Maura Murray

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
I am not familiar with it Amy but I believe it is located in Warren. I could be wrong.

It is located on French pond rd. in Haverhill/woodsville. I attended that search.

JWB and Tang,

Thanks. I am wondering if anything came of it.

Going through old articles looking for something else and found this:

"Dad won't give up on the search"
By NANCY WEST
New Hampshire Union Leader
Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2007
"A few weeks ago, he tracked down tips that Maura had been murdered
and her body parts buried in a sand pit.
"It makes me pretty mad. This involves the same people who are my
chief suspects and the cops say,'We looked into that,' but I don't
know what that means," Murray said."

wow! the real Amy's email group which, previously explored old documents and sleuthed about MM,(not other posters), did not subject the old guard to the tedious monotony of discovery.
true research isn't regurgitating someone else's collection of documents from another site.
brain trust at work.
i mean jokers at scool.
guidance from divine psychics.
it's nearly time to explain hypothermia....again.

Brian L. Rooney, convicted of abducting and murdering a 21-year-old co-ed in Burlington VT in October 2006, has a sordid past.

“… witnesses accuse Rooney of using chemical-soaked rags or other substances to render victims unconscious and unable to resist his sexual advances.”

"Rooney is (also) charged with lewd and lascivious conduct with a child (12), accused of fondling her in 1996 while in St. Johnsbury."

"Rooney's ex-wife, identified only by initials in the affidavit, obtained a restraining order against him in April 2000, according to the affidavit. She accused him of drugging her "many times so he could rape her.”“

More here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-2096984.h...

Snowy wrote:

wow! the real Amy's email group which, previously explored old documents and sleuthed about MM,(not other posters), did not subject the old guard to the tedious monotony of discovery.
true research isn't regurgitating someone else's collection of documents from another site.
brain trust at work.
i mean jokers at scool.
guidance from divine psychics.
it's nearly time to explain hypothermia....again.

Hearing Dr. Godwin's name again is like nails on a chalkboard. That's been rammed down our throats for years, still no answers. EWB probably has a google alert on him, I'm sure she'll pop in soon to add her knowledge on all things Dr Godwin.

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
Hearing Dr. Godwin's name again is like nails on a chalkboard. That's been rammed down our throats for years, still no answers. EWB probably has a google alert on him, I'm sure she'll pop in soon to add her knowledge on all things Dr Godwin.

OMG - cuckoo house.
sashhhh! this is the library...and important reseach is taking place.
i mean...rewind, regurg and relive.

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
Hearing Dr. Godwin's name again is like nails on a chalkboard. That's been rammed down our throats for years, still no answers. EWB probably has a google alert on him, I'm sure she'll pop in soon to add her knowledge on all things Dr Godwin.

That's not nails on a chalk board you are hearing. It's that whooshing sound. Along with the totally useless searches, rag, car pushing, "mystery vehicles", etc. I have tears in my eyes from laughing so hard. I do feel bad for those being sucked in though. They could be doing far more constructive things like making taffy or just about anything else.

I should point out that one of the people here I respect acknowledged that I do contribute things of worth. I like it when people do some of their own research, in this case Amy. Unlike some others here, I don't need to retract or completely change what I have written the first time, or the first correction or the second correction or third correction. It has has been verified (more than once) that when I say something, it is usually found out to be correct. I usually don't speak, unless I know what the answer is. I would find it hard to show up again if I was continually, repeatedly, consistently found to be full of crap. Others seem to have less of a problem with that.

Again, this is a free country. How you waste your time is entirely up to you. Me, I'm just here for the entertainment and to feel the breeze.

Bill

Frostman wrote:

Brian L. Rooney, convicted of abducting and murdering a 21-year-old co-ed in Burlington VT in October 2006, has a sordid past.
“… witnesses accuse Rooney of using chemical-soaked rags or other substances to render victims unconscious and unable to resist his sexual advances.”
"Rooney is (also) charged with lewd and lascivious conduct with a child (12), accused of fondling her in 1996 while in St. Johnsbury."
"Rooney's ex-wife, identified only by initials in the affidavit, obtained a restraining order against him in April 2000, according to the affidavit. She accused him of drugging her "many times so he could rape her.”“
More here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-201_162-2096984.h...

I haven't spent a lot of time reading about the specifics of Michelle's murder, but found this interesting. Scary coincidence about the rag. Another is that Michelle was believed to have borrowed his cell phone because her battery had died. Would be interesting to read some official/confirmed info on where he was in Feb 2004.

