Maura Murray

Posted in the Franconia Forum

Comments (Page 1,819)

Showing posts 36,361 - 36,380 of47,062
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Mar 13

Woodsville, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37175
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:
READ CAREFULLY....#5
Outgoing call to MM phone from Londonderry NH tower. Simple enough
"Supporting Affidavit for Issuance of Search Warrant I, Todd D. Landry, do hereby depose and say;
1. That I am currently employed by the State Police and have been for the past ten years. Currently, I am assigned as a Detective at Trooop- F in Twin Mountain, NH. I have received extensive training in the investigation of criminal matters.
2. That on February 9, 2004 at 1927 hours the Haverhill, NH Police Department responded to a single vehicle motor vehicle crash on Route 112 in Haverhill, NH. Upon arrival, Sgt. Cecil Smith was unable to locate the driver of the vehicle. Subsequent investigation determined that the driver of the vehicle was MAURA MURRAY (d.o.b. 05/04/82), 22 Walker Street, Weymouth, MA.
3. A witness at the scene later confirmed that the driver was MURRAY.
4. An extensive search of the area has been conducted and MURRAY has not been located.
5. During the course of this investigation, Cellular Telephone records have been obtained by Law Enforcement that were used by MURRAY. A representative from Sprint Corporate Security advised this affiant that during the late afternoon hours of February 9, 2004an outgoing telephone call was made to Murray from the Londonderry, NH Sprint tower. This call had to have been made from within a 22 mile radius of the tower. The identity of this caller and telephone number has not been made as of this date.
6. That identifying the caller of the telephone call could be pertinent to the ongoing investigation and may lead to the whereabouts of Maura Murray.
7. Based on the foregoing, there is probable cause to believe evidence in the suspicious disappearance of Maura Murray may be found through Sprint Wireless Cell Tower Telephone Records, including any outgoing calls from the Londonderry tower of Sprint to Maura Murrays Sprint PCs number ********** for February 9, 2004 from 0001 hours to 2400 hours.
Todd D. Landry"
Tang have you noticed that this annoying habit of posting the same statement over and over with no supporting commentary actually accomplishes nothing? Beagle is an expert at it and look where it has gotten him. Is this where you are trying to go? For you and Alden both, if you have some thing to say, just say it. The games are annoying and accomplish nothing relative to this forum.

“"CONFUSION CENTRAL"”

Since: Dec 11

Franconia NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37176
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

BillNH wrote:
<quoted text>
Tang have you noticed that this annoying habit of posting the same statement over and over with no supporting commentary actually accomplishes nothing? Beagle is an expert at it and look where it has gotten him. Is this where you are trying to go? For you and Alden both, if you have some thing to say, just say it. The games are annoying and accomplish nothing relative to this forum.
Wah Wah.......

Read #5 people.......

Understand Your point, but people here are dense. CALL TO HER PHONE FROM LONDONDERRY TOWER....22 MILE RADIUS.

I don't believe She traveled to 93 north. JMHO

John

“"CONFUSION CENTRAL"”

Since: Dec 11

Franconia NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37177
Jun 2, 2013
 
As far as the PING goes. It makes no difference which way She went. It would have no influence on the outcome of the LONDONDERRY PING.

John

Since: Mar 13

Woodsville, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37178
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Det Columbo wrote:
<quoted text>
Wah Wah.......
Read #5 people.......
Understand Your point, but people here are dense. CALL TO HER PHONE FROM LONDONDERRY TOWER....22 MILE RADIUS.
I don't believe She traveled to 93 north. JMHO
John
I happen to agree with you but it took me a while to get there. I am still not 100% and you shouldn't be either because it is a bit ambiguous. We don't know exactly what they are referring to and we do not know what path she took.

However, the couple of sentences explaining your position was much friendlier than posting the affidavit over and over.

“"CONFUSION CENTRAL"”

Since: Dec 11

Franconia NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37179
Jun 2, 2013
 
BillNH wrote:
<quoted text>
I happen to agree with you but it took me a while to get there. I am still not 100% and you shouldn't be either because it is a bit ambiguous. We don't know exactly what they are referring to and we do not know what path she took.
However, the couple of sentences explaining your position was much friendlier than posting the affidavit over and over.
Thank You....agreed.

