Maura Murray

Sam, explain the difference between the geocities post and the Swartz post.

Why the manhunt for "Suzanne" to explain her/his fraudulent misrepresentation but not "Swartz" for his/hers?

Sam Ledyard wrote:

But since you've put my character at issue, I think that I should mention this. The first comment on this thread to be deleted was one of yours (as "cool dude")--
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
It takes a disturbed individual, like you, to come up with something like that.

Sam Ledyard wrote:

<quoted text>
And look at us now -- five months later, Tyler's as much a part of the blog as I am and, this week, John Green's writing a post for the blog. John and I have had our differences. But I'm certain that his opinion of me has changed.
I'm still waiting for that email.

John Green wrote:

"And like I said, I am VERY glad to see that you respond positively...that REALLY increases your credibility."

John Green wrote:

"...when I did not see my comment as "pending moderation" on your site (i.e., deleted, I thought), I wondered if you were dodging it...."

Maruchan wrote:

"You went there to find out where DW is. You offered to do so in Renner's thread in which he implied that DW is the person who took Maura from the accident scene where he set her up in his part-time abode, where he implied that the Londonderry "ping" was DW calling Maura on the way to meet her in Woodsville. You stated in your blog post that "I further explained that James is reaching out to Maura’s friends to hear about their memories of Maura" and that is EXACTLY what you did. You LIED TO DW'S mother about your intentions, and you LIED TO HER by giving her a false name.

You are a liar and are completely unethical and unscrupulous."

Hmmm...disturbed individual.

Next who is this Swartz and what did they do?

I see two significant differences between the posts.

First, there had already been an attempt to identify observer and citigirl was named. Had observer posted on my blog (which is the case with Swartz), I never would have released information about him. So I felt that there was an error that needed to be fixed.

Second, he made Suzanne appear to be a credible source; a journalist. Observer, too, was represented as being a friend of Maura's. The Swartz post lacks credibility. The fake email address entered, for example, was hangingaaronswarts. It was a dark joke; lacking credibility. This is important to me because Suzanne's post got a lot of people's hopes up.

@ skunki:

John's comment was approved. I'm not sure what your point is.

Maruchan misjudged my intentions. I went to the house hoping to speak to Dave; not his mother. If Dave had been living there, it would have put an end to this Canada theory much earlier. When I couldn't accomplish that, I began looking into observer ...

Samuel Ledyard wrote:

@ skunki:
John's comment was approved. I'm not sure what your point is.
Maruchan misjudged my intentions. I went to the house hoping to speak to Dave; not his mother. If Dave had been living there, it would have put an end to this Canada theory much earlier. When I couldn't accomplish that, I began looking into observer ...

Fraudyard,
Assuming we are correct about your intentions, why should anyone believe you?
Why has only yourself and Observer pushed the Canada theory? Why wouldn't we conclude you are Observer? Are you accusing anyone that converses with you adversely because you are desperate?

Answer it!

Answer the question Fraudyard!

there are appropriate and inappropriate reasons and opportunities to reach out to strangers. clearly, Maruchan did the right thing to forewarn a mother that unscrupulous individuals were in pursuit of her son.

the threat to reveal Maruchan's identity is another example of shameless harassment of targeted strangers and online posters. bullying.

and, yet, "Ledyard" holds his own identity tightly.

his life, his karma, his bad.

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
How do you have so much time to spend on the internet? I wish I had that much leisure time. Imagine all the beneficial things you could be doing other than wasting your life as a worthless, skill-less troll. I hope my life isn't that pathetic when I'm your age.

Tyler from Pittsburgh wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
....Here's the reality of the situation. I make no assumptions......

Do you or don't you? I say you do. Well, I guess you say you do, too.

Benjamin Franklyne wrote:

<quoted text>
Why has only yourself and Observer pushed the Canada theory? Why wouldn't we conclude you are Observer?

I've never pushed it. Quite the opposite.

Benjamin Franklyne wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you accusing anyone that converses with you adversely because you are desperate?

I have only one person in mind.

SnowyB wrote:

the threat to reveal Maruchan's identity is another example of shameless harassment of targeted strangers and online posters. bullying.
and, yet, "Ledyard" holds his own identity tightly.
his life, his karma, his bad.

Your bad. You've completely made this up. I've never expressed any interest in Maruchan's identity.

Further, I've made it very clear that I will never reveal information about posters. I never have; I never will.

Fraudyard,
Assuming we are correct about your intentions, why should anyone believe you?
Why has only yourself and Observer pushed the Canada theory? Why wouldn't we conclude you are Observer? Are you accusing anyone that converses with you adversely because you are desperate?

https://www.youtube.com/watch...

Suzanne wrote:

Fraudyard,
Assuming we are correct about your intentions, why should anyone believe you?

Assuming that I'm not to be trusted should I be trusted? No.

[QUOTE who="adagio] Why has only yourself and Observer pushed the Canada theory?
[/QUOTE]

I have never pushed the Canada theory.

whitenoise wrote:

Why wouldn't we conclude you are Observer?

I suppose because it would be unreasonable to do so. But, hey, I have no control over your thoughts.

[QUOTE who="?"] Are you accusing anyone that converses with you adversely ...?
[/QUOTE]

I have only one person in mind, Ben.

Let's talk, Ben.

Suzanne posted (at least) three times as "testing" or tester. Twice in South Dakota; once in Utica.

Here, she posted in Utica: http://www.topix.com/forum/city/utica-ny/THHN... .

You of course are "Live from Utica": http://www.topix.com/forum/city/franconia-nh/...

[More to come].

Here are her 3 other testing posts from South Dakota:

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/rapid-city-sd...

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/rapid-city-sd...

Here you are in South Dakota: http://www.topix.com/forum/city/rapid-city-sd... .

So there are two conclusions I can reach. Either Suzanne is falling you around, or you are Suzanne.

Your bizarre reaction to my Suzanne posts (you stopped emailing me at that point) as well as your compulsion for YouTube links suggests the latter.

As you've stated, Suzanne could have been using proxies. You know a thing or two about them.

*following you around.