Maura Murray

...the clock stops while you are out of the country.

hannah_b wrote:

Anybody knows the statute of limitaion on the charges Maura may have been facing? Wouldt they have run out by now? So no reason for her to hide because of this?

Six years. But it only counts when you're living in Massachusetts publicly.

in Massachusetts wrote:

...the clock stops while you are out of the country.

Or even in hiding in the state.

oops, this was published March, 2013. But that's what I mean, this is what they most currently have to say which really differs. JR thinks Maura may be alive and yet the CC team or FK think it's a recovery at this point.

Paris wrote:

oops, this was published March, 2013. But that's what I mean, this is what they most currently have to say which really differs. JR thinks Maura may be alive and yet the CC team or FK think it's a recovery at this point.

Your prior comment didn't post. Could you clarify what was published in March, 2013?

RealMikeArcuri wrote:

I just can't stop thinking of the JR post. He'll probly fly to Beauharnois in the next few days? The cats out and it wont be too long until she moves again.

He will have to fly to Montreal and then drive to Beauharnois. To JR........you might want to talk to the person who saw MM in Sherbrooke, Quebec awhile ago for a description.

I believe Beauharnois is strictly French Speaking. I wonder if Maura had studied any French.

Habs wrote:

<quoted text>
He will have to fly to Montreal and then drive to Beauharnois. To JR........you might want to talk to the person who saw MM in Sherbrooke, Quebec awhile ago for a description.

Habs, what kind of place is Beauharnois for those who've never been there?

David wrote:

<quoted text>
Habs, what kind of place is Beauharnois for those who've never been there?

I've never been there myself. I do know that cape is right about the French thing. If she didn't speak French she would really stick out.]

Sam Ledyard wrote:

<quoted text>
Your prior comment didn't post. Could you clarify what was published in March, 2013?

Sure. But I know it will be taken away again because I saw it b4 I left work for awhile! Wonder why? hmmmmmmm
I can't take the time to post my curious snippets from the article, but you can quick find so many contradictions in this interview between Fred/Caladonian.
BRB, gotta go find it.

oops again, it's the Concord.

http://www.concordmonitor.com/news/localstate...

If it goes again just google, MM, FM, March 2013 and look for concord.

They say Maura hit the guardrails for one thing, and that when the SBD pulled up, MM was outside of her car. How could they get it soooo wrong when it's so current with no update. Must be accurate is all i can think. I had never seen this one before.

"But the manner in which she left Massachusetts was cryptic. The morning of the disappearance she packed all of her belongings in boxes, placed them neatly on her dorm room bed, withdrew most of her money from her bank and emailed a professor and work supervisor that she would be taking a week off because of a death in the family. There was no such death."

JM here. Why would Fred let them print this if he didn't agree that she packed the room up?

MORE IN QUOTATIONS:

"Sometime shortly before 7:30 p.m., while driving along the northern edge of Haverhill, her car veered off the road, hit a guardrail and smashed into a stand of trees.

JM here with another comment. Why or HOW could FRED of all people let a reporter get something like "hitting a guardrail" so wrong, unless it's been established somehow as true? This whole statement reminds me of the earlier call for a female sliding off the road. Remember that? To say that she: veered off the road sounds odd. She smacked into a snowbank, didn't she? "Shaved it off"?????? so was this the "slid off the road" call? Long ago it was stated that guardrails just prior to the store were messed up, but they didn't know if MM could have done that. Finally the Saturn hit some tress. That's the story, but it sounds like it might be in cryptic order. I sure hope you can figure me out, what I'm trying to say. I'm not that best at that when I'm soooooooo bizzy.

A bus driver who lived within 100 yards of the accident scene told authorities he had spotted Maura on his way home from work, standing near the car."

JM one last time cause I have to go home. Why and HOW could Fred let them publish this misinformation? OR, once he read it, why not do an update or correction to the article? Also, part of me says some of this has got to be intentional and/or not factual for some reason. There's more but that's all I have time for right now.

Sorry everybody for now checking my quotes. Befor I shut 'er down for the night I want to quote this:

"And investigators should have consulted family members before conducting the first search; Fred said they used a pair of gloves from the Saturn as a scent, gloves that were a Christmas gift which Maura wore infrequently if at all."

JM now, this is odd too and worth a few more minutes to post it. That comment implies that Fred didn't pick out the gloves. Maybe I'm jumping the gun here and it was just a poorly writen article?

Why would any one of you believe anything that James Renner has to say? Explain that to me.

just me wrote:

Sorry everybody for now checking my quotes. Befor I shut 'er down for the night I want to quote this:
"And investigators should have consulted family members before conducting the first search; Fred said they used a pair of gloves from the Saturn as a scent, gloves that were a Christmas gift which Maura wore infrequently if at all."
JM now, this is odd too and worth a few more minutes to post it. That comment implies that Fred didn't pick out the gloves. Maybe I'm jumping the gun here and it was just a poorly writen article?

My recall is that Sharon Rausch had given Maura the gloves as a Christmas gift.

just me wrote:

[...]. That comment implies that Fred didn't pick out the gloves.[...]

In Disappeared, he says explicitly that he didn't. He says, had he been asked to select an item, he would have provided something that she had worn such as running gear.

It's in the part where he's at the site, and he walks to Atwood's house to demonstrate where the trail went cold.

So moist

Sam Ledyard wrote:

<quoted text>
In Disappeared, he says explicitly that he didn't. He says, had he been asked to select an item, he would have provided something that she had worn such as running gear.
It's in the part where he's at the site, and he walks to Atwood's house to demonstrate where the trail went cold.

Thanks. I've had it in my mind that Fred gave the gloves. I thought someone on the inside had made that part clear, my bad.
On that note, the scent was whoever picked up the glove while searching the car that night. JMHO. And when the dogs had to sniff them, they followed the walk that CS had to make to get to the SBD house. His Bronco was seen parked there w/no one around?
I was on your site today looking at pictures of the WB and the houses right around there. I thought about Maura backing up and wondered why she'd even bother. Did she need room to move around the car OR was it so another "person" couldn't miss it if they were to find out she was "stalled".

Habs wrote:

<quoted text>
He will have to fly to Montreal and then drive to Beauharnois. To JR........you might want to talk to the person who saw MM in Sherbrooke, Quebec awhile ago for a description.

'David (Whalen), says my source, has partial residence in Canada. Somewhere around Montreal/Sherbrooke.'~JR

@ just me -- You wrote: "[Smith's] Bronco was seen parked there w/no one around?"

I was unaware of this. Do you know of the source?

@ Name -- It turns out I may live in the same town as Whalen. A poster reported that he lives in Whitman, MA. I live in Whitman, close to the Abington line, which is why my geo-location appears as Abington.

Could someone clarify his significance in this case? I have never, to my knowledge, met/seen him, but I will keep an eye out for him. Perhaps I might be able to speak with him.