Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

Yikes yikes yikes wrote:

Looks like Beagle's the new belle of the ball...
http://mauramurray.blogspot.com/2012/02/is-th...

Judged:

1

1

1

Laurieisgone wrote:

WTH- do you ever think anyone is guilty of anything? just wondering. Perhaps he's not, of course that's a possibility, perhaps he is, what do you know really what the truth is. You don't have inside information so what would it hurt to investigate this further. Maybe that's where she was heading? I think it would be a good use of time to try to find out what hotels or motels around Bretton Woods had a reservation and the person didn't show. A reservation for the exact date she disappeared and the person didn't show up. I would think a motel or hotel would then charge the credit card associated to the account because of a no-show. Energy could best be used in this case to be HELPFUL instead of being hurtful. I'm just saying.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
the youtube caption was "Happy Anniversary". i didn't note the date....but it may not be Maura-related at all....except as general entertainment.

Judged:

3

2

2

Yikes yikes yikes wrote:

Looks like Beagle's the new belle of the ball...
http://mauramurray.blogspot.com/2012/02/is-th...

Judged:

2

2

1

Laurieisgone wrote:

WTH- do you ever think anyone is guilty of anything? just wondering. Perhaps he's not, of course that's a possibility, perhaps he is, what do you know really what the truth is. You don't have inside information so what would it hurt to investigate this further. Maybe that's where she was heading? I think it would be a good use of time to try to find out what hotels or motels around Bretton Woods had a reservation and the person didn't show. A reservation for the exact date she disappeared and the person didn't show up. I would think a motel or hotel would then charge the credit card associated to the account because of a no-show. Energy could best be used in this case to be HELPFUL instead of being hurtful. I'm just saying.

Judged:

1

1

1

Laurieisgone wrote:

Energy could best be used in this case to be HELPFUL

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
So, should we be getting IP addresses for you also? Being that you seem angry, even agitated, and have injected yourself into the Maura investigation??? I mean, he was laughing and injected himself into the Maura investigation so we should track him down, correct? Truthfully, you creep me out more than he did.
Yaaawwwwwn.
Bill

Judged:

2

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, Renner is showing what a scumbag he is. Does he have any proof that Beagle is the creep? Yet he is flashing his picture around and associating him with it. That is all the evidence you have. What a piece of s**t.
Everyone knows that I am not a Beagle fan, but again, this is wrong and the same thing that Shack did. Guilt by being close by. Throw s**t on the wall and see if it sticks.
What an a**hole. Great journalism.
Bill

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Again, Renner is showing what a scumbag he is. Does he have any proof that Beagle is the creep? Yet he is flashing his picture around and associating him with it. That is all the evidence you have. What a piece of s**t.
Everyone knows that I am not a Beagle fan, but again, this is wrong and the same thing that Shack did. Guilt by being close by. Throw s**t on the wall and see if it sticks.
What an a**hole. Great journalism.
Bill

Kitten wrote:

<quoted text>
But, again, it's his right to post and say what he likes. It's not a crime unless he outright accuses Beagle of something sinister, which he hasn't done. Then it's libel. Right now, it's just asking if we think they look alike.

Judged:

2

2

1

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
What happened to you? You used to be semi interesting but you've turned into Donnie Downer of late. it's okay, IMS is a treatable condition.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
good morning.
this has really escalated to poor entertainment!
these people take themselves way too seriously.
and the one that uses the term "actual"....has given herself away.
so many hours, so many monikers to decode.
enjoy your day, WTH/Bill....and Wowzer, too.

Kitten wrote:

<quoted text>
You're right again, no proof. But, again, it's his right to post and say what he likes. It's not a crime unless he outright accuses Beagle of something sinister, which he hasn't done. Then it's libel. Right now, it's just asking if we think they look alike.
And they do. Which also doesn't prove a darn thing.

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Not arguing with you but let me say this.
What if he put your picture up to compare it to a known murderers picture. Would you consider that ethical, moral, good journalism?
Bill

Judged:

2

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
And it's not IMS its IBS. Wish you were here.
Bill

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I often see you post quite clueless posts. If you really think this idiot was involved with Maura's disappearance, have at it. Start your sleuthing or whatever you do. Odd way to head to Brenton Woods in my opinion. So a $16 lift ticket two days after her disappearance says investigation to you? And about the whining, please stop the whining. I see you are one of the people that think these sites are for "investigation". Well good for you. If you could point to one case that was furthered, not solved but just furthered along because of one of these forums, I'd be impressed.
Helpful, be serious. Oh, I'm sorry, you were being serious.
No need to be "helpful". This case will be solved when Maura shows up. Not before.
Again, no inside information, just an abundance of common sense and logic.
So, should we be getting IP addresses for you also? Being that you seem angry, even agitated, and have injected yourself into the Maura investigation??? I mean, he was laughing and injected himself into the Maura investigation so we should track him down, correct? Truthfully, you creep me out more than he did.
Yaaawwwwwn.
Bill

Judged:

2

2

2

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Not arguing with you but let me say this.
What if he put your picture up to compare it to a known murderers picture. Would you consider that ethical, moral, good journalism?
Bill

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
where do you get $16 lift ticket? It is a package ticket and that generally includes accommodation.Where does it say $16 lift ticket?

Judged:

2

2

Kitten wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope. It's not ethical or good journalism, we agree there. It's just not a crime.

Kitten wrote:

<quoted text>
On the far left edge, it's cut off a bit. I thought it said $12.00, but it could say $16.00, it's not very clear.