Maura Murray

Judged:

2

Burlington Bound wrote:

Show's over.

Sam Ledyard wrote:

<quoted text>
Who is this? The list of possible people you could be is now extremely short.
At this point, why not reveal your identity?

Judged:

2

2

2

Jenkins wrote:

You can't ignore evidence Bill, you constantly gloss over the fact that the damage was to her front left even though that is actually the least likely corner of the vehicle to sustain damage after spinning out around a left hand turn. You also blatantly ignore the fact that in the original pictures there's no damage to her bumper yet damage above & below it. You're correct that there's no obvious indication of metal to metal contact, but you're missing the forest for the trees when you constantly harp on that one stupid point.

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Some time back a woman,local to the area,reported hearing an earlier scanner communication involving an accident just before the WB accident.You might get acquainted with everything if you dig in&read all thats here..

Jenkins wrote:

There was a poster on here that claimed to have heard an earlier accident on the scanner that night around 7pm. She was very believable & she is not the only person who heard this accident, contrary to what wowzer says there are other people from the area who heard an earlier accident on their scanners. Whether this was Maura is unknown but it makes sense considering the damage to her car.
Look at the damage to her car, it clearly wasn't a snow bank or tree that caused all the damage. There is damage below her bumper, this is consistent with hitting a snowbank. Then her bumper is undamaged & above her bumper her hood is pushed into a sharp dent that's gotta be at least 6" deep, a tree can't do this, it's physically impossible. Maybe, possibly a snow bank could somehow cause it? Maybe it's possible but that damage to the hood is not consistent with a snowbank hit, & after living in NH for 12yrs I've seen A LOT of damage from snowbanks.
So we got people who say they heard an earlier accident at 7pm & we have damage to her car that is more consistent with 2 accidents than 1. Does this mean she definitely crashed earlier? No, but there's a good chance that she did. It's at LEAST something that should be considered.
Also consider the fact that all of the very earliest news reports, including a quote from HPD cheif Williams, have the accident happening at or just after 7pm, it was later reports that had the time pushed back to 7:30, be it accurately or eroneously. Something else that's interesting & indicates that an earlier crash at 7 very well may have happened.
I've been following this case since day 1, way back in '04 it was my gut instinct that this earlier accident did happen & it has something to do with her disappearance; & honestly it still is my gut instinct. Just looking at the pics of the car & considering the timing & statements from people I just can't shake the feeling that these are all not just coincidences, idk but it seems like you need to overlook a lot of coincidences to write this off. They very well may be, but idk.

FYI wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
from the Facebook page:
Helena Dwyer Murray
****-_--_-FYI...I've been given permission to pass this information along. A while ago, a professional accident re-constructionist examined Maura's vehicle. This is his conclusion, based on the condition of the vehicle AND the black box: "He concluded that there was only one event...at the red barn. She hit a snow bank only. No trees and no prior damage to the vehicle."

Judged:

1

1

1

FYI wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
from the Facebook page:
Helena Dwyer Murray
****-_--_-FYI...I've been given permission to pass this information along. A while ago, a professional accident re-constructionist examined Maura's vehicle. This is his conclusion, based on the condition of the vehicle AND the black box: "He concluded that there was only one event...at the red barn. She hit a snow bank only. No trees and no prior damage to the vehicle."