Maura Murray

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
yes, his name is in the news; no, there is no definitive link to MM that has been suggested or verified to the public by authorities. the nibbling at this topic does not make a connection any more or less viable than it has ever been.

I think the fact that he was in Salt Lake City on February 9, unless he also travelled under and alias and flew back out of SLC, makes a connection to MM a lot less viable.

BillNH wrote:

<quoted text>
I think the fact that he was in Salt Lake City on February 9, unless he also travelled under and alias and flew back out of SLC, makes a connection to MM a lot less viable.

agree, but it will not satisfy the team MM from broad speculation in pointing to abduction/homicide. thanks for keeping a rational outlook.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Can anyone verify that it was Beagle that re-posted the "Laughing Sadist" video with the new ending?

Heard Renner is removing the blog. John Green apparently has caused some problems.

I love JG latest post about "commenting anonymously". Translation - no one except two people will post on my crappy blog so I need to find other ways to draw people in, kind of like how Topix does it. And the reason they are afraid is because no one wants him to know who they are.

And no information on Renners blog since 7/27. Seems like a long time to me. Maybe fizzy is right.

Watching these things self destruct is kind of interesting. Not that I wish anyone ill.

On another note, I wish Citigirl would just let us know she is OK. Glad to see Rid, snowy, wowzer and BillNh still here.

Bill

WTH-the-original wrote:

I love JG latest post about "commenting anonymously". Translation - no one except two people will post on my crappy blog so I need to find other ways to draw people in, kind of like how Topix does it. And the reason they are afraid is because no one wants him to know who they are.
And no information on Renners blog since 7/27. Seems like a long time to me. Maybe fizzy is right.
Watching these things self destruct is kind of interesting. Not that I wish anyone ill.
On another note, I wish Citigirl would just let us know she is OK. Glad to see Rid, snowy, wowzer and BillNh still here.
Bill

I agree on all points Bill, I can't help but chuckle when I see Green trying to out L4M in one post and then encourage people to post anonymously in the very next post! He then ends the very post he has offered anonymity in by letting us know that after an exhaustive six week study, he will be exposing another famous forum poster.
I must be missing something here. Seriously. How does one write this stuff and not realize how contradictory it is? It just boggles the mind to think that he actually believes he has any credibilty with anyone wishing to remain anonymous.
I do wish Citi would just give us a heads up on how she is doing. I really don't care about her status with the family or what Green thinks about her. I am concerned.
I also would really like to get the low down from Renner about his honest opinion of Green at this point....?

Fizzy Winkle wrote:

Heard Renner is removing the blog. John Green apparently has caused some problems.

Any verification for this comment?

Ridiculous wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree on all points Bill, I can't help but chuckle when I see Green trying to out L4M in one post and then encourage people to post anonymously in the very next post! He then ends the very post he has offered anonymity in by letting us know that after an exhaustive six week study, he will be exposing another famous forum poster.
I must be missing something here. Seriously. How does one write this stuff and not realize how contradictory it is? It just boggles the mind to think that he actually believes he has any credibilty with anyone wishing to remain anonymous.
I do wish Citi would just give us a heads up on how she is doing. I really don't care about her status with the family or what Green thinks about her. I am concerned.
I also would really like to get the low down from Renner about his honest opinion of Green at this point....?

Well first, narcissists knows no bounds and have no worries about others. And his claims for anonymity for new users and then outing another person is in line with his continual behavior. Then there will likely be a feigned attempt at an apology, lamenting the fact that he maybe shouldn't have done it. Not that any of what he says regarding an apology is believable. People that apologize and then continue merrily doing the same things, display symptoms of a narcissistic personality or even a sociopathic personality. Just my thoughts. I still consider him in many respects a laughable buffoon.

Yes, I would like citigirl to just tell us everything is OK or if it is not, why? And I have no concern what green thinks so I wouldn't know why she would.

Bill

Ridiculous wrote:

<quoted text>
Normally, I, like everyone else don't bother responding to you because you are, to put it delicately, a fruit cup. This particular post of your's however brings one of your issues to the forefront and I thought, what the hell. This "pot" problem you're having; just lighten up there fella. I know, I know you have a legitimate medical condition and the state of California is very supportive of your need for "meds", but really, ever since Jenkins ran off with his bong, we've kinda chilled on these group bong circles or dope rings if you will. It's just so hard to make sense of most of what you say. Remember...moderation is key...

Another empty judgemental post. The trolls are here for you.

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Well first, narcissists knows no bounds and have no worries about others. And his claims for anonymity for new users and then outing another person is in line with his continual behavior. Then there will likely be a feigned attempt at an apology, lamenting the fact that he maybe shouldn't have done it. Not that any of what he says regarding an apology is believable. People that apologize and then continue merrily doing the same things, display symptoms of a narcissistic personality or even a sociopathic personality. Just my thoughts. I still consider him in many respects a laughable buffoon.
Yes, I would like citigirl to just tell us everything is OK or if it is not, why? And I have no concern what green thinks so I wouldn't know why she would.
Bill

Bill your talking about someone you don't know. On a subject you know little to nothing about. All based upon what a purposely antagonistic person claimed here.

This is completely counter to your "behavior". Notice that we arent in kindergarden. JG is not a threat. How could he?

So you had credibility but you lost it.

This thread has no value. Its just an example of crybaby women trying to phuck with any man they can. I can care less if they decide to project their fears upon JG and label it his behavior.

Snowy used to defend people from being mindlessly and flimsily accused....but apparently not in this case.

