“"CONFUSION CENTRAL"”
Since: Dec 11
Franconia NH
|
Please wait...
Det Columbo wrote: <quoted text> YES...That is exactly what I am trying to say. Certain people are doing exactly this. I on the other hand am not. Sorry You see My posts this way. Bill and His gang of ghost peppers have kept the heat on posters for 10 years. HAVEN'T YOU EVER WONDERED WHY THIS HAPPENS.? WHAT DID MAURA MURRAY KNOW OR GET HERSELF INVOLVED IN THAT WOULD HAVE THESE PEOPLE SURVEIL THIS SITE AND ALL THE OTHERS FOR 10 YRS. Why do they feel the need to stick around.? They are like the FORUM POLICE...yet they are not normal police, kinda like a secret group of some sort. John Wowzer should have been EXCLUDED from this list as I do not feel He/She is part of any group. Wowzer is His/Her own person and I have learned that over the years. My apology for putting YOU IN THIS GROUP WOWZER. Sincerely, John
|
Jenkins
Brooklyn, NY
|
WTH-the-original wrote: It never ceases to amaze how people with the weakest arguments or cases. Always seem to attribute to others powers that are beyond possibility. How does one apply "heat" over the internet? I'll tell you how to apply "heat". I do it all the time and I am going to let everyone in on the secret. You ask questions! That's it. Listen to the stupid things they say, and then ask them about it. That will throw them into an absolute tizzy. You know how they are in an absolute panic? Because of redirection. Instead of answering the questions they accuse you of applying "heat" or being a troll. I'll say it again. I will put any of my posts against any of their posts, any time and let them stand on their merits. When did questions become "heat" or trolling? You kind of have to ask yourself about people that are so afraid of questions that make accusations like that? Bill Lmao wow bill you REALLY need to go back & read your posts over the years because this is EXACTLY what you do. You will NEVER admit that you're wrong, and you'll NEVER admit someone is right if they don't agree with your preconceptions. Instead you resort to name calling & changing the subject. You either call the person stupid or you avoid the question & use big words to explain something else. Perfect example: you calling the police report 'excellent'. I pointed out that it directly contradicts what the witnesses said & asked you how a vehicle can crash into a tree with its front end while at the same tome ending up ass end into a snowbank. You STILL have never actually answered the question & instead choosing to avoid the question entirely & start talking about over correction lol, yea no shit she over-corrected, you gotta be a real genius to figure that one out. Funniest part about the angry band of misfit trolls that live on topix is how big of hypocrites all of you are, it's a daily occurence at least one of you criticizing someone for doing something that you do all the time.
|
mel-rose
Bentonville, AR
|
|
mel-rose
Bentonville, AR
|
|
mel-rose
Bentonville, AR
|
hoW d0es i.t chanGe anytHinG?,\\:?\\
|
mel-rose
Bentonville, AR
|
yoU ll never kNow >>will .y.O.u?//:\\?\\?
|
Sinead OComment
Palo Alto, CA
|
mel-rose wrote: //does i.t matter//:?:// By asking a reasonable question like this, you only prove you are guilty of disagreeing.
|
Sinead OComment
Palo Alto, CA
|
As to what you are disagreeing with, this is unimportant.
|
“"CONFUSION CENTRAL"”
Since: Dec 11
Franconia NH
|
Please wait...
Judged:
2
Seems like ole BILLY V. Got lost in the mix. Where did You go anyway. Thought We were just getting started on our way to a meaningful relationship. Did I say something to scare You off.? John
|
clatite
Bucharest, Romania
|
Judged:
1
1
i would,, i ll let you know :) >>pomKik<<
|
clatite
Bucharest, Romania
|
Judged:
1
// wrong tHreaD // 00ps,,
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Det Columbo wrote: But REALLY..... The Saturn did not hit the trees. So what then did the drunk driver hit?
|
Frank Abignale
Santa Clara, CA
|
Judged:
1
Det Columbo wrote: Seems like ole BILLY V. Got lost in the mix. Where did You go anyway. Thought We were just getting started on our way to a meaningful relationship. Did I say something to scare You off.? John Do you concur?
|
“"CONFUSION CENTRAL"”
Since: Dec 11
Franconia NH
|
Please wait...
Lighthouse 101 wrote: <quoted text> So what then did the drunk driver hit? Maybe We should ask the FIRST officer to the scene of the site the Saturn was found that evening. Not the 2cd. officer, the 1st one. I bet this officer knows for sure. John
|
Hibernia
Santa Clara, CA
|
The Cranberries - Zombie: http://youtu.be/6Ejga4kJUts Det Columbo wrote: <quoted text> Maybe We should ask the FIRST officer to the scene of the site the Saturn was found that evening. Not the 2cd. officer, the 1st one. I bet this officer knows for sure. John Whaaaats in your heaeaead?
|
“"CONFUSION CENTRAL"”
Since: Dec 11
Franconia NH
|
Please wait...
Hibernia wrote: The Cranberries - Zombie: http://youtu.be/6Ejga4kJUts <quoted text> Whaaaats in your heaeaead? What is Your issue Mr. Hollywood.? That hot CA sun is toasting those brain cells.
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Det Columbo wrote: <quoted text> Maybe We should ask the FIRST officer to the scene of the site the Saturn was found that evening. Not the 2cd. officer, the 1st one. I bet this officer knows for sure. John So the officer "knows for sure" but on what basis do YOU know for sure.
|
“"CONFUSION CENTRAL"”
Since: Dec 11
Franconia NH
|
Please wait...
Judged:
1
Lighthouse 101 wrote: <quoted text> So the officer "knows for sure" but on what basis do YOU know for sure. So I said....I'd bet. Do You want to bet or not..? John
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Det Columbo wrote: <quoted text> So I said....I'd bet. Do You want to bet or not..? John If i understand the good det. He is implying that another officer was there before Smith? Another turd thrown. Even IF another L.E. arrived on scene first (Moynihan?), Smith was lead so how does this change anything? Stop trying to talk in code. You really suck at it. As always, we will ask again, to just say what you are trying to say with out the undue drama. Bill
|
oo00oo
Tucson, AZ
|
WTH-the-original wrote: <quoted text> If i understand the good det. He is implying that another officer was there before Smith? Another turd thrown. Even IF another L.E. arrived on scene first (Moynihan?), Smith was lead so how does this change anything? Stop trying to talk in code. You really suck at it. As always, we will ask again, to just say what you are trying to say with out the undue drama. Bill It's turd code Bill, and if you don't understand it, you are the idiot.....not. His only function in the CCU was to report back what (little) he uncovered in his "investigation" So if he was doing his job, he would have reported his "suspicions" to the appropriate people, in which case , Moynihan is roaming free on this earth. So I guess his finger pointing is unfounded. He is obviously here to entertain himself, as he has no other function in life.
|
|