Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

Contagiously complicated wrote:

<quoted text>
I was unsure if he was directing that post at me or "Steffie", whoever that is. If it was for me though, clearly his "" are an indication to me that he has somewhat located me on a social media site. So how creepy is that? And why that particular bit of insanity would be of any interest to me, I'm at a loss about, too. Perhaps because I made an offhand comment about him being as poor a detective as clemons21 or whatever the handle is? Since it obviously needs to be cleared up for Mr. Green, I don't care about any of it. If you're attempting to insinuate the emails came from me, please know that I am not nearly that intelligent. Oh, but you already do know that, right?

Judged:

1

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
That's funny you say "clue". You being the Mad Blurter have ever based anything on a clue.

Contagiously complicated wrote:

<quoted text>
I was unsure if he was directing that post at me or "Steffie", whoever that is. If it was for me though, clearly his "" are an indication to me that he has somewhat located me on a social media site. So how creepy is that? And why that particular bit of insanity would be of any interest to me, I'm at a loss about, too. Perhaps because I made an offhand comment about him being as poor a detective as clemons21 or whatever the handle is? Since it obviously needs to be cleared up for Mr. Green, I don't care about any of it. If you're attempting to insinuate the emails came from me, please know that I am not nearly that intelligent. Oh, but you already do know that, right?

Judged:

1

1

1

Habs wrote:

Wouldn't Maura, while trying to avoid the police after accident in N.H., have been trying to get her cell phone to work? I get that cell coverage was spotty in that area back then but there was nothing. What about if she got a ride? If she was really running 5 miles away? Still nothing. Makes me seriously consider the second phone idea.

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
It was less than spotty in the area of the crash, it would be non-existent if she headed east, probably until she got near the North Woodstock area.
I personally don't believe that a second cell phone was involved but can't rule it out.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

Habs wrote:

Wouldn't Maura, while trying to avoid the police after accident in N.H., have been trying to get her cell phone to work? I get that cell coverage was spotty in that area back then but there was nothing. What about if she got a ride? If she was really running 5 miles away? Still nothing. Makes me seriously consider the second phone idea.

Judged:

2

2

2

BillNH wrote:

<quoted text>
Even today I don't get a signal on 112 good enough to make a call until Beaver Pond/Lost River Caverns on the Woodstock side of the mtn. That's about 11 miles from the Saturn crash site.

Judged:

1

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
And still 6 miles from a usable signal on the Woodstock side from her position if it was her seen by CW, correct?
Bill

Det Columbo wrote:

Back to the cell phone service.....
Talk about WINDMILLING.....
Feeling the breeze.....
John

Judged:

3

2

2

Habs wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry I missed it originally. Thank you Bill(s). Whoosh.

Judged:

2

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't worry about the local "detective". He often confuses questions/answers/and other information on this case. Your particular question has never been asked before. It was presented as a question, and a possible theory that included some well thought out possible implications. Again, questions not presented as fact. Those types of probing questions should receive answers, in particular since it hadn't been a recycled question. The "detective" has a very poor grasp of the case. Don't worry when he gets confused at the difference between a question that has been asked over and over and over like the absurd TRAILER HITCH THEORY i.e. "the car didn't hit the trees" statement. Something he often parrots while offering no proof and runs contrary to all the evidence i.e the official police report. And he tries to compare such action to when someone else has a legitimate question and theory that hasn't actually been asked or looked at before.
Again, pay no mind to the local "detective". Most don't.
Bill

Judged:

2

2

Det Columbo wrote:

Back to the cell phone service.....
Talk about WINDMILLING.....
Feeling the breeze.....
John

Judged:

2

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Don't worry about the local "detective". He often confuses questions/answers/and other information on this case. Your particular question has never been asked before. It was presented as a question, and a possible theory that included some well thought out possible implications. Again, questions not presented as fact. Those types of probing questions should receive answers, in particular since it hadn't been a recycled question. The "detective" has a very poor grasp of the case. Don't worry when he gets confused at the difference between a question that has been asked over and over and over like the absurd TRAILER HITCH THEORY i.e. "the car didn't hit the trees" statement. Something he often parrots while offering no proof and runs contrary to all the evidence i.e the official police report. And he tries to compare such action to when someone else has a legitimate question and theory that hasn't actually been asked or looked at before.
Again, pay no mind to the local "detective". Most don't.
Bill