Maura Murray

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
It doesn´t make much sense for them to redact the log after copies were already sent out to third parties.

The versions are different from each other. They aren't redacted. Redacted is when info is obscured and its obvious.

Det Columbo wrote:

<quoted text>
Well well well....
Then Why do 3 different versions exist.?
This really needs to be explained.!
Why is there a section redacted.?
John

You're trying to say there's a section deleted...not redacted. If it were redacted, it would still be there. Just not legible/readable cuz it's marked through.

Putting aside the block of time that's missing in between snowmobile and Mauras call, info in Maura's call is also altered from version to version.

The different versions should def be published online for everybody to see. 9+ years of secrets and the ole "I know something you don´t" attitide hasn´t done the case any good. Deleted/redacted/edited out or whatever, Columbo is right, it really does need an explanation.

Lady G, are you refering to the calls FM made about MM? I think I too have seen two different versions of this. One several years ago and then the one on Renner´s blog.

Lady Gray1 wrote:

<quoted text>
You're trying to say there's a section deleted...not redacted. If it were redacted, it would still be there. Just not legible/readable cuz it's marked through.
Putting aside the block of time that's missing in between snowmobile and Mauras call, info in Maura's call is also altered from version to version.

Yes....You are correct.

Thanx for the correction.

John

Lady Gray1 wrote:

<quoted text>
You're trying to say there's a section deleted...not redacted. If it were redacted, it would still be there. Just not legible/readable cuz it's marked through.
Putting aside the block of time that's missing in between snowmobile and Mauras call, info in Maura's call is also altered from version to version.

I remember citigirl claimed to have the 'real' version that she got herself from the sheriff's department but would not share it with anyone. She claims it is different from the copy Renner got and has posted on his sight.

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
You stated in 39612:
"Because Maura Murray had already been stopped by Haverhill LE approx. 15 minutes earlier.
LE was already looking for Maura when she crashed."
Are we to think by your deduction that Maura was stopped by LE and the patrol man didn't notice an airbag deployed? Did she crack the alchol open after the stop as a victory drink? If LE was so nice to let her off with no ticket why after the second crash did she feel the need to run? Not to mention why did they stop her and then start to look for her.

Maybe LE tried to pull her over & she didnt stop,they either chased her or were looking for her...Drinking&maybe there was $4000 worth of something illegal in the car?

Tang Zoi Det Columbo wrote:

TWINS.....Alden/Axel

Tang Zoi Det Columbo wrote:

Ole Reliance made twins.

Det Columbo wrote:

Hoping for a friendly meeting in Franconia NH.
John

Sure, we can meet. How about you, your Warrior friend Monaghan, and me? DT?

You guys can tell me how much you enjoyed trashing the memory of my deceased parents. So easy to picture you and Monaghan laughing like hell all over again.

Yeah, let's get together. Have a nice chat. All buddy-buddy like.

Is it standard practice to pay for a car with £4,000 in cash?

Sometimes.

View From The Cheap Seats wrote:

Is it standard practice to pay for a car with £4,000 in cash?

View From The Cheap Seats wrote:

Is it standard practice to pay for a car with £4,000 in cash?

What i don't do, and I wonder about others; is buy a cheap (under 5k) used car from a dealer. The markup is too great, get more for my money cutting out the middle man so I always buy the cheap one from individuals.

nooneswhotheyseem wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe LE tried to pull her over & she didnt stop,they either chased her or were looking for her...Drinking&maybe there was $4000 worth of something illegal in the car?

This is interesting but highly unlikely IMO. Basic reasoning: if it plays out the way you would expect, then there would be more log entries for the initial stop attempt and for the chase that would ensue. If there was a stop attempt and a chase that is not in the logs then the officer involved would have criminal intent, which I don't believe at all. That's a movie script, but I know a few posters who would disagree. Lastly if there was a legitimate stop attempt and chase that didn't end well, the number of people that would need to 'cover it up' would be prohibitive, so i don't believe it to be the case either.

BillNH wrote:

<quoted text>
What i don't do, and I wonder about others; is buy a cheap (under 5k) used car from a dealer. The markup is too great, get more for my money cutting out the middle man so I always buy the cheap one from individuals.

Absolutely. Craigslist, want ads, side of the road. Any thing I have ever bought for five grand or under is cash and from an individual.
My dad has always said if you have cash and patience you can buy a seven thousand dollar car for 4 g's and he is correct.

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Sure, we can meet. How about you, your Warrior friend Monaghan, and me? DT?
You guys can tell me how much you enjoyed trashing the memory of my deceased parents. So easy to picture you and Monaghan laughing like hell all over again.
Yeah, let's get together. Have a nice chat. All buddy-buddy like.

Well.....I have never talked to JM about You.

I did not invite You to the meeting.......BUT and this is a BIG BUT.

IF You are willing to come and be at the meeting then it would be nice to finally meet You. Monaghan will not be there.

Hopefully Green will be here, maybe Renner and Ledyard.

John

Det Columbo wrote:

<quoted text>
Well.....I have never talked to JM about You.
I did not invite You to the meeting.......BUT and this is a BIG BUT.
IF You are willing to come and be at the meeting then it would be nice to finally meet You. Monaghan will not be there.
Hopefully Green will be here, maybe Renner and Ledyard.
John

http://liarsclubphilly.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch...

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>
http://liarsclubphilly.com/

Please tell Me how the damage to the Saturn happened in Amherst.

I believe it did as well but do not know the circumstances around it.

You do......Don't You....?

John

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>
http://liarsclubphilly.com/

Tell Gino I say hello.......

https://www.youtube.com/watch...

Det Columbo wrote:

<quoted text>
Please tell Me how the damage to the Saturn happened in Amherst.
I believe it did as well but do not know the circumstances around it.
You do......Don't You....?
John

Doesn't necessarily matter how.

Just because Bob Rosazza SAW the damage to the Saturn before it left Amherst does not necessarily mean he knows HOW the damage occurred.

Most or all of the Saturn's damage was NOT sustained Feb 9, 2004 at the WB curve on 112.

BillNH wrote:

<quoted text>
What i don't do, and I wonder about others; is buy a cheap (under 5k) used car from a dealer. The markup is too great, get more for my money cutting out the middle man so I always buy the cheap one from individuals.

BillNH wrote:

<quoted text>
What i don't do, and I wonder about others; is buy a cheap (under 5k) used car from a dealer. The markup is too great, get more for my money cutting out the middle man so I always buy the cheap one from individuals.

an off-lease car can be a great option for purchase from a dealer, but usually costs more than 4K. the story line just doesn't make sense to me.