Maura Murray

FRMLE "While that sure makes you feel justified in slamming everyone who did anything, the reality is that we never have hindsight in real life, do we? We do what our SOP’s tell us to do, we do what experience has taught us is the best course of action. At the time, not days, weeks, months or 9 years later." I have not slammed anyone. I appreciate anything that anyone has done on behalf of Maura. Iam confused as to what has been said to me and what has been done on that night. Just because I have questions it does not mean Iam slamming anyone.

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
Shocking that you were the source. More bullshit.
No matter where you heard it, it is not true it did not happen.

Why....and You know because you were there.?

Tang Zoi wrote:

NEVERMIND.......
There is no arguing with the AGENDA..!

You mean reason right. No arguing with reason.

In case anyone is interested: RO has posted a reply to Renner´s blog post about the red truck revisited. She´s expanding some on what she´s previously posted. She posts as Anonymous April 26 @8:59 pm.

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
Your ignorance is really starting to show now. So to you a reasonable discussion that demonstrates your lack of thought and intelligence, not to mention getting caught in some lies, is now called "AGENDA".
LOL, You should go work for Obama, you share similar character traits.

I knew You were a Republican. Should have figured that.

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
Exactly what I thought. So as I stated, you have no idea where he searched and didn't search and you have not seen the report that contains his statement from that night.
So for you to say he did not go East on 112 is a lie.
Glad we got that sorted out.

Well, I have to say that I'm just now trying to catch up on everything....and, this is amazing info to me! So, I understand you to say that you've seen Monaghan's report and that Monaghan did search east?

Personally, I have always thought that Monaghan, along with Smith, were both searching the area from an incident that occured around 7:00 p.m.

That call was responded to, from what I understand and was then cancelled. However, LE would still be required to respond. Emergency could turn around and go back. But LE would still be required to respond.

Remember Monaghan refused to answer questions about "time" of the accident? And there's always been the conflicting times reported not only in the media but mentioned by Williams to Sharon.

Who has the authority to cancel a call on the radio?

I have to clarify what I said about conflicting times mentioned by Williams to Sharon....actually, Williams refused to answer Sharon's questions about the conflicting times.

He had told her she could ask anything and he would answer. However, when this particular question came up with respect to the conflicting times, he refused and when she "called him on it" he said he just couldn't discuss it.

Much or all of the damage to the Saturn happened before it left Amherst.

hannah_b wrote:

In case anyone is interested: RO has posted a reply to Renner´s blog post about the red truck revisited. She´s expanding some on what she´s previously posted. She posts as Anonymous April 26 @8:59 pm.

Correction:@5:39 pm.

Tang, you wrote this a few pages ago: "Alden.....why do You have a BW Ski ticket from the time MM went missing. You owned a red truck at the time MM disappeared."

How do you know Beagle owned a red truck?

From renners.....RO response about Red Truck.

"The red truck was going in the direction of the accident when it stopped in the middle of the hill in front of my house as I was walking...the lighting was poor there, and I thought to myself that maybe they either 1) thought I needed a ride or 2) that I was someone else. As I approached the stagestop, the truck was in the stagestop parking lot. I could tell there was someone watching me and as I got in the light of the pumps, the red truck pulled away, again, towards the accident. When I went into the store, I asked Wini if some people came in the store just now and she said no and I said well, there was a red truck that stopped in the hill with MA plates and then took off and was in your parking lot as I approached. We both shrugged it off as someone looking for someone else. Twenty minutes or so later, the PD went flying by. I continued to visit with Wini until she closed up at 8 and then started walking home. As I was approaching my driveway - in the middle of the hill again where it was dark - the ambulance went by - going towards 302/10 as if it was leaving the accident scene. It slammed on its brakes when it saw me and pulled into the Bunga Road (which is on the other side of my house). Then a state police officer pulled up and rolled down his window.....I said hello and he said oh, its you...and I said yep, just me...he asked if I had seen anyone else walking and I said no, and he left and the ambulance followed him. At that point I did not know of the accident and in fact, I didn't hear of it for a couple of days later when Wini called and told me and reminded me of the truck. Her and I spent numerous times looking for this truck to no avail. Now, the reason I was sure it was MA plates is because when it stopped in the hill, I looked at the plate and tried to memorize it (thinking to myself, oh great, I am going to get kidnapped or something). Obviously, a few days later the only thing I could remember was the MA plates. Hope this helps clarify things for you. Whether it had anything to do with Maura disappearing, I have no idea. WS Robinson"

Maruchan wrote:

Tang, you wrote this a few pages ago: "Alden.....why do You have a BW Ski ticket from the time MM went missing. You owned a red truck at the time MM disappeared."
How do you know Beagle owned a red truck?

Ask Him....he posts here as well. He will tell You. Maybe...crypticly though.

FrmLE, who has the authority to cancel a call that has been dispatched?44

hannah_b wrote:

In case anyone is interested: RO has posted a reply to Renner´s blog post about the red truck revisited. She´s expanding some on what she´s previously posted. She posts as Anonymous April 26 @8:59 pm.

That's pretty much what I remember her saying. Maybe now the arguing as to if it was a NH or MA truck can be put to rest. She is sure it was a MA plate just as she said long ago. Her story hasn't changed.

OOPS, that number "44" was a total accident ... it was part of the number that we type in the box...so sorry...

https://www.facebook.com/Houseoftoi

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Citigirl picture the houses that were all in view. Now picture the backyards of these houses. In order for anyone to be arguing in one of those back yards they would have had to tramp through the snow. Why would they do that when they could argue in the driveway or the road or the front yard?

Wowzer I understand what you are saying. I do know what the back yards look like that are all in view .I cannot and will not give the location of this person or there name. Why would they seek us out and give us this info? They came looking for us. We did not look for them because we knew nothing about this until they found us.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

three times is a charm

Tang Zoi wrote:

<quoted text>
Ask Him....he posts here as well. He will tell You. Maybe...crypticly though.

I'm not interested in what Beagle says. You stated that Beagle owned a red truck as fact. Do you know this is fact, and, if so, how do you know? Have you ever seen his red truck?

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>Wowzer I understand what you are saying. I do know what the back yards look like that are all in view .I cannot and will not give the location of this person or there name. Why would they seek us out and give us this info? They came looking for us. We did not look for them because we knew nothing about this until they found us.

I don't want to know their name or location. I have no idea why they would seek you out.
I'm not saying they lied, I'm just saying to picture it and use common sense which I know you have.