Some people just DO NOT READ ITEMS but then post about it. It got Your attention though, let's see IF anyone else gets it.

John

Since: Mar 13

Woodsville, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37180
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank You....agreed.
Some people just DO NOT READ ITEMS but then post about it. It got Your attention though, let's see IF anyone else gets it.
John
We all have access to the affidavit. The repeated posting was not helpful, just annoying.

“"CONFUSION CENTRAL"”

Since: Dec 11

Franconia NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37181
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

BillNH wrote:
<quoted text>
We all have access to the affidavit. The repeated posting was not helpful, just annoying.
It is going to happen. It has been happening here for years. It will be happening here for years.

Annoying or not.!

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37182
Jun 2, 2013
 
Once Again wrote:
The affidavit asks for the identity of a person calling to maura.
It places the location of the person who called Maura.
It does not place Mauras location.
At one point we had worked out that mathematically Maura had to have gone up the more westernly interstate.But that was based on a time stated as when voice mail was checked by Maura and placed her at Amherst. The ping was not a part of that determination.
However caution on the above departure time. The time of departure was reported second hand. Further...no verifying evidence available to the public places her at the ATM to get a start time.
well said.
note: "The time of departure was reported second hand."

and, yet, the navel gazing has gone on for 24+ hours now, not to mention previous ping discussions
over the years. this is what keeps the whole dang conversation going.
it will rewind, again.

leaps to and bounding over points of departure....without having established facts...do not justify the conclusions that are drawn, and so it remains an exercise in futility until the next go-around.
and it ain't gonna solve anything.

but it's all grist for the gristmill, or wind for the windmill. round 'n round.

“"Johnny Tango "”

Since: Dec 12

Franconia, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37183
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

SnowyB wrote:
<quoted text>
well said.
note: "The time of departure was reported second hand."
and, yet, the navel gazing has gone on for 24+ hours now, not to mention previous ping discussions
over the years. this is what keeps the whole dang conversation going.
it will rewind, again.
leaps to and bounding over points of departure....without having established facts...do not justify the conclusions that are drawn, and so it remains an exercise in futility until the next go-around.
and it ain't gonna solve anything.
but it's all grist for the gristmill, or wind for The. windmill. round 'n round.
and yet you are still here.......HmmMmmmmmmm

Since: Jan 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37184
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Tang Zoi wrote:
<quoted text>and yet you are still here.......HmmMmmmmmmm
"stupid" is interesting.
to others, entertaining.

“"Johnny Tango "”

Since: Dec 12

Franconia, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37185
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Stupid is as stupid does.......So

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37186
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The triple-decker, student rental/party house on Phillips St., Amherst MA, likely frequented by Maura Murray, was owned by an autobody person.

The mortgage on the Phillips St. house was held by an autobody person.

Vasi's life-threatening injuries, sustained 2/5/04 on Triangle St., Amherst MA, are consistent with having been hit by a motor vehicle.

Maura Murray's father's Corolla was crashed 2/8/04.

Maura Murray's father's Saturn was crashed 2/9/04.

An autobody person (BSG) saw damage to the Saturn before the Saturn left Amherst and was found abandoned shortly thereafter in Haverhill NH.

The same autobody person (BSG) who saw damage to the Saturn also saw the damaged Corolla.

Police inspected the Corolla after its crash.

The first PI to investigate Maura Murray's disappearance was a certified expert auto crash reconstructionist who does work for Amherst Appraisal, an auto crash appraisal company.

The PI's office has been located for the past few years exactly next to, in the same building as, Amherst Appraisal.

Amherst Appraisal's 2004 office abutted the property of the Hadley motel where Maura's father was a guest.(Amherst Appraisal and the PI's office still abut the motel's property line.)

The Corolla was, according to a Hadley MA police officer, towed to the Hadley motel where Maura Murray's father was a guest.

A post on Topix, in 2008, stated that, according to an anonymous autobody repairman (BSG), the Corolla was inspected by area police. This post was followed hours later, after dark, by minor vandalism to the poster's property.

**********

A lot of stuff related to motor vehicles.

