|
Parrot in Room
United States
|
Judged:
1
peekaboo wrote: ding dong Were sorry, your call did not go through. Would you please hang up and try your call again.
|
|
Stephen
United States
|
Snowy wrote: <quoted text>
mean? incendiary? clueless? i don't think this post could be any more politely written. clearly, if one does not agree with the 'abduction' theory, one is mean, incendiary and clueless. childish. They are only capable of primitive communication, its hard to blame 'em. "Forgive them father for they know not what they do."
|
|
rozShoem
Gouverneur, NY
|
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text>
Why are you waiting for others to follow up and find answers. Why don't you do it? You have a computer and most likely a phone so why wait for someone else to find the questions that you are asking about.
You condemn everyone else for not doing anything but yet you do exactly the same.
Find those missing dots. Come on, I know you can do it. My salary is not being paid by the government nor am I a PI, but one thing is certain. Had I been an officer, a ST, an investigator or a PI at the time of Maura's disappearance...or even now...it would be of great importance to have interviewed everyone who was at the scene of the accident that evening. Earlier posters on this forum mention that there HAD been a ST at the accident scene. They are discussing there had been no interview, no follow up regarding him. If this is true, it is incredible. Two people are discussing the possibility that there is reason to believe he may have been at the accident scene prior to the Haverhill police officer. And yet he was not interviewed? Basically, whether or not 200 PIs are now involved in the case....if information like this is "overlooked" not obtained, no follow-up, no interview........the investigation seems to be a bit lacking it would seem. You and your little friends are fighting a losing battle in your efforts to redirect and dampen memories. No wonder people are so upset about the case and ensuing investigation. Now I fully understand why Maura's father approached the Court about this nightmare. No wonder people continue to ask questions and feel uncomfortable. Read some of those earlier postings (pages 38 and 39) and you will see why people have concerns. It's obvious, Wowzer...something is very wrong and unlike the people who've disappeared, the questions are not about to fade into the White Mountains.
|
|
rozShoem
Gouverneur, NY
|
Snowy wrote: <quoted text>
and perhaps, just perhaps....to be sheltered by a relative? Snowy, Fortunately, I have no family dependency issues. Evidentally, you are much younger and experiencing the joys of family life (planning baby showers, etc.). Good for you. However, my lifestyle or life stage is otherwise. Enjoy where you are with your focus on family.
|
|
rozShoem
Gouverneur, NY
|
Snowy wrote: <quoted text>
mean? incendiary? clueless? i don't think this post could be any more politely written. clearly, if one does not agree with the 'abduction' theory, one is mean, incendiary and clueless. childish. Snowy, As I've previously mentioned, it is important to stay open to all theories, all possibilities. However, my tendency is to lean toward the abduction theory even though I will add that initially, at least to Maura...it did not appear to be a situation of abduction. I believe that she initially trusted this individual and got into his car of her own volition. Unfortunately, this situation may have soon changed. If one considers the endless searches, the 6 years that have passed and still no Maura.....the abduction/foul play theory seems quite reasonable.
|
|
rozShoem
Gouverneur, NY
|
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text>
Why are you waiting for others to follow up and find answers. Why don't you do it? You have a computer and most likely a phone so why wait for someone else to find the questions that you are asking about.
You condemn everyone else for not doing anything but yet you do exactly the same.
Find those missing dots. Come on, I know you can do it. Wowzer, You raise a interesting point, word. Computer. Some of these young women had some type of contact with LE within at least a 3-week period prior to their disappearance. Based on this, it seems there may be some type of inter-state/adjacent state/multi-state database of information whenever LE have contact with individuals for purpose of interviews, traffic violations, etc. Three of these young women had contact with police shortly before their disappearance and their names and personal/demographic information may appear on such a database of information. Sarah R had contact I believe the same day of her disappearance (in fact she was held for a few hours). Maura M had contact with police the weekend prior to the Monday she disappeared. Brianna M. had filed a police report/had pressed charges within approximately 3-week time period prior to her disappearance. While I do have a computer....I do not have access to the database such as the one described above, nor do I have permission, authority to access such information. However, it seems like a fairly simple task to determine if names of some of the "missing" and "unsolved homicide" and "suspected homicide victims appear in this database shortly PRIOR to their disappearance. Alternative: Investigators might check with close family members to determine if the missing family member had contact with LE 3 weeks to 1 month PRIOR to the last time they were seen. Someone without authority may be accessing names, personal information from a database. Three young women....DID have contact with LE shortly BEFORE their disappearance (Sarah R, Maura M, Brianna M.). It appears there may be others.
