Maura Murray

You knew this was coming - it took me about a half hour to compile.:)

Total of posts by commenters on Green's blog:

Green: 155
Sam Ledyard: 57*
Tyler: 40
Les1961: 36
jw7219: 27
nhrider (JWB): 16
SharoninMass: 11
ashman99 (BillNH): 8
CharlestonPlant.: 8
A.P.(initials): 2 (same person as CharlestonP)
gnomony: 7
awolnation: 7
lindasjordan: 6
KiiKii: 5
traci5: 5
Peterr178: 4
fionag31: 4
midlandcity88: 3
chrisa05: 2
eeriddle: 2
volley132: 2
adamghost172: 2
viktorwim: 1
chicagomindy: 1
anameeper: 1
sunnyd808: 1
jenniferever: 1
amyb2: 1
Renner: 1

I think this tells the real story.

*Sam Ledyard was called a troll by Green for a post he made on Renner's blog, yet he is his biggest contributor - funny.:)

Does anyone have a copy of the article discussed here http://goo.gl/f8ch8 ? Its from a Vermont paper, on Maura, from 2008.

BTW, this was comments only, not original posts.

John88Green wrote:

Another cool thing: we just topped 600 comments since the site opened (for an an average of about 30 a day). Only one has been not approved for posting.

Oh, lookie lookie, he lies again. It's not only pathetic that he feels a need to come here to post his "numbers," but to inflate them? How incredibly insecure he must be.

His comment total as of my count at 10:30 p.m. tonight is 416.

Funny funny funny.:)

Maruchan wrote:

You knew this was coming - it took me about a half hour to compile.:)
Total of posts by commenters on Green's blog:
Green: 155
Sam Ledyard: 57*
Tyler: 40
Les1961: 36
jw7219: 27
nhrider (JWB): 16
SharoninMass: 11
ashman99 (BillNH): 8
CharlestonPlant.: 8
A.P.(initials): 2 (same person as CharlestonP)
gnomony: 7
awolnation: 7
lindasjordan: 6
KiiKii: 5
traci5: 5
Peterr178: 4
fionag31: 4
midlandcity88: 3
chrisa05: 2
eeriddle: 2
volley132: 2
adamghost172: 2
viktorwim: 1
chicagomindy: 1
anameeper: 1
sunnyd808: 1
jenniferever: 1
amyb2: 1
Renner: 1
I think this tells the real story.
*Sam Ledyard was called a troll by Green for a post he made on Renner's blog, yet he is his biggest contributor - funny.:)

LOL! No wonder he's trolling over here trying to get Topix posters to come to his blog. He's even dangled a prize out there....come and contribute and become an author. Sounds pretty important. ;)

I assure you that I am not a troll. If you wish to debate any point that I have made, do so on the Maura Murray Community blog. Or at least quote something that I have actually said to support your position. Otherwise, bringing it up, on here, is simply childish.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL! No wonder he's trolling over here trying to get Topix posters to come to his blog. He's even dangled a prize out there....come and contribute and become an author. Sounds pretty important. ;)

Oh, I'm just rushin' right over there. Not.:)

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, I'm just rushin' right over there. Not.:)

I guess you have decided on childish. It's an open invitation.

SamuelSLedyard wrote:

I assure you that I am not a troll. If you wish to debate any point that I have made, do so on the Maura Murray Community blog. Or at least quote something that I have actually said to support your position. Otherwise, bringing it up, on here, is simply childish.

Umm I haven't seen where someone here called you a troll. Which post is it in?

SamuelSLedyard wrote:

I assure you that I am not a troll. If you wish to debate any point that I have made, do so on the Maura Murray Community blog. Or at least quote something that I have actually said to support your position. Otherwise, bringing it up, on here, is simply childish.

Oh, I didn't call you a troll, John Green did, just not by name.

Your post on Renner's blog on the entry "Forget the Past":

"Samuel Ledyard June 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM
What 'problems with the law'?

If you are referring to her fraudulent use of a credit card, she was not charged (it was a disciplinary matter with UMASS)."

About five hours later, Green's comment on his blog entry "Fred's Hotel":

"John Green says:
June 28, 2013 at 3:18 pm
... And by the way thanks for showing that the cc fraud was under judicial control. Some trolls are about trying to say it was a UMASS disciplinary thing and it never went beyond UMASS police."

