Maura Murray

Booneplantation wrote:

<quoted text> Listen people: yall a bunch of very intelligent people although yall get stuck with one another trying to smart one another. If yall get bored, go to to the MacStay sites and see what yall can contribute!! That is one complex case and they need brains like yours there!!! Urgently!!!!

That's a good idea.

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Here's the reality of the situation. I make no assumptions.

Except about Suzanne.

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
"Suzanne" lied in a post that she authored...

You don't know it was Suzanne.

Sam Ledyard wrote:

<quoted text>
It's quite obvious that you don't like my theory; but I still don't know why. I've considered many possibilities; maybe you were friends with (or actually were) Suzanne. Maybe you wish you had solved the mystery yourself. None of those theories makes sense.
Whatever your position is, it's clearly clouded by your emotions. I welcome a debate, but there's no reason to personally attack me. I haven't done that to you.

"No Worries" is not the only person that disagrees with you.
We all know that you don't know why.
And no, you're not even close to guessing.

Skunki wrote:

<quoted text>
Except about Suzanne.
<quoted text>
You don't know it was Suzanne.

That's why Suzanne is in quotations.

Booneplantation wrote:

<quoted text> Listen people: yall a bunch of very intelligent people.

Thank you for this.

Wormser wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you for this.

So funny I forgot to laugh.

just another thought.
one may have knowledge about the identities of other posters for having somehow been in contact, whether online, by phone or in person, but it is what one does with that info that is important.
over the years, i've come to know of various individuals; i choose not to reveal their personal info, especially if it would be harmful to them. i don't need to be told to be discreet.

a number of others conduct themselves by this same standard, also without being told to do so.
pretty much, it's been the last crop of sleuthers that conduct themselves differently...poorly.

yes, much info is found online, but it doesn't need to be carried or shared without a very good purpose. the conversation is about Maura Murray at its most basic, not hunting down other posters.
to pre-judge them as guilty of some perceived intent or offense is not justification for bad behaviors and poor journalistic practices.

I haven't been here for a few years is there anything new?

Sam Ledyard wrote:

<quoted text>
That's essentially my position, yes. The lie concerning the author's identity is relevant on the issue of her credibility as well as the letter's veracity.

Ok. So since you do not post using your "real identity" then your posts here and on your blog are not credible. I think I get it now, thank you for the clarity.

Bluesman wrote:

I haven't been here for a few years is there anything new?

Other than people making things up on for profit blogs. No. Nothing. Some leads chased down in 2004, searches, etc. But nothing new since then. Some people think that using the 10 year anniversary of a disappearance for a book release is a great marketing ploy. There is not one thing that has been "discovered" that hasn't been written about ad nauseam for these last ten years. Unless you want to include the absurd run to Montreal to chase down a "lead". Amazingly he was able to find that there might be someone who looks like Maura in a city of 1.6 million people. Who would have thought?

Bill

Pssssst.

Hey mack.

I've got what you need!

Rewind wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok. So since you do not post using your "real identity" then your posts here and on your blog are not credible. I think I get it now, thank you for the clarity.

Get it.......you deeeew.

Oh and lets not forget. You last chance (6 days left) to give him your $5. Actually I think he is asking for a preferred donation of $10. But he will accept any amount. And then there are the idiots on the site who want to know why the Murray's aren't selling everything to participate in this charade. Again, isn't it interesting how much renner has donated? Has anyone seen where he has said how much he is donating? I'd love to know. I mean like I said before, if it was my idea and I thought that it had any merit I wouldn't be begging for money on the internet. I'd fund it myself. But hey, that is me.

Bill

https://www.youtube.com/watch...
Free tickets.

WTH-the-original wrote:

Again, isn't it interesting how much renner has donated? Has anyone seen where he has said how much he is donating? I'd love to know. I mean like I said before, if it was my idea and I thought that it had any merit I wouldn't be begging for money on the internet. I'd fund it myself. But hey, that is me.
Bill

I would think if this was really a good idea the publisher would be getting involved. Get the topic out there for a book, and also write the "donation" off as marketing.

Just my opinion.

WTH-the-original wrote:

Oh and lets not forget. You last chance (6 days left) to give him your $5. Actually I think he is asking for a preferred donation of $10. But he will accept any amount. And then there are the idiots on the site who want to know why the Murray's aren't selling everything to participate in this charade. Again, isn't it interesting how much renner has donated? Has anyone seen where he has said how much he is donating? I'd love to know. I mean like I said before, if it was my idea and I thought that it had any merit I wouldn't be begging for money on the internet. I'd fund it myself. But hey, that is me.
Bill

James donated $50, according to the donation list.

Chris wrote:

<quoted text>
James donated $50, according to the donation list.

WOW!$50. Well that is putting your money where your mouth is. That is a single nice dinner his family won't be eating. I think some of his followers have donated considerably more than that though. Just out of curiosity do we know when he donated that money?

Bill

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I would think if this was really a good idea the publisher would be getting involved. Get the topic out there for a book, and also write the "donation" off as marketing.
Just my opinion.

Like you said. If they thought that it was a good idea. I'll let people draw their own conclusions. Leading a horse and all that.

Bill

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Just out of curiosity do we know when he donated that money?
Bill

The day after he started the fund. All the donation amounts and contributors are shown on the GoFundMe page.

Somebody just donated another $200, bringing the total to $1,865.00.

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
The day after he started the fund. All the donation amounts and contributors are shown on the GoFundMe page.
Somebody just donated another $200, bringing the total to $1,865.00.

Excellent. So $1815 donated by everyone else. So he was willing to donate 1% of what he was asking for. Again, very impressive.

I know I could go there. I want nothing to do with that site. For all I know he is later going to use the list of people who visited to surf for possible "perps", research them, and then include their names in his book.

Bill