Maura Murray

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Geez, did I strike I nerve?
You guys act like she out ran you.....
Is that why the time sensitive questions are not allowed?

Lot of good that did huh?

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I think it's hysterical that he writes <quoted text>
Why would any woman take offense at being called a bitch? He is such a class act.
Bill

i won't admit to taking offense...just wearing Epic Bitch Pride...and, being a class act, refraining from labeling him. though i could. ;)

whatif wrote:

hello? is this thing on? 9 hours without a single comment on this thread? crazy.

Maybe they're busy helping Renner look through Marathon photos? Nothing personal against Renner, but I highly doubt that anyone will find her that way.

Until Renner posts some more interviews or public records, there's little left to discuss IMHO.

HEY SNOWY! I'll keep this black and white for you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe they're busy helping Renner look through Marathon photos? Nothing personal against Renner, but I highly doubt that anyone will find her that way.
Until Renner posts some more interviews or public records, there's little left to discuss IMHO.

Might have to go back and read the other 97% of each of Jenkins' posts.....

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>Maybe they're busy helping Renner look through Marathon photos?

Holy crap. You might be right. They must be the ones that broke this case and told the FBI about the three others that they just arrested?

Bill

Hope this link to article posts -- seems relevant:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/05/01/pennsylv...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

warning: this is emotional material.

great article, Advocate. people can and do hide in plain view.

i've asked before...perhaps our legal beagle, SS, can answer, at least in general.

would MM's father/sister/brother/or another be able to declare her legally deceased at this time?
or in a previous year?
in NH? or MA?

Snowy wrote:

great article, Advocate. people can and do hide in plain view.
i've asked before...perhaps our legal beagle, SS, can answer, at least in general.
would MM's father/sister/brother/or another be able to declare her legally deceased at this time?
or in a previous year?
in NH? or MA?

I'd imagine it could be done at this point through a court proceeding.

Snowy wrote:

great article, Advocate. people can and do hide in plain view.
i've asked before...perhaps our legal beagle, SS, can answer, at least in general.
would MM's father/sister/brother/or another be able to declare her legally deceased at this time?
or in a previous year?
in NH? or MA?

She could theoretically have been declared dead several years ago, but it would have to be done through court proceedings. Many states seem to have a 7 year nissing requirement. If she had been declared dead, she would be found in SSDI. Last I checked she wasn´t there.

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
She could theoretically have been declared dead several years ago, but it would have to be done through court proceedings. Many states seem to have a 7 year nissing requirement. If she had been declared dead, she would be found in SSDI. Last I checked she wasn´t there.

i figured the 7 year rule, but thought there might be a different take on this, given an investigation is still "active", even if "cold".

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'd imagine it could be done at this point through a court proceeding.

no doubt, but then the emotional issues surrounding such a declaration would be complicated.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
no doubt, but then the emotional issues surrounding such a declaration would be complicated.

I'm not sure how it works with Death in absentia, but the cause of death could be a major point on why this isn't done. I don't know anything about it, but I'd be interested if "cause of death" is on the certificate.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
i figured the 7 year rule, but thought there might be a different take on this, given an investigation is still "active", even if "cold".

I'm not sure if it is a seven year rule. I think its done by probability as in likelihood of being dead.

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not sure if it is a seven year rule. I think its done by probability as in likelihood of being dead.

If she were declared leagally 'dead', would that affect her status with the NH CCU? I tend to think it wouldn't but those dang legal issues, maybe put her colder than cold as far as being an active investigation, thus preventing the family from taking action.

I believe there are usually other legal issues such as custody of children, life insurance, ownership of property, etc. that prompts a legally dead declaration. None of which would be an issue in this case except for possibly life insurance.

http://lawbrain.com/wiki/Death_and_Dying

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
i figured the 7 year rule, but thought there might be a different take on this, given an investigation is still "active", even if "cold".

I think that during such court proceedings, they would have to present some evidence or indications she is dead, like a LE statement saying they believe her to be deceased. I wonder if they even could meet this requirement?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
I think that during such court proceedings, they would have to present some evidence or indications she is dead, like a LE statement saying they believe her to be deceased. I wonder if they even could meet this requirement?

Perhaps an attempt to have her declared legally dead would force LE to present their evidence, thus giving Fred the information he has been seeking for so many years. Can they make him sit outside chambers in that proceeding as well?