Maura Murray

Muttley wrote:

<quoted text>
Jesus, chill out man. This entire story had been interesting and engaging to read about until the last week or so when you decided to continuously throw everyone under the bus and rave about "common sense", "stupidity", the like there of.
Quite frankly, it gets old. Sorry to say, you're not any better than anybody else. Get over yourself.
So people bring up the same questions... Who f**king cares? Let them. Is it really that big of a deal?

Amen

Muttley wrote:

<quoted text>
Jesus, chill out man. This entire story had been interesting and engaging to read about until the last week or so when you decided to continuously throw everyone under the bus and rave about "common sense", "stupidity", the like there of.
Quite frankly, it gets old. Sorry to say, you're not any better than anybody else. Get over yourself.
So people bring up the same questions... Who f**king cares? Let them. Is it really that big of a deal?

In case you haven't noticed, Bill's a one-trick pony.

Muttley wrote:

<quoted text>
Jesus, chill out man. This entire story had been interesting and engaging to read about until the last week or so when you decided to continuously throw everyone under the bus and rave about "common sense", "stupidity", the like there of.
Quite frankly, it gets old. Sorry to say, you're not any better than anybody else. Get over yourself.
So people bring up the same questions... Who f**king cares? Let them. Is it really that big of a deal?

I actually found that post a good response. WTH as a poster sometimes may come off a little rough around the edges, but his post was thought provoking.

Again I understand that sometimes he is rough, but I don't understand when you guys attack him for using knowledge or "common sense"

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
I actually found that post a good response. WTH as a poster sometimes may come off a little rough around the edges, but his post was thought provoking.
Again I understand that sometimes he is rough, but I don't understand when you guys attack him for using knowledge or "common sense"

WT?. Are you Snowy and Bill's long-lost cyber love-child?

Muttley wrote:

<quoted text>
Jesus, chill out man. This entire story had been interesting and engaging to read about until the last week or so when you decided to continuously throw everyone under the bus and rave about "common sense", "stupidity", the like there of.
Quite frankly, it gets old. Sorry to say, you're not any better than anybody else. Get over yourself.
So people bring up the same questions... Who f**king cares? Let them. Is it really that big of a deal?

Yep. For reasons explained much earlier.

Bill

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
In case you haven't noticed, Bill's a one-trick pony.

Yeah, that's me. In case all the rest haven't noticed. Since these others have arrived. The Brain Trust. They have been making astounding progress in this case. Oh. Wait a minute. Everything is exactly the same as it was eight years ago. But, lots more wind.

Never-mind.

Bill

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>Again I understand that sometimes he is rough, but I don't understand when you guys attack him for using knowledge or "common sense"

Simple. Its not their realm.

Bill

Yes, perfectly said 'A one trick pony'. And Bill you complain about mostly everyone here (except maybe Tom and Kitten) and you say exactly the same thing over and over again. Talk about old news! By the way I was on the old boards way back when, I have seen all of the theories about what happened to Maura, I used to read with interest what Weeper used to say. What ever happened to him? He just sort of disappeared. So what if we throw out some ideas here and there, that's what this place is here for isn't it? I like to read what people think might have happened, I think that mostly there are some thoughtful kind helpful posters here.

Amy wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree that posting peoples' identities is in poor taste and uncalled for. Especially unsubstantiated third-party info. Lacks journalistic integrity and common decency.
The "Beagle" accusations are even worse IMHO. Pass the vids on to authorities if there are concerns, but risking contributing to an attack against a possibly innocent man is never cool in my book.
I am grateful that Renner has come at this thing with fresh eyes and that he engaged in his fact-finding mission via FOIA requests etc, but some of his posts are disappointing from an ethical standpoint.
Hoping something new will come along soon so we can all move along.

Excellent post. And I agree completely.

Bill

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
Just won $20 that you'd show up after our last post!

Excellent. Maybe you can use it to buy yourself a clue. Want to answer any of the questions?

Bill

Laurieisgone wrote:

Yes, perfectly said 'A one trick pony'. And Bill you complain about mostly everyone here (except maybe Tom and Kitten) and you say exactly the same thing over and over again. Talk about old news! By the way I was on the old boards way back when, I have seen all of the theories about what happened to Maura, I used to read with interest what Weeper used to say. What ever happened to him? He just sort of disappeared. So what if we throw out some ideas here and there, that's what this place is here for isn't it? I like to read what people think might have happened, I think that mostly there are some thoughtful kind helpful posters here.

I wonder. Would that be because of the quality of their posts or maybe I just like their names?

