Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

Some Moniker wrote:

<quoted text>
So why do you think that Suzanne worked for the Globe?

Judged:

2

2

1

Tyler in Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
So I guess you're not going to point out an instance where I have "thrown stones" in the past?

Judged:

1

1

1

Some Moniker wrote:

<quoted text>
Enough bullshit. You say youre a member of the bar. Fine. You want to know peopke's names. OK. Well first you have to tell us who you are. Go ahead. Give us your real name so we can see your license. Call you at your office. FIRST.
Because there is no Samual Ledyard that has a licence in Massachusetts.
Otherwise...you're a fraud. So STFU.

Judged:

2

2

2

Some Moniker wrote:

<quoted text>
Enough bullshit. You say youre a member of the bar. Fine. You want to know peopke's names. OK. Well first you have to tell us who you are. Go ahead. Give us your real name so we can see your license. Call you at your office. FIRST.
Because there is no Samual Ledyard that has a licence in Massachusetts.
Otherwise...you're a fraud. So STFU.

Judged:

2

1

1

Tyler in Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
What's up with you ladies not backing up your statements? First Wowzer tells me I "throw stones" but won't provide an example. Then you accuse me of attempting to "breathe life" into (I presume) Renner's book. Neither of you care to elaborate on your flawed statements?
Making false claims then running away? I guess White Noise would be proud. Must be a generational thing. I'm glad they taught manners so extremely well before my time.

Judged:

2

2

2

Sam Ledyard wrote:

<quoted text>
I need to know Suzanne's real name only because I wish to speak to her. If she came on here under one of her monikers, then I wouldn't need to find her name.
I don't believe that your questions about my identity are genuine in light of our correspondence.

Judged:

2

2

2

Some Moniker wrote:

<quoted text>
STFU

Judged:

2

2

2

Tyler in Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
What's up with you ladies not backing up your statements? First Wowzer tells me I "throw stones" but won't provide an example. Then you accuse me of attempting to "breathe life" into (I presume) Renner's book. Neither of you care to elaborate on your flawed statements?
Making false claims then running away? I guess White Noise would be proud. Must be a generational thing. I'm glad they taught manners so extremely well before my time.

Tyler in Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
For example, I've recently seen regular posters here claim that Sam was John Green (false), that the backpack found by Tom wasn't real (false), that James Renner asked Sam to make contact with DW's mother (false), that we aren't genuinely interested in hearing what DW has to say (false), that John Green is still involved with the Maura Murray Community (false).
Actually Maruchan, I think you have posted most of those inaccuracies.
It's unfortunate that readers who follow this thread and Maura's case might believe some of the things you say. I do not think it's responsible of you to post about things you don't have first hand knowledge of in a way that makes it sound as if you do.
If you honestly disagree with some of the things that happen around this case... contacting DW's mother, for example, that's one thing. But to blatantly lie in an attempt to discredit genuinely helpful posters such as Sam, is extremely detrimental to the truth.
If you have any doubt about my integrity or intentions surrounding this case, I'd be more than happy to discuss my methods of research with you in private. I welcome you to PM me, email me or even give me a phone call if you'd like. I do not mean to come off as uppity when posting here, but reading falsifications of information that I know, without question, to be accurate is extremely frustrating.

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
Go find my quotes that say those exact things that you just posted and post them here. You won't be able to, because I have never said any of those things. The burden of proof is on you to prove your accusations.

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
Look, Tyler, this person already proved that I didn't say what you attributed to me. Guess you were wrong about one of those things you claim I said ... Now go find the remaining quotes where I have said the things you claim.

Judged:

1

1

1

Maruchan wrote:

This is toooooo funny.
<quoted text>
You are a pot in the kettle scenario, Tyler.
12/5/13, Page 2069,#42711
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Look at all those stones you were throwing at me. I kept reminding you, but you have never provided proof of the false claims you made against me - you just kept running away. Guess they never taught manners to your generation.
I shall now refer to you as Tyler from Potsburgh.:)

Judged:

1

1

1

Sam Ledyard wrote:

<quoted text>
I need to know Suzanne's real name only because I wish to speak to her. If she came on here under one of her monikers, then I wouldn't need to find her name.
I don't believe that your questions about my identity are genuine in light of our correspondence.

Judged:

1

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS SPEAKING TO HER IF SHE DOESN'T WANT TO SPEAK TO YOU.

Judged:

1

1

1

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
If you think anything I've ever posted has been anything less than truthful feel free to point those statements out and I'll be happy to address them.

Judged:

1

1

1

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi Eric,
Fortunately, she hasn't expressed a reluctance to comment.

Judged:

1

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

Just poped over to see what was happening on renners site. YOUR LAST CHANCE TO SEND IN YOUR FIVE DOLLARS. Reminds me of the story. A guy puts an ad in the newspaper. "Your last chance to send in your five dollars". And a P.O. box to send the money to. That was it, no promise, didn't say what you would receive. Just that it was your last chance to send in your five dollars. He made thousands. The postal service went after him but, at that time there was nothing preventing you from having idiots sending you free money. He promised nothing and there was no fraud involved. They couldn't prosecute him on anything. The postal service has since closed that loophole but it does show how easy it is to get people to give you free money.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

1

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
Not too long ago I found out the answer to a question that has bothered me for a long time. Why do so many posts seem to disappear? It never made sense to me that they were deleted, or that posters were banned.
The day I finally decided to look into it was when Tyler made a post here about John Green and the Apple Hill Inn. A very short time after he made the post, it disappeared. Not only that, his earlier posts had also disappeared. There was nothing about the post that would cause it to be deleted, and he had made no posts that would cause him to be banned. It was strange.
So I checked it out, and I found out that people with registered accounts can "hide recent posts." Isn't that interesting?
But that's not news to you, is it, Tyler?
You had a registered account, and you hid your recent posts. Why?
It is now impossible for anybody to find your earlier posts because you hid them. Is that being "truthful," hiding your words?
You created a new registered account on 12/13/13. It has the same photo, and the name has changed from "Tyler from Pittsburgh" to "Tyler in Pittsburgh" because, of course, the "from" moniker already existed and was hidden by you.
All of this, in my opinion, looks like intent to deceive Topix posters. It certainly doesn't seem like the actions of a "truthful" person to me.

Judged:

1

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, it seems you were right about that. I apologize for not saying so sooner. It appears those false statements came from other usernames.
However, I did preface my accusations with "I think." I did not claim outright that you made those posts, but based on my memory, I thought you had.
I do genuinely apologize for my mistake in that instance.

Judged:

2

2

1

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
if you haven't seen it already, The Wolf of Wall Street provides an enlightening and entertaining window to the high life....fortunes made from swindlers selling penny stocks.

Judged:

2

2

2

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi Eric,
Fortunately, she hasn't expressed a reluctance to comment.