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
That's not nails on a chalk board you are hearing. It's that whooshing sound. Along with the totally useless searches, rag, car pushing, "mystery vehicles", etc. I have tears in my eyes from laughing so hard. I do feel bad for those being sucked in though. They could be doing far more constructive things like making taffy or just about anything else.
I should point out that one of the people here I respect acknowledged that I do contribute things of worth. I like it when people do some of their own research, in this case Amy. Unlike some others here, I don't need to retract or completely change what I have written the first time, or the first correction or the second correction or third correction. It has has been verified (more than once) that when I say something, it is usually found out to be correct. I usually don't speak, unless I know what the answer is. I would find it hard to show up again if I was continually, repeatedly, consistently found to be full of crap. Others seem to have less of a problem with that.
Again, this is a free country. How you waste your time is entirely up to you. Me, I'm just here for the entertainment and to feel the breeze.
Bill

Enjoy the breeze, there's a lot of hot air blowing around. Glad you did not desert us totally. You are much better at poop-patrol, than I. ;-)

is everyone Rooney-ready?
should take up some space during tonight's pow-wow-wow.

Snowy wrote:

is everyone Rooney-ready?
should take up some space during tonight's pow-wow-wow.

Please wait for me, gotta get the bowl of popcorn!

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
Definately Wowzer, with the knife, in Bill's study, with Snowy's candlestick, in the ...well you know, the hotel room.....

Oh crap! You found us out. And I thought we were so careful.

Snowy wrote:

is everyone Rooney-ready?
should take up some space during tonight's pow-wow-wow.

Been there,done that. I think doing the supper dishes will be more interesting.

Snowy wrote:

is everyone Rooney-ready?
should take up some space during tonight's pow-wow-wow.

I think they are taking Bill's advice and making taffy. Or if they were really smart, they would just start their own discussion board, so we don't have to read the continual re-wind.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh crap! You found us out. And I thought we were so careful.

Two doubles or a king?

For whoever asked (maybe Ridiculous)if you can beat a dead horse more than once the answer is YES.
As we've all seen here a dead horse can be beat to death a second time, buried and the carcass dug up and beat all over again. There's less to beat each time though and the sticks keep getting smaller.
I think toothpicks were used in the last beating.
Hope I was of some help answering this question.

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
I think they are taking Bill's advice and making taffy. Or if they were really smart, they would just start their own discussion board, so we don't have to read the continual re-wind.

Now that's a dandy idea. They can start over from the very beginning and go over each and every theory, opinion, lie, accusation etc and chew on it all for at least the 20th time.

oo00oo wrote:

<quoted text>
Two doubles or a king?

Neither.:)

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
.:)

You are an idiot, sorry to break it to you, but you are.
This is why I invited everyone to go back and read this thread about a year ago.
When I started postin again last January I was appalled by the behavior of these posters, bill, snowy, wowzer, etc, etc. All these posters did was hurl obscenities, insults and personal attacks at other posters. If you read my posts from back then I was sticking to the topic at hand. After months of personal attacks I started attacking back, and like an idiot I still do. The fact of the matter is these posters are the rudest and just plain nastiest posters I've ever seen on any forum anywhere, it's ridiculous.
Your comment of me being the only poster here who regularly hurls insults and obscenities at other posters is just completely insane. Either you haven't read back on this thread at all, don't read some of these nasty poster's posts, or you're straight up lying. Since it seems obvious that you do read other's posts I'm gonna have to say you're lying. You and you're whole crew of weirdos are not only weirdo hypocritical trolls, you're also hardcore LIARS. It's insane how you people act on this thread.

Anyone who questions what I am saying I invite to please go back and read this thread around jan/feb of last year, and before that if you want good examples of how downright nasty these posters have ALWAYS been, since long before I started posting again.
But please, go back and read this thread, go and read the patric McCarthy thread to see what kind f people these weirdos really are.
The thing I feel stupid about is falling into their trap of personal attacks. I kept it civil as long as I could until last may when they started accusing me of making everything up. After going back and digging up all of the quotes n proving them wrong, they decided to use the underhanded trick of stealing my moniker and posting ridiculous shit as a lame attempt to discredit what I was sayin. That was Jen I has to register and change my name to BobJenkins-OG. Finally, almost a year later I cn just post unde my original moniker 'Jenkins'

The fact is, anyone who says I am the only one who regularly hurls insults and obscenities is a straight up huge LIAR, that's a fact.
Go back and read the thread if anyone questions this, please, and btw, if you pay attention, you'll notice that the only insults and obscenities I use are ones that that bill, frmLE & co have already used on a regular basis. The only thing I feel stupid about is stooping down to their level, which is really low

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Now that's a dandy idea. They can start over from the very beginning and go over each and every theory, opinion, lie, accusation etc and chew on it all for at least the 20th time.

Oh, I agree, splendid idea! "Let's start at the very beginning, a very good place to start ... " Sing along everybody!!!
And of course, the best place for them to start is here:

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
I think every human being on earth could be considered.As Ive said before,has anyone been ruled out?