Now to other business or actually delayed business. Anyone want to answer the questions? Or is that work too hard. Or is you and your friends rank speculation just too easy? Bueller, anyone?

Cmon, take a stab at it.---> "lured, abducted and murdered" Really? So she was dumb enough to be lured, like a fish? But you said she was well educated??? And abduction, you have some proof, anything? Talented?? Did she play the trombone or something, never heard that. Murdered??? Oh No!!! You know something none of the others of us know? Some snippet of evidence that you would like to share?

You people made the accusation. Back it up with facts. Or are you all just full of crap? Can't tie facts together in a cohesive way? Try. I'm sure we will all get a chuckle from your first attempt at logical thought.

Bill

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Excellent. Maybe you can use it to buy yourself a clue. Want to answer any of the questions?
Bill

For everybody here (Topix Fran, NH) the question is: Why, when the evidence points to an abduction, do you ,"Bill", continuously and totally unsubstantiated proclaim that she (MM) ran off into the woods? You say that you're a "first responder" so please provide us with a plausible explanation.

The media from Beantown is linked in here so this is your chance to have your 15 minutes of fame (or infamy).

Actually, Bill, since you're the self-proclaimed expert, why don't you enlighten us. Rather than being destructive and criticizing everyone, maybe you could share some of that wisdom with the rest of us and give us your thoughts.

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
For everybody here (Topix Fran, NH) the question is: Why, when the evidence points to an abduction, do you ,"Bill", continuously and totally unsubstantiated proclaim that she (MM) ran off into the woods? You say that you're a "first responder" so please provide us with a plausible explanation.
The media from Beantown is linked in here so this is your chance to have your 15 minutes of fame (or infamy).

Is this the question game? Are we answering questions with questions?

Muttley wrote:

Actually, Bill, since you're the self-proclaimed expert, why don't you enlighten us. Rather than being destructive and criticizing everyone, maybe you could share some of that wisdom with the rest of us and give us your thoughts.

Another question?

Thanx JWB for the edit. Good call.

Tom wrote:

<quoted text>
Another question?

Correct. Another question. They have no evidence of abduction, murder so they play this game. It is common knowledge, and has been repeated over the years by at least five first responders that it is typical behavior from people that are drunk, to run from car wrecks. And I don't claim to be an expert but again, I have over ten years as a first responder and I can't count the number of times I have seen this. They want to play these games making believe that they know something that others don't. And it is just as important for them to try to make people who have been to crashes, who have helped the injured, to minimize their experiences or what they know amounts to nothing. They cannot pull together a logical, cohesive thought to post so the only option is to make believe that Maura's case has never been seen by anyone else on the planet. That is is somehow unique in the annals of history. Because if it is something that others in the rescue business have seen. Then maybe this isn't an abduction. Maybe its not a murder. Of course, that would explain a lot of the evidence. No blood, no sign of any type of struggle. No one heard any type of altercation. Nothing has shown up to indicate that her credit cards, maybe her jewelry, or anything else of hers has shown up.

They will keep dodging and weaving as much as they can because the evidence has nothing to support their theory. They will also try to use negative logic. Meaning the next step is to try to make us prove that an abduction didn't occur. Something that can't be proved. But in that same light I also can't prove aliens didn't abduct her, so you can see how useful negative logic is in this case.

I can wait. I will keep bringing this up. I have time. Lets see what they come up with.

Bill

BILL aka "WTH-the-original" and "WTF",

For everybody here (Topix Fran, NH) the question is: Why, when the evidence points to an abduction, do you ,"Bill", continuously and totally unsubstantiated proclaim that she (MM) ran off into the woods? You say that you're a "first responder" so please provide us with a plausible explanation.

The media from Beantown is linked in here so this is your chance to have your 15 minutes of fame (or infamy).

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
"lured, abducted and murdered" Really? So she was dumb enough to be lured, like a fish? But you said she was well educated??? And abduction, you have some proof, anything? Talented?? Did she play the trombone or something, never heard that. Murdered??? Oh No!!! You know something none of the others of us know? Some snippet of evidence that you would like to share?
Can't you just feel the breeze? Love the circles that this keeps going in.
Bill

Are you saying that all victims that are lured by perps are Stupid and un educated? Is that what you are saying here Bill?

As usual, Bill talks about "dodging and weaving" when, in reality he is dodging and weaving every question that is asked of him.

Rather than posting something CONstructive, he would like to be DEstructive.

by the way, Bill... who is "they"? Tell who this "they" person is you speak of. Give us names, oh thoughtful one. Share with us your almight intelligence.

We are not worthy... we are not worthy...