Maura Murray

Judged:

2

2

2

John88Green wrote:

Another cool thing: we just topped 600 comments since the site opened (for an an average of about 30 a day). Only one has been not approved for posting.
I invite anyone to make a comment, even if you played rough or stupid here. It does not matter who comments. Only the content matters. If your comment is primarily about the case and not angry or critical toward someone else's post or comment, it will be posted. If you make a few comments within the simple "be an adult rule" you will be sent an invite to become an author, able to write and edit your own topic posts.
Regards,
John

Judged:

2

1

1

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

2. New evidence related to this case DOES get uncovered.

Judged:

2

2

1

John88Green wrote:

<quoted text>
You know Sam, we caught kind of big fish here, it looks like, by working together. Maybe we can make that post private and let folks here chase via little drips of rumor and overhearing the train that Renner et al, you et al and me et al will be long gone on, and the rest of us?
Listen, I will only bug you folks here on Topix a few more times. I still need to come here every few days to complete my work with citigirl's posts. And while here, you know it is hard not to come up to the top of the comment heap for some laughs. Anyway, by contrast - Sam - seems like our friends here seem to practically LIVE on our site. I mean, the amount of time that I can see a couple of them there - who are not smart enough to hide their scent in the data - is astounding. But I wont embarrass anyone. And did you see that one dude who went through and counted all the comments and then declared that I had exaggerated, triumphantly assuming that all the posts were open to just anyone with time enough - and weirdness enough - to COUNT every damned post on our site and not enough common sense to think that we might not want HIM to see every post? God heavens!
You know I should point that we have more followers now than Topix most often has people online at any given time. And that does not include the more than 100 other unique visitors, aside from them, who show up every day.
Look, folks here, the door is open to anyone who wants to come act like an adult and many from here already have and have made nice contributions. Past ridiculousness wont be held against you. None of this shit matters. The case matters. Lets address that and the new evidence that is emerging. If you have something to of value to add about the case, that is all that matters in the collegial discussion we have created. If instead you want to stay here and indulge your ironic obsessions with me (ironic in light of you stated attitudes which contradicts your psychological need to think about me to the point of a sadly large percentage of your posts being about me), well that is flattering except that it is utterly twisted and pathetic and makes me kind of wonder what unfortunate circumstances beset your peace of mind in life.
I am sorry to say, but in any case, there is a post coming from me in the next few weeks that will only heighten your fascinated angst toward me and probably further energize your Quixotic attempts to ... um ... what are you trying to accomplish again? But don't worry; I am not naming unknown names, which - hell, if I were you, damn - I would not want anyone to know who I am either! I am just point out something REALLY obvious that once happened here and documenting it. As far as I know, nobody has documented this event and dynamic even though many recognize it. Plainly portrayed it rises to the level of being an issue in the case. So, I am going to plainly portray it. Sorry in advance for how it will only make your angst toward me a lot worse.
Like I said, door's always open no hard feelings. Thanks to those of you who though you might deny it have already come along. Particularly would love to work out past problems with CC and see my late friend Amy come along. But ANYONE is welcome. Just post substance.
John

Judged:

1

1

1

John88Green wrote:

<quoted text>
You have WAY too much time on your hands.
And - oh by the way - you spend A LOT of time on MMC.
What makes you think YOU can see all the posts?
Are you not able to analyze your way past the issue.
C'mon man, I know the ship is sinking, but calm yourself.

Judged:

2

2

1

View From The Cheap Seats wrote:

<quoted text>
In the last few weeks the only intelligent post on here has come from Beagle when highlighting how Maura Murray's case could have a link to the Iranian community.

Judged:

1

Det Columbo wrote:

Moderator in the house....
Thanx Lighthouse.!
Seeing the light.
John

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
No problem Det Columbo. If I was a moderator I'd make you stick to one name. The lunatic from Utica thing doesn't do you any justice.

Judged:

2

2

2

John88Green wrote:

<quoted text>
Recruit. Nice try.
Just making sure that cool people here who care about the case (as opposed to being fascinated with me) know that the alternative is there. Seems to be getting echoey in here among you and your several handles and your and your several remaining friends who are not involved in any meaningful way in discourse about Maura's case, or privy to the late evidence gathered. But you are definitely leading the charge in having psychological hard ons for me. It would be flattering if it were not so utterly weird. You should do one of those counts and se the astonishing percentage of comments that are primarily about me on this forum over the last three months.
Now ... in THAT context ... now, that calls for "he he"

Judged:

2

2

2

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
OMG! I can't stop laughing. A psychological hard on? For you? Hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!! Really? Hahahahahah!!! How do you get around with that huge head of yours?
First I have to say that even if I tried my very hardest I wouldn't be able to muster up even the slightest of a hard on of any type for you.
Do you honestly think that we are fascinated with you? Really??
Just guessing but there's probably so many comments about you here because you come here acting like an idiot and insulting the posters which begs for us to comment about your comments.
And also I am among just a handful of posters here that use only one name. I don't have the need to talk to myself or use multiple names to get my point across.
Thanks for the laugh this morning. I'll be sure though from now on to skip over your posts until I've finished my coffee. It makes a heck of a mess when it's spit all over the monitor due to uncontrollable laughter.

Judged:

3

2

2

Contagiously complicated wrote:

<quoted text>
What do you bet that info is in the "hidden" posts?

Judged:

2

2

2

John88Green wrote:

<quoted text>
Look, folks here, the door is open to anyone who wants to come act like an adult and many from here already have and have made nice contributions. Past ridiculousness wont be held against you. None of this shit matters. The case matters. Lets address that and the new evidence that is emerging. If you have something to of value to add about the case, that is all that matters in the collegial discussion we have created. If instead you want to stay here and indulge your ironic obsessions with me (ironic in light of you stated attitudes which contradicts your psychological need to think about me to the point of a sadly large percentage of your posts being about me), well that is flattering except that it is utterly twisted and pathetic and makes me kind of wonder what unfortunate circumstances beset your peace of mind in life.
I am sorry to say, but in any case, there is a post coming from me in the next few weeks that will only heighten your fascinated angst toward me and probably further energize your Quixotic attempts to ... um ... what are you trying to accomplish again? But don't worry; I am not naming unknown names, which - hell, if I were you, damn - I would not want anyone to know who I am either! I am just point out something REALLY obvious that once happened here and documenting it. As far as I know, nobody has documented this event and dynamic even though many recognize it. Plainly portrayed it rises to the level of being an issue in the case. So, I am going to plainly portray it. Sorry in advance for how it will only make your angst toward me a lot worse.
Like I said, door's always open no hard feelings. Thanks to those of you who though you might deny it have already come along. Particularly would love to work out past problems with CC and see my late friend Amy come along. But ANYONE is welcome. Just post substance.
John

Det Columbo wrote:

<quoted text>
OH....You are sooooo WRONG.
As I have stated before......You have NO Clue.
John

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
No problem Det Columbo. If I was a moderator I'd make you stick to one name. The lunatic from Utica thing doesn't do you any justice.