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37187
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jenkins wrote:
<quoted text>
Orky- I'm sorry to have to tell you this but you're WAYYYY off on tthis whole londonderry ping thing.
First of all it should've never been called the 'londonderry ping' because that is a misleading name, in reality that affidavit had nothing to do with pings, which reveal the location of a phone but rather was an attempt to find out who called Maura at that time. The affidavit is clear, it is an attempt to figure out the phone number and identity of someone who tried to CALL HER from the Londonderry area
LE had absolutely no need for any affidavit to get any info from Sprint regarding Maura's cell phone, the phone was in Sharon's name and Sharon gave LE full permission to get any and all info they could out of it. That means that right from the start they had ALL of her info, all her phone calls, all of her pings. When the owner of the account gives complete permission there is no need for any affidavit. There is even a quote from Sharon where she talks about being on the phone with Sprint with an investigator there so they could set it up to see her phone records, which would obviouly include ping information. Since the owner of the phone gave persmission there is NO privacy problem at all.
The affidavit clearly states it is looking for the number of an INCOMING call TO Maura's phone that was routed through the Londonderry, NH cell tower. The affidavit actually has absolutely nothing to do with any location of anybody, it is about obtaining the phone number of someone who attempted to CALL HER. It says this in the affidavit plain as day, there's nothing about anything regarding locating where Maura was it was about someone trying to call her.
By the time this affidavit was written LE knew where her final ping was at, they knew that within the first days of the investigation.
Basically they asked Sprint if anybody had tried to call her number, they probably asked every cell company and with Sprint they got a hit. Sprint told them that someone tried to call her at a certain time and through a certain tower. LE then used this info when writing this affidavit.
Orky you gotta re-think this one, what you're saying doesn't make any sense on several different levels. Just because Renner decided to call it the Londonderry Ping does not mean that it was really about cell phone pings, which are used to track people. It was about trying to find the identity of SOMEONE WHO CALLED HER THAT AFTERNOON FROM THE LONDONDERRY,NH AREA.
The NHSP had all of her call history and ping info a long time before this affidavit was ever written up.
I don't see how anybody can think anything different, just READ THE AFFIDAVIT, it's very clear as to what it's pertaining to and it's NOT about Maura's final ping, which they wouldn't need an affidavit to obtain anyways.
What Jenkins wrote is complete BS. You don't even need to be an expert in telecom field to know Jenkins is just putting words into a post.
hannah_b

Sweden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37188
Jun 2, 2013
 
Det Columbo wrote:
READ CAREFULLY....#5
Outgoing call to MM phone from Londonderry NH tower. Simple enough
"Supporting Affidavit for Issuance of Search Warrant I, Todd D. Landry, do hereby depose and say;
1. That I am currently employed by the State Police and have been for the past ten years. Currently, I am assigned as a Detective at Trooop- F in Twin Mountain, NH. I have received extensive training in the investigation of criminal matters.
2. That on February 9, 2004 at 1927 hours the Haverhill, NH Police Department responded to a single vehicle motor vehicle crash on Route 112 in Haverhill, NH. Upon arrival, Sgt. Cecil Smith was unable to locate the driver of the vehicle. Subsequent investigation determined that the driver of the vehicle was MAURA MURRAY (d.o.b. 05/04/82), 22 Walker Street, Weymouth, MA.
3. A witness at the scene later confirmed that the driver was MURRAY.
4. An extensive search of the area has been conducted and MURRAY has not been located.
5. During the course of this investigation, Cellular Telephone records have been obtained by Law Enforcement that were used by MURRAY. A representative from Sprint Corporate Security advised this affiant that during the late afternoon hours of February 9, 2004an outgoing telephone call was made to Murray from the Londonderry, NH Sprint tower. This call had to have been made from within a 22 mile radius of the tower. The identity of this caller and telephone number has not been made as of this date.
6. That identifying the caller of the telephone call could be pertinent to the ongoing investigation and may lead to the whereabouts of Maura Murray.
7. Based on the foregoing, there is probable cause to believe evidence in the suspicious disappearance of Maura Murray may be found through Sprint Wireless Cell Tower Telephone Records, including any outgoing calls from the Londonderry tower of Sprint to Maura Murrays Sprint PCs number ********** for February 9, 2004 from 0001 hours to 2400 hours.
Todd D. Landry"
So why did they request the cell tower info and not just info on the particular phone that made the call? And why for the entire day and night? Did they seek info on any phone that was present in this tower´s range to see if any more of them belonged to someone known to MM? Why this interest in Londonderry vicinity? To me it seems there was more than an interest in the owner of the particular phone that made the attempted call to MM
hannah_b

