Maura Murray

Jenkins wrote:

There was a poster on here that claimed to have heard an earlier accident on the scanner that night around 7pm. She was very believable & she is not the only person who heard this accident, contrary to what wowzer says there are other people from the area who heard an earlier accident on their scanners. Whether this was Maura is unknown but it makes sense considering the damage to her car.
Look at the damage to her car, it clearly wasn't a snow bank or tree that caused all the damage. There is damage below her bumper, this is consistent with hitting a snowbank. Then her bumper is undamaged & above her bumper her hood is pushed into a sharp dent that's gotta be at least 6" deep, a tree can't do this, it's physically impossible. Maybe, possibly a snow bank could somehow cause it? Maybe it's possible but that damage to the hood is not consistent with a snowbank hit, & after living in NH for 12yrs I've seen A LOT of damage from snowbanks.
So we got people who say they heard an earlier accident at 7pm & we have damage to her car that is more consistent with 2 accidents than 1. Does this mean she definitely crashed earlier? No, but there's a good chance that she did. It's at LEAST something that should be considered.
Also consider the fact that all of the very earliest news reports, including a quote from HPD cheif Williams, have the accident happening at or just after 7pm, it was later reports that had the time pushed back to 7:30, be it accurately or eroneously. Something else that's interesting & indicates that an earlier crash at 7 very well may have happened.
I've been following this case since day 1, way back in '04 it was my gut instinct that this earlier accident did happen & it has something to do with her disappearance; & honestly it still is my gut instinct. Just looking at the pics of the car & considering the timing & statements from people I just can't shake the feeling that these are all not just coincidences, idk but it seems like you need to overlook a lot of coincidences to write this off. They very well may be, but idk.

John Blue wrote:

<quoted text>
HEY! nhbiguy2587 is a personal friend. Leave him alone. He's a catch.

Scanner Guy wrote:

This one is "towel dry."

John Blue wrote:

<quoted text>
I mean, Jenkins.

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh I can find it..I just might give you too much..By accident,really.

John Blue wrote:

<quoted text>
I have a feeling they've encountered each other. I could say more, but I shouldn't.

Jenkins wrote:

Oh yea & you need to look at the original pictures that were taken by the North Country News just days after her disappearance, these are the only accurate pictures available.
NHSP Troop F took her car as evidence & somehow while in their possession the car has sustained quite a lot of damage, the newer pics taken in '07 or '09, iirc, show a lot more damage. And coincidentally, all the damage sustained while in their possession just happens to be to her bumper right where the accident damage was, effectively ruining any & all evidentiary value the car contained when they took possession of the vehicle. I don't wanna say they were involved or are covering anything up in this case but I'm sorry, that's SHADY, SUPER SHADY. Yet another coincidence no doubt, right? Idk, I really don't want to believe that they are covering anything up, & most of me believes they aren't. But then there's a part of me that looks at this and just says WTF IS GOING ON HERE??? Do items being held as evidence routinely get damaged while in the NHSP's possession or is this one of the only items? Something is wrong with this picture & it's really freakin sad that there's no journalist that's willing to ask these tough questions that the NHSP should have to answer.
How the hell does a car being held as evidence get so much damage? Seriously, how the hell does that even happen?? I'm racking my brain trying to think of an innocent reason for that to happen & I really can't.
Even still that wouldn't prove any sort of conspiracy, for the record. It's just another aspect to this case that is highly unusual & just looks bad, totally sketchy.

John Blue wrote:

John Travolta is a close, personal friend.

John Blue wrote:

<quoted text>
You're going to like the way you look.
I guarantee it.

John Blue wrote:

<quoted text>
It wouldn't be the first time someone fell in love on a Maura Murray thread...

Red Riding-Hood wrote:

<quoted text>
Shady.

John Blue wrote:

<quoted text>
It's Blue.

John Blue wrote:

<quoted text>
It wouldn't be the first time someone fell in love on a Maura Murray thread...

John Blue wrote:

<quoted text>
Is Tom Cruise tall?