Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:

NO...Sorry that is not what I meant at all. Was relating to all Renner's references to Manchester is all.
My apologies Please.
John Smith
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
Apology accepted. As all of Renner's comments regarding Manchester apply to me/Ridiculous/Leslie/whoever else he thinks we all are, I'm sure you can understand how your post appeared to be joining in with that.
On another note, Columbo, why haven't you addressed Renner's accusation that you and Beagle are "tight" on Facebook? From what I have observed, over a long period of time, I believe that is simply not true. I could be mistaken. I hope that you will address this issue.

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
Apology accepted. As all of Renner's comments regarding Manchester apply to me/Ridiculous/Leslie/whoever else he thinks we all are, I'm sure you can understand how your post appeared to be joining in with that.
On another note, Columbo, why haven't you addressed Renner's accusation that you and Beagle are "tight" on Facebook? From what I have observed, over a long period of time, I believe that is simply not true. I could be mistaken. I hope that you will address this issue.

Beagle wrote:

Not going anywhere because LaWall does not scare me. Even though she is, in fact, scarier than Joe A.

Not Without Apparel wrote:

<quoted text>
Can I buy you a drink?

Judged:

1

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:

There is nothing to address on this matter. Beagle and are definitely not tight in any way.
Just another of James games.!
John Smith
<quoted text>

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>
Can't speak for DC, but we are not tight - that is, friendly - in any sense of the word.

Not Without Apparel wrote:

<quoted text>
Can I buy you a drink?

Beagle wrote:

Vincent Paolone has yet to vouch for Lance Reenstierna and Lucky Quarter Productions. Wonder why?

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>
Why?

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Beagle, if you wouldn't mind, would you post that statement from your Alden Olson registered account? It's become a tad difficult to know when it is you posting.
Thank you for answering this. I was pretty sure when Renner stated this, that it simply wasn't true. As I said, I have been observing things for quite a while, and only once saw interaction between you two on Facebook, on Columbo's friend's public restaurant page, and that was recent. When two people "like" a public Facebook page and both comment on it, it doesn't make them "tight." In fact, I think it's likely that Beagle "likes" that page because of Columbo. The interaction that I saw happened just once, and consisted of one comment by each person:
"Beagle: Go [name of restaurant]!!!"
Directly following:
"Columbo: I think [Beagle] likes [name of restaurant]."
That's it. You are/were not Facebook friends, and I never saw you interact on the Maura Murray Facebook page (and I have read every post there for a couple of years now).
Yet this is what Renner posted:
"Over on Facebook,[Columbo] and [Beagle] are pretty tight.[Beagle], you may recall, was the creep who taunted Maura's family on the anniversary of her disappearance.[Beagle] also posted a video on YouTube that showed pictures of my four year old son playing in my front yard."
Here again, we have a case of Renner posting complete bullshit in order to harm others and to incite his sheeple followers. And, the thing is, it works!! They don't think, they just go, "yes, Renner said it, it must be true" and then grab their torches and hunt people down. This is not just a lack of journalistic ethics on Renner's part, it is a complete lack of any type of human morality.
Renner has absolutely NO credibility, and he proves it again and again. Yet there are people out there (and on this forum apparently) that either ignore it or turn a blind eye to it. Willful ignorance and/or simple stupidity seems to go hand in hand with Renner's followers, it is really amazing to me and will make a great article some day for somebody to write.