Sweden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37189
Jun 2, 2013
 
What I meant was: they did not just request info on the attempted phone call to MM, they were actually requesting ping info - info on any phone that pinged off of this tower on this date, that is phones present in the area, not just phones making calls.
JWB

Lincoln, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37190
Jun 2, 2013
 
Once Again wrote:
The affidavit asks for the identity of a person calling to maura.
It places the location of the person who called Maura.
It does not place Mauras location.
Exactly the point I was trying to get across. I t is clear reading the affidavit that they were looking for the person who called Maura. Their phone hit the londonderry tower but never transfereed to Mauras phone/bill since her phone was turned off or out of the service area.
hannah_b

Sweden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37191
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

JWB wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly the point I was trying to get across. I t is clear reading the affidavit that they were looking for the person who called Maura. Their phone hit the londonderry tower but never transfereed to Mauras phone/bill since her phone was turned off or out of the service area.
Read the affidavit carefully. They were asking for a lot more info than just who called MM.
JWB

Lincoln, NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37192
Jun 2, 2013
 
hannah_b wrote:
<quoted text>
Read the affidavit carefully. They were asking for a lot more info than just who called MM.
"outgoing telephone call was made to Murray from the Londonderry, NH Sprint tower. This call had to have been made from within a 22 mile radius of the tower. The identity of this caller and telephone number has not been made as of this date."

That is all you need to know.

“"CONFUSION CENTRAL"”

Since: Dec 11

Franconia NH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37193
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

LE protocol would be to ask for the entire day. If fruitless then with more info in an affidavit they would be able to obtain more than the one day.

John

Since: Jul 11

Mount Vernon, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#37194
Jun 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

You are welcome in advance:(haha)

I took the liberty of going to the actual source Sprint Corporate Security to try and get some answers on this whole ping thing.

I did not talk to someone mind you, but I found some interesting info and will post it here.

This is from an actual handbook that Sprint put out for law enforcement (probably circa 2002) in how to properly go about getting phone information and utilizing the courts.

This below is what Sprint Corporate Security would provide police concerning someone's cell phone.

Sprint Corporate Security

Subscriber Information:
Name, address, SS #, Driver’s Liscence #, dates of service and ESN (Electronic Serial Number)

Call Detail Information:
January 2000 to present:
----Incoming/Outgoing available for most recent 45 day time period – can be put on diskette in a .csv file;
---- 10 months available on bill images – can be put onto diskette in an image viewer format

Cell Site Information:
Cell site information identifies the actual tower address calls are being received and placed through within the Sprint PCS CDMA Network. These tower sites are within a 1 to 3 mile approximate radius of the handset and triangulated by sectors. This information can be put on a diskette in a .csv file.(this information is released pursuant to search warrant signed by a magistrate or court order).

I haven't made heads or tails out of this, maybe someone with more cell phone lingo and knowledge can translate this for us.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 36,361 - 36,380 of47,062
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

31 Users are viewing the Franconia Forum right now

Search the Franconia Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
COlumbos HOuse of SPam 4 hr Habs 546
Author James Renner's Cruel Online 'Ruse' 6 hr Red October 19
Surprise Fireball Streaks Across Stunning Night... (Jul '13) 9 hr Willy Lion 16
Who do you support for U.S. House in New Hampsh... (Oct '10) Sun Habs 25
New book questions Ayotte judgment in officer s... (Sep '09) Apr 19 Red October 92
"TO TELL THE TRUTH" The Quest for True Identities Apr 17 Pointless Endeavor 57
NH law keeps murder case liars on the hook forever (Jul '09) Apr 15 SPQR 13
•••
•••
•••

Franconia Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Franconia People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••