Maura Murray

Judged:

3

3

2

whitenoise wrote:

<quoted text>
so u r paris! u r also linda and just me. Thank u for recommending to me "bottle rocket". About 100 yrs ago. The film maura watched over and over again, her favourite film in the whole world, according to her friends. Yes, it does reveal an interest in running away and starting over. We actually enjoyed this film, not great, but sort of cute.

Judged:

3

3

3

Just me__Paris--- wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe this guy just knows who and wanted to scare that certain someone with having the ski lift ticket.
Shouldn't be too hard to go back to the place and see who took lift 13. As for this man laughing, he starts out trying to, then makes it seem pretty realistic as the music progresses. Then he stops. Looks. Winks. Smiles and puts his face into a normal grin. I think it most definately was a taunt, but to someone else. Maybe this guy thoght he'd "scare" somebody out there with it. Or spook them, to say the least.
If not some form of LE, I'll bet the laughing man wishes he could have taken the video down sooner.
I also think it could be a stunt....for publicity. And funny that it was posted the DAY before as though the joke is on us. That Maura went captive or missing or just plain AWOL, on SUNDAY with someone elses help. Just thinking out loud, and still don't think it's beagle at all.
I too think that it's not right to post where an innocent man works with no just cause. I mean after all, no where did it say 'hi, I'm Beagle and crazy and looky here, I think it's all funny, bet you wonder if I did it too.....

Judged:

2

1

1

vanderhoven wrote:

<quoted text>
Snowy, I did miss it. Can you please explain the whole Mason thing. I've asked like three people to clarify, and nobody has gotten back to me. If anyone is reluctant to re-hash whatever it is, would I be able to figure out what's being referred to by reading back-archived posts? If you could save me the trouble, at least this time, I'd appreciate it.

Judged:

2

1

1

vanderhoven wrote:

<quoted text>
Thank you so much for posting the re-cap. I am still in the midst of reading through the older posts in the thread, and there's a lot of material there so I apologize in advance if I miss something or if I ask for a reference to something. And, feel free to tell me if my asking for a re-cap or whatever new member behaviours I may have become a nuisance. Obviously I'm pretty vocal myself, and generally thick-skinned, and I'd hate to put anyone out. So I'll try to rely on my own abilities to read the back-logs as a rule, but might have to ask for info in the meantime.
Yeah, I think that whatever their reasoning MM's family has done a real disservice to their cause by leaving out as much as they did. I can understand the reasoning behind doing so, but I think in leaving things out and as you've said, by trying to portray her as the all-american girl has only strengthened people's convictions that she merely ran away, or was somehow responsible for her own disappearance. I agree with Acid House though, in thinking that the difficulties she had do not exclude her and could have made her more vulnerable. Not that they did, merely that they could have. I wonder if her family had just come out and been straight-forward about her history how much of a difference that would have made in terms of having accurate information with which to use to locate her, and in keeping members of the public from becoming frustrated or disillusioned and disinterest with the case. Would you say that many people are no longer as intent on finding her, or have less compassion, or would be less likely to come forward if they knew anything because of the family's missteps?
I ask because you've been here for a while, and I'm certain you have more insight into how the general public feels about this case than I do at this time.
Again, a big thank you for going over that old information for me! I really appreciate it.

Just me__Paris--- wrote:

Last though here, and others have said as much too. WHY would the family tell the tv viewers to just ignore this? Would it give something away? Was it a message of sorts to someone in the know, namely family?
If it were my family, I'd think...let 'er rip, this will make people think about Maura and we have been praying for this. More interest and so on.

Judged:

1

1

1

whitenoise wrote:

<quoted text>
so u r paris! u r also linda and just me. Thank u for recommending to me "bottle rocket". About 100 yrs ago. The film maura watched over and over again, her favourite film in the whole world, according to her friends. Yes, it does reveal an interest in running away and starting over. We actually enjoyed this film, not great, but sort of cute.

Det Columbo wrote:

<quoted text>
Will the real PARIS Please stand up. Hows the weather in Pa. Paris.
John

Judged:

1

vanderhoven wrote:

<quoted text>
Gah, I just lost the post I'd typed up in response to this so I apologize if this one makes less sense, but alas I'm rushing now.
I'm sorry, I hope that my post did not come across as rude. I know you've spent a lot of time here today, especially to talk to me and clarify a number of things for me and I really appreciate that.
I wasn't trying to particularly single you out. It's just something that I have noticed generally speaking, and not about you, that many people that discuss or follow the MM case are protective of Mr. Renner to a degree that I do not understand.
I'm obviously not trying to just bash him, I simply take issue with some of his methods and I find it weird that a number of people do not. I did, however, interpret, or perhaps misinterpret, your post as being in defense of his methods, and I felt as though you were essentially saying: It would be hard for him to exclusively provide verifiable information and you're not in a position to ask him to do so. Which, I took issue with. Anyways, just want to clarify I meant absolutely nothing personal by it, and that a number of my statements in that post were just commenting on how many people in general seem to respond to Renner's info. Not you, specifically. I can understand how the two were conflated in my post. My apologies.
I'd like to add, I have the vantage point of a new member, and I am new both to this site, the discussion, and Mr.Renner's site. So, yes, if Renner's posts have been especially dubious of late, and they weren't before it's a given we'll have conflicting opinions here.
(Re: Party Lines... I find it really weird that they are so tightly drawn especially when there is so little information publicly available, I personally think as you stated, all that is guaranteed is that she disappeared, should, at least in theory, make it pretty hard for party lines to be drawn. But then loyalties are a funny thing.)
Well Snowy, I'm not sure if you're headed off or not. I probably am, but who knows. If you are, my absolute best wishes and I really appreciate the discussion, and your efforts to help better inform me! A sincere thanks, and I hope you successfully manage to complete the tasks which need your attention- furthermore that you're able to do so quickly enough so that you have a little bit of time to do something especially leisurely tonight, if for nothing else you deserve it for reading through paragraphs and paragraphs of foruming. I look forward to speaking with you soon.

Judged:

3

3

2

Just me__Paris--- wrote:

<quoted text>Mason wanted to see Fred's cellphone records and be sure where Fred was between Sunday and Tuesday. He had a theory that Maura was killed by a furious father and called much of what family reps claimed to be red herrings. He explained why. Advocates forum, no time now to get it.

Judged:

1

Just me__Paris--- wrote:

<quoted text>Mason wanted to see Fred's cellphone records and be sure where Fred was between Sunday and Tuesday. He had a theory that Maura was killed by a furious father and called much of what family reps claimed to be red herrings. He explained why. Advocates forum, no time now to get it.

Judged:

1

1

1

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Is advocates forum still available for reading?Is that the actual name of the forum?

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
The forum Link I posted was not advocates forum? I thought it was but maybe not the one you are looking for.

Judged:

4

3

3

Looking4AMoose wrote:

<quoted text>Citi, earlier this week you did state that you saw the bloody/rusty knife. I'd consider that inside knowledge.

Judged:

2

1

1

Det Columbo wrote:

Why is it so quiet here.???

Judged:

6

6

5

Just me__Paris--- wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, and by that time, the time of the man giving the knife over to Fred, NOBODY should have touched it or even looked at it. If it were me, I'd have mailed it in,(if that's what police said to do) without a minute to spare. Maybe snap a picture of it, but that's about it.

Judged:

4

4

4

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>yes I said I saw the knife.And I also said it was a small knife in plastic. I never said I saw a bloody/rusty knife.

Judged:

3

2

2

Det Columbo wrote:

Why is it so quiet here.???