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh, I didn't call you a troll, John Green did, just not by name.
Your post on Renner's blog on the entry "Forget the Past":
"Samuel Ledyard June 28, 2013 at 10:00 AM
What 'problems with the law'?
If you are referring to her fraudulent use of a credit card, she was not charged (it was a disciplinary matter with UMASS)."
About five hours later, Green's comment on his blog entry "Fred's Hotel":
"John Green says:
June 28, 2013 at 3:18 pm
... And by the way thanks for showing that the cc fraud was under judicial control. Some trolls are about trying to say it was a UMASS disciplinary thing and it never went beyond UMASS police."

This was a misunderstanding. Maura was not charged (an application for complaint was filed, but a complaint was never issued). But, of course, there was police involvement. This was cleared up later in the post.

You can make anyone look bad if you take things out of context.

SamuelSLedyard wrote:

<quoted text>
I guess you have decided on childish. It's an open invitation.

My reply was to Wowzer, not to you.

SamuelSLedyard wrote:

<quoted text>
This was a misunderstanding. Maura was not charged (an application for complaint was filed, but a complaint was never issued). But, of course, there was police involvement. This was cleared up later in the post.
You can make anyone look bad if you take things out of context.

Never mind. You posted an opinion, and Green called you out as a troll for that opinion. He was "talking behind your back, as it were, with another poster on his blog, ridiculing you and calling you names. Really quite simple, the "context" is quite clear.

You also thought I was responding to you when I was responding to Wowzer. You might want to read a bit more carefully.

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
Never mind. You posted an opinion, and Green called you out as a troll for that opinion. He was "talking behind your back, as it were, with another poster on his blog, ridiculing you and calling you names. Really quite simple, the "context" is quite clear.
You also thought I was responding to you when I was responding to Wowzer. You might want to read a bit more carefully.

There is no opinion involved. Maura was either charged or she was not. She was not charged; no complaint was issued. John Green misunderstood my comment, taking it to mean that there was no police involvement. It was then cleared up.

I have to get going. I doubt that I will be back.
If you would like to continue this discussion, do so here: http://themmcommunity.wordpress.com/ .

And I mean that sincerely. We share a common goal; an interest in seeing the best outcome for Maura Murray, her friends, and her family.

Contagiously complicated wrote:

<quoted text>
Bless you for that. I am sure it was a somewhat tedious task. But it's fabulous.
An image just came to me of Mr. Green sitting in a bingo hall on Saturday nights with all his bingo markers lined up in a row and his lucky troll doll family facing due north for the best luck. He loves a "troll" although I think he uses the term according to his definition of the particular behavior he's angry about at the moment. He even has hair like a troll.
Yeah. I was just commenting stupid. I liked it.

LOL!!!!

I liked it too.:)

Contagiously complicated wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, hey at least someone has a hard on for you. I'd be willing to bet its been a while since that's happened for you.

You are on a roll tonight!:)

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
The only thing you need to know is this forum holds people's opinions. Unless the statement is logically correct or quotes a source that is the best way to find a fact "or new information". If you start from the beginning you should realize which names you could probably start skipping over once you have read a couple of their posts.

OK, then. Good to know.

SamuelSLedyard wrote:

<quoted text>
There is no opinion involved. Maura was either charged or she was not. She was not charged; no complaint was issued. John Green misunderstood my comment, taking it to mean that there was no police involvement. It was then cleared up.

Sammy,

Thank you for clarifying Mr. Greens statement concerning your trollishness...I too could tell that he made the statement as fact, not opinion. You obviously are a clear headed debater. we could use an intellect such as yours over at the albino enzyme blog. Over there, we are all a united front working towards a common goal. It is our sincere desire to end constipation for once and all with this subset of the trout species.

Yes Sammy, I believe we have caught big fish here. I know I keep advising these topix trolls to do the statistics on the number of posts here on topix, but can you believe that some dude, namely a woman, but if I call her a dude, I'm able to inject that whole passive aggressive thing I'm known for, came and did an analysis on the numbers at our site?! How freakishly wierd is that Sammy boy? I know, I've given up my entire life, including a very promising future as a reinvented street musician to pursue a missing persons case concerning a woman that is at the other end of the country from me, not to mention the dollars spent, all in the name of compassion and humanity. It just seems so weird to me that people who actually hail from the state she is missing from spend so much time on a local forum dedicated to this case. It's just really, really odd!