|
|
Snowy
Gloucester, MA
|
rozShoem wrote: <quoted text>
Snowy,
Fortunately, I have no family dependency issues. Evidentally, you are much younger and experiencing the joys of family life (planning baby showers, etc.). Good for you. However, my lifestyle or life stage is otherwise. Enjoy where you are with your focus on family. just wondering if you might be the Canadian relative of Maura's? the psychic? or similarly related? you are, after all, so intensely interested and involved....and have become the mouthpiece for MMM, however feeble are your attempts to convince the small attending public of your views.
|
|
Snowy
Gloucester, MA
|
rozShoem wrote: <quoted text>
Snowy,
As I've previously mentioned, it is important to stay open to all theories, all possibilities. However, my tendency is to lean toward the abduction theory even though I will add that initially, at least to Maura...it did not appear to be a situation of abduction. I believe that she initially trusted this individual and got into his car of her own volition. Unfortunately, this situation may have soon changed. If one considers the endless searches, the 6 years that have passed and still no Maura.....the abduction/foul play theory seems quite reasonable. fine. you believe in the abduction theory. we know that. and you haven't answered Euro's questions because you seem to have no factual basis in reality for providing a description and profile of such an abductor. obviously, it is unknown by authorities, or not yet revealed, what happened as for her to disappear. i doubt, unless you have had contact with Maura, that you know with any certainty what has become of her. and it becomes foolish to argue these points. when will you stop?
|
|
Snowy
Gloucester, MA
|
rozShoem wrote: <quoted text>
Wowzer,
You raise a interesting point, word. Computer. Some of these young women had some type of contact with LE within at least a 3-week period prior to their disappearance. Based on this, it seems there may be some type of inter-state/adjacent state/multi-state database of information whenever LE have contact with individuals for purpose of interviews, traffic violations, etc. Three of these young women had contact with police shortly before their disappearance and their names and personal/demographic information may appear on such a database of information. Sarah R had contact I believe the same day of her disappearance (in fact she was held for a few hours). Maura M had contact with police the weekend prior to the Monday she disappeared. Brianna M. had filed a police report/had pressed charges within approximately 3-week time period prior to her disappearance. While I do have a computer....I do not have access to the database such as the one described above, nor do I have permission, authority to access such information. However, it seems like a fairly simple task to determine if names of some of the "missing" and "unsolved homicide" and "suspected homicide victims appear in this database shortly PRIOR to their disappearance. Alternative: Investigators might check with close family members to determine if the missing family member had contact with LE 3 weeks to 1 month PRIOR to the last time they were seen. Someone without authority may be accessing names, personal information from a database. Three young women....DID have contact with LE shortly BEFORE their disappearance (Sarah R, Maura M, Brianna M.). It appears there may be others. heavy sleuthing and deduction taking place here. pause. i'll bet they all wore shoes, too.
|
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
rozShoem wrote: <quoted text>Three young women....DID have contact with LE shortly BEFORE their disappearance (Sarah R, Maura M, Brianna M.). It appears there may be others. An absolute untruth. Where is there any evidence that Maura had any contact with LE shortly before her disappearance. Same goes for Brianna. By extension I suspect that you are wrong about Sarah though I don't know enough about her. And while making such a blatant lie you should also include which officer was involved in these abductions. Unless, of course, you think there are at least three different LE officers stealing pretty young girls in that area. You cannot throw lies out about these cases and not expect them to be labeled as such. Bill
|
|
Snowy
Gloucester, MA
|
yes, this is bold lying, and once again, these are hysterical and unproven implications of wrongdoing against law enforcement without proof. and you do so anonymously. that would seem to fall under the category of 'dirtbag' in itself.
|
|
Nooooooowe
United States
|
ne! OPEN: Theme from Jaws, plane busts out of clouds like Jaws... Voiceman: The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the red zone. Voiclady: The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the red zone. Voiceman: The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the red zone. Voiclady: The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the red zone. Zealot#1: Hello, we'd like you to have this flower from the religious consciousness church, would you care to make a donation? Elaine : No, thank you anyway. Voiceman: The red zone is for immediate loading and unloading of passengers only, there is no stopping in the white zone. Voiclady: NO! The white zone is for immediate loading and unloading and there is no stopping in the red zone. Voiceman: The red zone has always been for loading and unloading there is never stopping in a white zone. Voiclady: Don't tell me which zone is for stopping and which zone is for loading. Voiceman: Listen Betty, don't start up with your white zone shit again! Zealot#2: Hello, we'd like you to have this flower from the religious consciousness church, would you like to make a donation?????????: No thanks, we gave at the office.