Any big mystery as to why this thread has no respect? No.

Take the whiny behavior fiction bullshit somewhere else.

Yo.

Anyone fly out of town while they owned a car?

Obviously yes.

Why dont you talk about his real behavior abd not John Green' s pretend behavior.

This troll gives Whiston and Maruchan a thimbs up this time. I dont agree with M s conclusion...but my opinion about M personally immaterial.

Perry Mason wrote:

<quoted text>
Bill your talking about someone you don't know. On a subject you know little to nothing about. All based upon what a purposely antagonistic person claimed here.
This is completely counter to your "behavior". Notice that we arent in kindergarden. JG is not a threat. How could he?
So you had credibility but you lost it.
This thread has no value. Its just an example of crybaby women trying to phuck with any man they can. I can care less if they decide to project their fears upon JG and label it his behavior.
Snowy used to defend people from being mindlessly and flimsily accused....but apparently not in this case.
Any big mystery as to why this thread has no respect? No.
Take the whiny behavior fiction bullshit somewhere else.

WELL! I guess I have been told. But wait. I have seen your posts before and they are crap. Now it is my opinion on the readings I have done of Greens posts here, in Renners blog and also in his blog based upon his behavior and treatment of other posters at those sites that I believe that he is narcissistic and a possible sociopath. You may choose to research those symptoms and agree or disagree.

It matters to me not one wit, what you might think. And you might realize that there is tons of information in these Topix forums and has been over the years. If you doubt that, look at Renners and in particulars Greens blog. Where do you think he is getting a lot of the information he is posting?

And anyone who tracks down and attempts to attach names to people who wish anonymity is nothing less than a narcissist who only want his views heard, and people who agree with him. That is textbook narcissistic behavior. The other threats both legal action and others, with no basis, show him to possibly have tendencies towards sociopathic behaviors as well. You may argue that I am not a psychiatrist and you would be correct. But I have dealt with more than my share of crazy people. So consider it a layman's diagnosis. Or look up his behaviors and see what you come up with.

Bill

Ridiculous wrote:

Can anyone verify that it was Beagle that re-posted the "Laughing Sadist" video with the new ending?

Yes, it was posted from Beagle's 112Dirtbag account.

I had a bit of fun playing with the July 26th date for a short time, and just gotta ask Beagle, does it refer to Michael Bruce Ross's birthdate? Since he was a Connecticut serial killer, I thought it was a possibility.

Sorry, my bookmark goes to what was his 112Dirtbag YouTube Account, but he has changed that account name to his full real name in case you are looking for it.

Oh, I forgot, I also thought Beagle may have posted it on July 26th in regard to Ariel Castro who pled guilty that day.

Perry Mason wrote:

<quoted text>
Bill your talking about someone you don't know. On a subject you know little to nothing about. All based upon what a purposely antagonistic person claimed here.
This is completely counter to your "behavior". Notice that we arent in kindergarden. JG is not a threat. How could he?
So you had credibility but you lost it.
This thread has no value. Its just an example of crybaby women trying to phuck with any man they can. I can care less if they decide to project their fears upon JG and label it his behavior.
Snowy used to defend people from being mindlessly and flimsily accused....but apparently not in this case.
Any big mystery as to why this thread has no respect? No.
Take the whiny behavior fiction bullshit somewhere else.

ANYONE that tries to find out someone's real identity on an online forum and goes as far as to ask other posters if they know a person's identity to email it to them is a danger to the person they are trying to out and every other poster on the forum IMHO.
And then to say that there's more to come on Citigirl because she made herself an issue by posting and Alden because he injected his name willingly into the case is appalling.
To even hint at putting personal information about someone online is totally disrespectful and shows to me that the person doing it cares absolutely nothing about the safety, privacy or reputation of fellow posters and will do anything to get information that will benefit them. This is all IMHO.

Perry Mason wrote:

<quoted text>
Bill your talking about someone you don't know. On a subject you know little to nothing about. All based upon what a purposely antagonistic person claimed here.
This is completely counter to your "behavior". Notice that we arent in kindergarden. JG is not a threat. How could he?
So you had credibility but you lost it.
This thread has no value. Its just an example of crybaby women trying to phuck with any man they can. I can care less if they decide to project their fears upon JG and label it his behavior.
Snowy used to defend people from being mindlessly and flimsily accused....but apparently not in this case.
Any big mystery as to why this thread has no respect? No.
Take the whiny behavior fiction bullshit somewhere else.

Perry, you are talking about people you don't know. Nuff' said. You have no credibility to lose.

Ridiculous wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree on all points Bill, I can't help but chuckle when I see Green trying to out L4M in one post and then encourage people to post anonymously in the very next post! He then ends the very post he has offered anonymity in by letting us know that after an exhaustive six week study, he will be exposing another famous forum poster.
I must be missing something here. Seriously. How does one write this stuff and not realize how contradictory it is? It just boggles the mind to think that he actually believes he has any credibilty with anyone wishing to remain anonymous.
I do wish Citi would just give us a heads up on how she is doing. I really don't care about her status with the family or what Green thinks about her. I am concerned.
I do hope she's alright.
I also would really like to get the low down from Renner about his honest opinion of Green at this point....?

I've also been concerned about Citigirl but I can't really blame her for not wanting to post again with the threat of "more to come" about her hanging over her head.
I would also love to hear Renner's take on his favorite poster.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
I would also love to hear Renner's take on his favorite poster.

Yes, it would have been nice to know where he stands with his poster. Of course he did give him the boot with little fanfare. Maybe that says it all.

Bill