Maura Murray

Judged:

2

2

2

Maruchan wrote:

So many here seem to be almost gleefully taking this opportunity to attack Columbo, and therefore turning the conversation away from where it should be, on Renner's continued actions to hunt down, defame, and reveal personal information about anybody that criticizes him. Some of you actually defend Renner's tactics, on the grounds that Columbo deserves it, in your eyes.
I wonder how you would feel if it was your good name, your face, your employer, your friends, that were attacked in the same way? All because you expressed criticism and anger at what you perceived to be unwarranted attacks against people you knew or even complete strangers? And when you tried to voice those opinions, you were defamed and silenced?
But wait ... that's what happened to many of you on the old MMM forum, right? You've been here and on other forums talking about it for years - not being able to state your opinion if it went against the "Murray family line," and being banned for stating that opinion. That anger is still right here today, that anger at being silenced.
But when Columbo does the same thing, it is not only OK for his voice to be silenced at Renner's blog, it is OK for Renner to publish not only his personal information, but to try to make Columbo look like a pervert and drag in yet another innocent party completely unconnected to anything in this case and defame them as well. It's not only OK, it is right and just. It is not only right and just, it is a time to shout, "ha, ha, Columbo, see what you get for stating your opinions, karma baby, karma."
I am glad that some can see beyond their grudges against Columbo, who, although they have no love lost for him, still stand up for what is ACTUALLY right and just. They are able to stand back and address the real, important issue of a "journalist" who will stop at nothing to RETALIATE against anybody who criticizes him, who will BLACKMAIL somebody by saying if you don't play nice, I will continue to bring harm to those innocents who you have some connection with until you shut your mouth. I will post photographs of totally unrelated innocent people that I believe are you, until I recognize my error, then, without admitting that error, without issuing an *Update* to announce that error, I will quietly switch out the photograph of the innocent party to put in a photograph of the actual person that is pissing me off. I will make up relationships that don't exist to make you look worse.
The enormous difference between anything Columbo has done or said and what Renner does is the degree of INFLUENCE each has in the world. Not to add to his already huge ego, Renner is now one of the people who is always interviewed about Maura Murray. That public exposure gives him a large audience, and the things he says, true or not, will reach many people. Without condoning anything Columbo may have done in the past, his opinions were confined to a few forums - his reach was small. There is no comparison at all to the harm Columbo may have caused and the harm Renner is capable of causing.
<quoted text>
When? Once? Twice? The number of Renner's non-retractions dwarfs any feeble attempt he has made in a couple of instances to "retract" his "unfortunate, careless." false, mean, cruel, false, vindictive, petty, manipulative, false, obsessive, paranoid, false "statements and accusations."
Again, thanks to those who kept their eye on the ball.
Spell-check may now begin.

Judged:

3

3

3

SnowyB wrote:

poor Columbo is confused. all his mommies tell him he's a good boy, and so he doesn't get that he's an insidious pot-stirrer.
this chapter of sub- plots and high drama should be set to wane with the full moon.
troll(s ) will re-enter the stage, and the cheap-seaters, newly reorganized, will set out a bowl of popcorn for the knight of topix. clap clap. clap clap. clap.
curtain falls.

Judged:

1

Det Columbo wrote:

http://www.topix.com/forum/cit y/charleston-sc/THI1NIACCHLQRO T4M#lastPost
Found this forum....Charlestown SC forum but all posters from OK. AFB in Altus is where John Lapinski was stationed.
Altus is next to Lawton OK. Billy Rausch was stationed in Lawton OK.
John Lapinski is related to Peobert Patzelt who was arrested march 26th 2014 at his home in Mountain lakes Haverhill NH on a charge of SEXUAL ASSAULT 12 YR OLD GIRL. Patzelt is from NJ.
http://www.nj.com/bergen/index.ssf/2014/03/ne...
Just thinking

Judged:

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Cecil Smith arrested someone in Mountain lakes for a sexual assault charge on his step daughter. Does anyone recall this? It was maybe 1-2 years after Maura went missing.

Judged:

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:

Goose lane holds the clues. JMHO

Judged:

1

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:

Hello there...
I do remember this. Not sure if there is a connection or not.
John
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Not sure there is, however some might agree with your first ever MMM post.
Why wouldn't the ex-chief talk to Renner?

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
Not sure there is, however some might agree with your first ever MMM post.
Why wouldn't the ex-chief talk to Renner?

Judged:

1

Det Columbo wrote:

As in Williams..?
Because He was and is involved in some pretty shady things.! JMHO
Which post are You referring to by Me..?
Thanx....John
<quoted text>

Judged:

2

2

2

Det Columbo wrote:

I see that Renner likes to remove Your posts from His blog as well. You must have had a different OPINION THAN HIS.
He loves playing the game.
John
<quoted text>

Judged:

1

1

1

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
you've just made my point.
you continue to instigate.

Judged:

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
North Country ebay.
Although trunk style not online.

Judged:

1

1

1

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
you've just made my point.
you continue to instigate.

Judged:

1

1

1

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
you've just made my point.
you continue to instigate.