Maura Murray

Judged:

2

2

1

JenkinsItsProbably wrote:

not prolly
>> probably <<

Judged:

2

2

2

Det Columbo wrote:

<quoted text>
Wowzer.....Once Joe and I have talked and compared notes then I will share this info with everyone. At this point I can not elaborate anymore.
All this really does mean something. Know it is hard to follow but these creeps are messing up and they don't even know it. We have a mutual friend who is neutral and feeding both sides and filtering info to the right people.
Time will tell. The end results will be worth the wait.
Also....When the hell is spring coming. Almost out of oil again. Damn
John

Judged:

5

5

4

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
You and I have a friend on Topix??? Wow that's a surprise. LOL
I've been trying to answer questions that you've asked so how bout you letting me know who our mutual friend is. I know you won't believe it but for what it's worth it will stay between you and I. I'm aware of someone sitting on the fence and playing both sides but not sure if it's the same one.
Oh and I think I know who you are but not to worry, it won't go anywhere.

Judged:

2

2

2

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Is this another open promise? I'd still like you to tie in your working theory about the police cruiser "nose to nose" "who was in car 505" "the car didn't hit the tree" WTH the original is "covering for someone" and ofcourse these videos you keep making a big deal of.
Can you please give us this working theory. Do you have a working theory? or do you just throw out any garbage you want and not have to hold yourself accountable for any of it?

Judged:

1

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry....It is a promise, but not to You someone who continues to push My buttons.
You have never contributed a thing to this forum other than to criticize people. Sit back and wait to pounce. You are like a backseat driver. Not Needed.!

Judged:

3

3

3

Fact wrote:

<quoted text>
No one has contributed towards finding Maura. All that remains is to limit the pointless arguing.

Judged:

2

2

2

Det Columbo wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry....It is a promise, but not to You someone who continues to push My buttons.
You have never contributed a thing to this forum other than to criticize people. Sit back and wait to pounce. You are like a backseat driver. Not Needed.!

Judged:

2

2

2

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text> dumb posts that you just blurt out

Judged:

2

2

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
All the contributions happened years ago. There has been nothing new to see (or add) here in years except for made up stuff and visions of sugarplums dancing in some peoples head. The "arguing" is necessary to keep the information that is true and known from being blended into the bullshit. If the bullshit ended, I guarantee that no one would be writing here at all. It would cease as entertainment and it would be strictly a police matter which is what it really is.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

1

Franconia Sinatra wrote:

<quoted text>
the contributions must have been meager towards what we all hope for, resolution.
I agree it really is a law enforcement matter, time has shown the mind hive incapable of the task. You have tried to point this out all along, as well as a few others. I was late to come to this realization.

Franconia Sinatra wrote:

<quoted text>
I have observed that mankind does not handle unresolvable issues very well. History is repeating itself here on smaller, less violent scale. Over time, several inconsistent beliefs have been expressed and acted upon here, leaving no resolution, but instead, unhappy people in their wake. This is both a tragedy for mankind and evidence of its unquenchable thirst for knowledge.
The recent threats, questioning of another's "true identity," non-germane discussions about individuals indirectly related to the disappearance, intense people searches, unsolicited contacts with unrelated individuals, speculation as to what another researcher "really knows" or has done plus the personally driven infighting that appears in posts here are the tragic results of this public inquiry.
This public discussion has produced far more victims than answers.

Judged:

1

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>

Please contribute: I'd still like you to tie in your working theory about the police cruiser "nose to nose" "who was in car 505" "the car didn't hit the tree" WTH the original is "covering for someone" and ofcourse these videos you keep making a deal of.

Judged:

1

1

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
This is hilarious, it really is.
When you say it like that it's great & it's so true, it just sounds so ridiculous.
I would absolutely love to see him answer your question & tell us his working theory tying in those different theories he seems to have.
And was he not implying a few pages back that he has all sorts of info he's holding back? The whole people being tricky in order to get info lately comment, what else could that mean? How can people try to be sneaky to get info that doesn't exist? Based on his more recent post about 'waiting to hear through the grapevine who killed MM' comment I'm gonna go ahead & assume that it doesn't.
I like to think Columbo truly means well & is just kind of a weirdo, & that's probably true, but some of the crap he says is out there & some of the things he says & does just leaves me scratching my head waging WTF?

Judged:

1

1

1

Sinead OComment wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, in some regard I stand corrected but to what degree is unknown. I say the following without judging the instigators: the contributions must have been meager towards what we all hope for, resolution.
I agree it really is a law enforcement matter, time has shown the mind hive incapable of the task. You have tried to point this out all along, as well as a few others. I was late to come to this realization.
I have observed that mankind does not handle unresolvable issues very well. History is repeating itself here on smaller, less violent scale. Over time, several inconsistent beliefs have been expressed and acted upon here, leaving no resolution, but instead, unhappy people in their wake. This is both a tragedy for mankind and evidence of its unquenchable thirst for knowledge.
The recent threats, questioning of another's "true identity," non-germane discussions about individuals indirectly related to the disappearance, intense people searches, unsolicited contacts with unrelated individuals, speculation as to what another researcher "really knows" or has do ne plus the personally driven infighting that appears in posts here are the tragic results of this public inquiry.
This public discussion has produced far more victims than answers.