Maura Murray

Judged:

2

2

2

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Actually, I am being too kind here. People that don't have the ability to examine a mildly complex subject in any depth and resort to catch phrases should be ignored completely because clearly they have nothing intellectually to offer. Listen to people like that at your peril.
Oh, and people who sputter out sentence fragments that are unfinished thoughts (if there was any thought there to begin with) marked by ..... and use pffft to try to get some unseen point across should be particularly suspect. I base this on first hand knowledge having seen those sentence constructs and knowing where they originated and the quality of the "thoughts".
Bill

Judged:

3

3

2

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
If maitland went missing and they never found out the POI in that case how could that happen.

Judged:

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
IMO, the only way LE can make a definitive statement that there was no Murray/Maitland connection is that LE must have some evidence thats points to someone, and that someone may be accounted for on March 19th the day Brianna went missing.
Jail records would be one way to determine conclusively someones whereabouts.
Just a theory though.

Judged:

2

1

1

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Did maura have any friends in jail that maybe they spoke to?

Judged:

3

2

1

jwb wrote:

2009 threadfrom another forum to follow. I thought that he used ether was interesting. We discussed that possiblity not long ago on this forum.
Rooney is believed to have used ether(as in starter fluid)-soaked cloths to subdue his victims. 6) Rooney is now in prison, not in Vermont, appealing his conviction. Are there any compelling reasons to think that it's not possible that Rooney was involved in Maura's disappearance?

Judged:

3

2

1

Det Columbo wrote:

Is Brian Rooney in the Sullivan County jail system.
John

Simply caustic wrote:

<quoted text>
Whoa, Beagle, you lost me here. I don't profess to know Massachusetts law backwards and forwards, but I know that the Grand Jury is NOT in front of a judge. It's 23 jurors. They do, in fact, need to have a suspect - who else would be the focus of the Grand Jury? The sole purpose of a Grand Jury is to determine whether or not to issue a criminal indictment, they utilize the probable cause standard....if they indict, Their decision is a true bill. If no indictment, no true bill. That's it,

Judged:

5

5

4

looking4amoose wrote:

http://content.yudu.com/Librar y/A1vhuy/NCN20312/resources/in dex.htm?referrerUrl=