Maura Murray

Det Columbo wrote:

The evidence will show in the end......and then we will discuss this further.
Thanx....John smith
<quoted text>

and, with all due respect, that's fine. maybe i'm just not privy to the information you have, so my conclusions are made with incomplete info. i've been known to be wrong, and admit it.
hope you're having a good weekend.

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
if i met you, i didn't necessarily examine your credentials. eventually, someone offered (unsolicited) info that it wasn't the "truth".
it seems disingenuous for you to make accusations against various individuals over many years about the disappearance of MM.
that you flip around like a fish, pointing in one direction, then another, tells me you don't know what you're talking about, and that you don't mind sullying the reputation of people you know in your area.
you stir the pot, and keep it just under boiling.
why?
there is no evidence to suggest a local / dirtbag took her, but you've been playing it for years.
i just think that's irresponsible.
at the same time, if no one else cares to challenge what you present, that's all good, too.

It goes like this. If you tell yourself a lie over and over again you drift farther and farther away from the truth. The new axiom that Det Columbo uses is so far past knowledge, fact, and reason he pretty much talks to himself.

Just my opinion.

But yet You are still here and commenting on My posts......So ummmmmm

Let's Me think for a second......Your bad.!

John

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
It goes like this. If you tell yourself a lie over and over again you drift farther and farther away from the truth. The new axiom that Det Columbo uses is so far past knowledge, fact, and reason he pretty much talks to himself.
Just my opinion.

Det Columbo wrote:

But yet You are still here and commenting on My posts......So ummmmmm
Let's Me think for a second......Your bad.!
John
<quoted text>

Its a good mental excercise to be able to read someone's post and see the imediate failure in logic or ability to make a point. The more I read your posts the better I become at it. I'm by no means telling you to stop posting. The more you write the better it is for us. Diagnosing a bad argument, or quickly showing a premise to be BS will only help your future problem solving abilities.

ATTENTION......MAYBE JAMES IS THE ONE WHO WAS AT THAT MASTURBATION SITE. JMHO

http://catchingsalinger.wordpress.com/2009/07...

Save some time and go to 8 min 22 sec and watch this. There is NO PORN involved. But the commentary tells all.

He forgets what He has posted online for THE WORLD TO SEE.

Thank You James.....

John Smith

Man From Primrose Lane:

"And don't fcking beat off to my Facebook pictures when you get home," said Katy.

Tanner [his son] was asleep by the time he got home. He paid Michelle [the babysitter] and walked her to the door. Then he slipped back to his office, closed and locked the door, and did indeed spend the next twenty minutes jerking off to the Facebook pictures of his latest subject. When he was done, he felt spent and weird. But not guilty. Not even a little bit.

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Its a good mental excercise to be able to read someone's post and see the imediate failure in logic or ability to make a point. The more I read your posts the better I become at it. I'm by no means telling you to stop posting. The more you write the better it is for us. Diagnosing a bad argument, or quickly showing a premise to be BS will only help your future problem solving abilities.

and the challenge has been greatest over the years with one word "clues" and bizarre capitalization. quality stuff, right?! lol

Jean....

Block him now....while ya got ya chance. JMHO

Jean Druse wrote:

Man From Primrose Lane:
"And don't fcking beat off to my Facebook pictures when you get home," said Katy.
Tanner [his son] was asleep by the time he got home. He paid Michelle [the babysitter] and walked her to the door. Then he slipped back to his office, closed and locked the door, and did indeed spend the next twenty minutes jerking off to the Facebook pictures of his latest subject. When he was done, he felt spent and weird. But not guilty. Not even a little bit.

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
It goes like this. If you tell yourself a lie over and over again you drift farther and farther away from the truth. The new axiom that Det Columbo uses is so far past knowledge, fact, and reason he pretty much talks to himself.
Just my opinion.

so politely stated….
i've known a few "compulsive" liars….just a few. intriguing. it must come from childhood trauma.

Renner uses combo of NSA and Gay Mafia tactics to stifle free speech on his Maura Murray conspiracy blog.

https://www.youtube.com/watch...

Like a fish out of water.......James who.?

Priceless...worth the watch.

John Smith

NOT (john Healy) just to make things clear..

Welcome aborde mayete

so renner, is it you?

you're on my ship now

Greetings and salutations, everyone.

Missed you!(Well, most of you.)

Detective Columbo, I could be incorrect, and I'm going off memory here - but didn't you claim to have a PI license? That your purportedly kept in good standing and were willing, if I recall correctly, to post/photo/etc to verify your credentials?

Further, didn't you claim on various pages in this forum to be a private investigator, although admittedly perhaps not John Healy?

If I am wrong, I'll apologize in all sincerity. But if my memory serves, you did claim to be a private investigator, and you attempted to engage Beagle on the forum in your role as a PI...

SimplyCaustic, AKA Mindy

ViKing wrote:

<quoted text>
https://www.youtube.com/watch...

wow likes this.

Hi Mindy....

Yes I did claim that and it was true.

I am not John Healy and never claimed to be him.

My credentials were shown at one time and there is/was a link on topix to that information.
Not sure If it is still out there but I did post it at one time because of the pressure by the posters on this forum.

Hope this helps.

Det. Columbo....John Smith

Simply Caustic wrote:

Greetings and salutations, everyone.
Missed you!(Well, most of you.)
Detective Columbo, I could be incorrect, and I'm going off memory here - but didn't you claim to have a PI license? That your purportedly kept in good standing and were willing, if I recall correctly, to post/photo/etc to verify your credentials?
Further, didn't you claim on various pages in this forum to be a private investigator, although admittedly perhaps not John Healy?
If I am wrong, I'll apologize in all sincerity. But if my memory serves, you did claim to be a private investigator, and you attempted to engage Beagle on the forum in your role as a PI...
SimplyCaustic, AKA Mindy

Red October wrote:

you're on my ship now

>> tHr33 d@y t0ur <<

Renner, IS THIS YOU? I dare you to say something nice about Maura.

Det Columbo wrote:

Hi Mindy....
Yes I did claim that and it was true.
I am not John Healy and never claimed to be him.
My credentials were shown at one time and there is/was a link on topix to that information.
Not sure If it is still out there but I did post it at one time because of the pressure by the posters on this forum.
Hope this helps.
Det. Columbo....John Smith
<quoted text>

Thanks for your response.

I'm unsure where/why/how I had associated Columbo with Healy, but I surely did. I recall the PI verification, I think it was last year.

am I the only one that thought you were Healy? DIdn't Snowy, WTF, or Beagle? Or was I completely and woefully uninformed this whole time?

I'm off to read the downloads of the prior forum thread to see where I got this idea into my head. Must've been suggested by someone, somewhere.

---

On another note, I think I'm the last one that still supports Renner. I will note this: I'm a fan of the way he "strikes out" information that has been proven incorrect, in lieu of merely updating the blog and removing the erroneous information. That's the way the papers used to do it (corrections/updates) and I just find it to be proper. That's just me.