|
|
Nooooooowe
United States
|
Thus Quoteth: "An absolute untruth. Where is there any evidence that Maura had any contact with LE shortly before her disappearance. Same goes for Brianna. By extension I suspect that you are wrong about Sarah though I don't know enough about her. And while making such a blatant lie you should also include which officer was involved in these abductions. Unless, of course, you think there are at least three different LE officers stealing pretty young girls in that area. You cannot throw lies out about these cases and not expect them to be labeled as such. Bill"
|
|
Nooooooowe
United States
|
Thus Sayeth Bill: "An absolute untruth. Where is there any evidence that Maura had any contact with LE shortly before her disappearance. Same goes for Brianna. By extension I suspect that you are wrong about Sarah though I don't know enough about her. And while making such a blatant lie you should also include which officer was involved in these abductions. Unless, of course, you think there are at least three different LE officers stealing pretty young girls in that area. You cannot throw lies out about these cases and not expect them to be labeled as such. Bill"
|
|
Nooooooowe
United States
|
Thus Discusseth: "An absolute untruth. Where is there any evidence that Maura had any contact with LE shortly before her disappearance. Same goes for Brianna. By extension I suspect that you are wrong about Sarah though I don't know enough about her. And while making such a blatant lie you should also include which officer was involved in these abductions. Unless, of course, you think there are at least three different LE officers stealing pretty young girls in that area. You cannot throw lies out about these cases and not expect them to be labeled as such. Bill"
|
|
Nooooooowe
United States
|
Thus Communicateth: "An absolute untruth. Where is there any evidence that Maura had any contact with LE shortly before her disappearance. Same goes for Brianna. By extension I suspect that you are wrong about Sarah though I don't know enough about her. And while making such a blatant lie you should also include which officer was involved in these abductions. Unless, of course, you think there are at least three different LE officers stealing pretty young girls in that area. You cannot throw lies out about these cases and not expect them to be labeled as such. Bill"
|
|
Nooooooowe
United States
|
Thus Copyeth: "An absolute untruth. Where is there any evidence that Maura had any contact with LE shortly before her disappearance. Same goes for Brianna. By extension I suspect that you are wrong about Sarah though I don't know enough about her. And while making such a blatant lie you should also include which officer was involved in these abductions. Unless, of course, you think there are at least three different LE officers stealing pretty young girls in that area. You cannot throw lies out about these cases and not expect them to be labeled as such. Bill"
|
|
Nooooooowe
United States
|
Thus Pasteth: "An absolute untruth. Where is there any evidence that Maura had any contact with LE shortly before her disappearance. Same goes for Brianna. By extension I suspect that you are wrong about Sarah though I don't know enough about her. And while making such a blatant lie you should also include which officer was involved in these abductions. Unless, of course, you think there are at least three different LE officers stealing pretty young girls in that area. You cannot throw lies out about these cases and not expect them to be labeled as such. Bill"
|
|
Nooooooowe
United States
|
So let it be written, so let it be done: "An absolute untruth. Where is there any evidence that Maura had any contact with LE shortly before her disappearance. Same goes for Brianna. By extension I suspect that you are wrong about Sarah though I don't know enough about her. And while making such a blatant lie you should also include which officer was involved in these abductions. Unless, of course, you think there are at least three different LE officers stealing pretty young girls in that area. You cannot throw lies out about these cases and not expect them to be labeled as such. Bill"
|
|
Nooooooowe
United States
|
Judge Wapner is About to Render His Decision: "An absolute untruth. Where is there any evidence that Maura had any contact with LE shortly before her disappearance. Same goes for Brianna. By extension I suspect that you are wrong about Sarah though I don't know enough about her. And while making such a blatant lie you should also include which officer was involved in these abductions. Unless, of course, you think there are at least three different LE officers stealing pretty young girls in that area. You cannot throw lies out about these cases and not expect them to be labeled as such. Bill"
|
|
|
Dating
