Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

Granny M wrote:

Ridic besides meeting at Police station lol got to be kidding. lets get it on big guy lol. Gal

Judged:

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

A weekend, a full moon, some booze and a computer. A perfect combo to make an as* out of yourself.
If nothing else it is entertaining to watch.

Judged:

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

Hey Ridiculous, since you're going to be up this way working you'll have to try the G&H Pizza on Main St in Lincoln. Just past Dunkin Donuts on the left by stop light.
They make the best steak grinders and pizza in the area.

Judged:

2

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:

The work of a madman.......OR NOT....?
https://www.youtube.com/watch...

Judged:

1

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Is this what detective columbo really looks like?

Judged:

1

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Apparently, someone doesn't know about 'overcorrection". The physics about that is very well understood and not unlikely in this type of crash though there are other possibilities. The physics of it doesn't really need to be explained. The terminal part of the crash is documented very well in that excellent report. And that is what was documented. The terminal portion of the crash. Again, how is how the car got there relate to where Maura got to, minutes, hours, days later?
Bill

Det Columbo wrote:

The Saturn did not hit the tree @ the weathered Barn corner.
The accident was staged at the scene.
There was a red truck @ The stage Stop Store.
There was a red truck parked beside the rd. on BHR. with the passenger side door open.
There was NO SEARCH east of BHR the evening of Feb 9th 2004.
The accident report is wrong.
Who was really driving the car that Butch Atwood saw. Was it Maura or someone else.?
Why was the #001 nose to nose with the Saturn that evening per a witness. YET THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT VEHICLE SHOULD HAVE BEEN IN SERVICE.
Smith was driving the #002 cruiser....A SEDAN.
Was there another person in the Saturn that night. Was there a person telling Maura/the female what to say.?
Lots of unanswered questions.
http://s515.photobucket.com/user/ispyeverywhe...
John

Judged:

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
Yo ass is question bout how tha fuck dis is related ta where Maura ended up is valid & a phat point, & I don't straight-up know dat it has anythang ta do wit anything, mah gut instinct is dat it probably has not a god damn thang ta do wit her dissapearance.

But dat don't mean we shouldn't review tha five-o report & point up any glarin errors up in dat shit. Dude itz hilarious when you call tha report 'pimpin', keep right at all dat shiznit it do is make it blatantly obvious dat you not bein truthful & you KNOW whatz bein holla'd. Y'all KNOW dat shit, muthafucka!

I obviously KNOW oversteer, come on yo, but dat still don't explain where her hoopty ended up or how tha fuck tha damage was ta tha front drivers side.

NOBODY disputes her hoopty was parked goin tha wack way or dat she ended up ass end tha fuck into tha snowbank, dem is two of tha only facts dat aren't disputed up in dis case. Well if she ended up wit her rear end up in tha bank up in a gangbangin' finger-lickin' direction where dat biiiiatch was facin WB up in tha EB lane then when tha hell did dat freaky freaky biatch hit tha trees & cause damage ta tha front drivers side?

Do you straight-up not KNOW dat these two thangs is mutually exclusive, biatch? If dat biiiiatch went all up in tha bank & hit tha trees wit her front left how tha fuck did da hoe bounce back out, spin round & then back tha fuck into tha bank?

How tha fuck can you possibly NOT KNOW this, biatch? Yo ass don't need ta break up some wack physics rap bout oversteer dat make it SOUND like you know what tha fuck tha hell you rappin' bout but straight-up all tha physics you rappin' bout mean not a god damn thang up in relation ta tha topic fo' realz. All you need ta do is explain how tha fuck dat thugged-out biiiatch can damage tha front left of her hoopty & then end up rear end up in tha snowbank, biatch?
How tha fuck can his bangin report possibly be 'pimpin' if it don't explain tha damage ta her car?

Judged:

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
You're question about how this is related to where Maura ended up is valid & a good point, & I don't really know that it has anything to do with anything, my gut instinct is that it probably has nothing to do with her dissapearance.
But that doesn't mean we shouldn't review the police report & point out any glaring errors in it. Dude it's hilarious when you call the report 'excellent', keep right at it all it does is make it blatantly obvious that you're not being truthful & you understand what's being said.
I obviously understand oversteer, come on, but that still doesn't explain where her car ended up or how the damage was to the front drivers side.
NOBODY disputes her car was parked going the wrong way or that she ended up ass end into the snowbank, those are two of the only facts that aren't disputed in this case. Well if she ended up with her rear end in the bank in a direction where she was facing WB in the EB lane then when the hell did she hit the trees & cause damage to the front drivers side?
Do you really not understand that these two things are mutually exclusive? If she went through the bank & hit the trees with her front left how did she bounce back out, spin around & then back into the bank?
How can you possibly NOT understand this? You don't need to break out some stupid physics talk about oversteer that makes it SOUND like you know what the hell you're talking about but really all the physics you're talking about mean nothing in relation to the topic. All you need to do is explain how she can damage the front left of her car & then end up rear end in the snowbank?
How can his report possibly be 'excellent' if it doesn't explain the damage to her car?

Judged:

1

1

1

First Mate Columbo wrote:

<quoted text>
ARRRRR...ye matey be wrong 'n always gunna be.
Face th' facts.
th' ship did not hit th' tree.
ye be knowin''tis to be th' truth....YET ye push th' lie 'o th' ship hittin' th' tree.

Why be 'tis Bill.? ye have an agenda 'n We all be knowin' it.

whar be ye bucko FrmLE..?

He seems to have faded away, lost in th' midst 'o th' many. wit'

His anger ISSUES....I would not be surprised at all to find he be behind these threats.

FrmLE be definitely 'o Questionable character.

Who be Bill / WTH really.

NOT WHO HE SAYS HE be.

Bill be outed.

It be 'bout the hour.

Walk the plank matey....

B00gerGr33n wrote:

<quoted text>
I abstain