember her. I cannot believe she would call to inquire about that condo without having mentioned that she and her family had stayed at that resort before and other information about herself. This is why I wonder whether that ping on the Londonderry cell tower might have been a follow-up call to Maura, from a cell phone. Believe Maura had made the phone call to inquire about the condo approx 12:55/1:00 p.m. Will check on time the cell phone ping occurred at Londonderry.

Aftermath:
We are thinking along the same lines, I posted the above before I read your previous post.

Aftermath wrote:

From Hanson Express
"Just before 1 p.m. she called Dominic and Linda Salamone, a couple who own a rental condominium at the Seasons at Attitash Resort in Bartlett, New Hampshire. Maura's family, which frequented the Bartlett area, had stayed at the Seasons, though never at this condominium."
RE
Maura's phone call to Wakefield MA and then later the same day, a ping off the cell phone tower at Londonderry. A connection? Someone returning her call? Follow-up to a vm? Maura was very personable and always introduced herself. I recall that email note of hers a few years earlier (the note in which she introduced herself and spoke about JJ Campground and how she loved moose stories. It was strange that she disclosed so little in her phone inquiry about the condo. This is why there might have been a remote chance that possibly she'd left a vm and someone had later returned her phone call. Maura often had some kind of little story, something that made people remember her. I cannot believe she would call to inquire about that condo without having mentioned that she and her family had stayed at that resort before and other information about herself. This is why I wonder whether that ping on the Londonderry cell tower might have been a follow-up call to Maura, from a cell phone. Believe Maura had made the phone call to inquire about the condo approx 12:55/1:00 p.m. Will check on time the cell phone ping occurred at Londonderry.

Good point Aftermath about the ping. My recollection however to the Salamone call was it was a 3 min call. I am just pulling that out of memory and could be wrong on that.

How would she know the Salamones had a condo for rent at attitash is what I find interesting and how did she get the number? Currently there is a web site where you can rent rooms online or there is a number top call (603). There are generally real estate agencies that are involved with condo rentals. Some private owners rent on their own so they don't have to pay the real estate agents. The private owner in that case would advertise by word of mouth, advertise in newspaper or online.

Just because the salamones maybe called maura back doesn't mean that LE still shouldn't have called the Salamones and interviewed them. LE had no idea that the salamones owned a condo in Bartlet and that is what Maura called about ( so they say).

Maybe Maura was calling someone else at the Salamone residence ( son daughter etc...?)

As far as Monaghan answering questions bout that night, he alteady did that a long time ago. He just prefaced the questions saying he wouldnt answer any about the time of the accident/disappearance. I always found it interesting that Chief Williams also refused to answer SRs more pointed questions bout the discrepancy in times reported........just sayin...

mcsmom wrote:

I've always had a hard time thinking LE didn't check her last phone calls. Just doesn't make sense. Maybe with the Landry affidavit they found that Salamones called her cell back in the late afternoon on the 9th... Wakefield to Londonderry could have been the ping, suggesting that the role of the Salamone call didn't matter to what they already knew at that point. JMO.

I'm thinking that LE already knew where MM was going, where she intended to stay, and why she was leaving. To speak with Salamones wouldn't be needed.

off topic but his is too funny:

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/06/15...

Really Lighthouse that is a very weak response.

One of the very first things to do would be to interview and check phone records. Do you really think they saw the Salamones number and said"Hey thats the Salamones number . We know that maura didn't go to teir Condo in Bartlett so lets not call them".? Seriously doubt it- think about what you posted.

On the other hand , maybe SBD did tip them off to a local person and so LE decided that the call had nothing to do with anything. That to me makes more sense.

Lady Gray wrote:

As far as Monaghan answering questions bout that night, he alteady did that a long time ago. He just prefaced the questions saying he wouldnt answer any about the time of the accident/disappearance. I always found it interesting that Chief Williams also refused to answer SRs more pointed questions bout the discrepancy in times reported........just sayin...

Yes, Maribeth Conway requested an interview as well. I don't think Scarinza ever got back to her regarding this.

Where she was pss staying had nothing to do not checking into te Solomons Call. LE didn't know who they were from a hole in the wall exept that they lived in Wakefield Mass.

If they know someone locally was involved but can't yet prove it the the salamone call was probably nothing of use to them. I would think a hasty search would mean to dt all the (i's) unless they were pretty sure of something else.

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
Good point Aftermath about the ping. My recollection however to the Salamone call was it was a 3 min call. I am just pulling that out of memory and could be wrong on that.
How would she know the Salamones had a condo for rent at attitash is what I find interesting and how did she get the number? Currently there is a web site where you can rent rooms online or there is a number top call (603). There are generally real estate agencies that are involved with condo rentals. Some private owners rent on their own so they don't have to pay the real estate agents. The private owner in that case would advertise by word of mouth, advertise in newspaper or online.

I googled the condos back in '05, and a number for DS came up, it was a Hanson exchange.

"Possibly staying"

Please Santa New Keyboard

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
I googled the condos back in '05, and a number for DS came up, it was a Hanson exchange.

ah interesting MCSMOM. Thank you for that. that really helps answer that question I had.

Maura must have also searched on her computer regarding the "Seasons". Thank you MCSMOM awesome help on that.

Hanson Exchange is interesting