Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
He can defend his posts if he wants.He is blaming me for putting stuff out about Beagle (in Beagles own words not mine) yet he calls Fred a sexual molester of his missing daughter and he says so without any facts what so ever. I guess you are saying that you condone the posts.

vanderhoven wrote:

<quoted text>
I would think that the principle issue with the knife would be chain of custody, not so much evidence tampering. While I'm sure the person who gave it to FM was just trying to be helpful, and that FM was trying to salvage whatever value was left in this piece of evidence, I don't think after having such an unorthodox chain of custody that this piece of evidence would have any use whatsoever at this point. Perhaps it could lead them in the direction of the perpetrator if in fact it was ever connected, but apart from that it's essentially useless, if I'm not mistaken.

vanderhoven wrote:

<quoted text>
JWB, I would suggest that you leave Tom out of this. If you have to explain your actions yesterday then do so, but don't drag Tom back into it. I don't know the guy, and you seem nice enough. Perhaps a little misguided at times, but considering I've only been here for a couple of days I'm in no position to judge. That said, you resolved all of this with Tom yesterday, and he apologized so I would suggest you use the past tense or at least figure out some other way to defend your actions because it doesn't especially help your case if your posts can be interpreted as attempting to prolong the feud with Tom. That said I don't think you're a bully. You were badgering him, certainly, but perhaps you just didn't know of another way to get your point across. Anyway, I'd like to point out it isn't Tom who is criticizing your actions at this point, it's Snowy and Wowzer, it would be in your favour to clearly address your rebuttals to them.

Judged:

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Dead on Vanderhoven. Mail gets misplaced all the time etc.Chain of evidence is huge. To send evidence by mail is just mind boggling to me. I would march it right down to the police station and have it logged in right in front of me.

Judged:

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Did I just reach the Magic Post Total or something? I can almost see the Balloons and confetti flying.
I just want to thank everyone here at topix for allowing me to reach
the plateau of the welcoming committee. Tom, I want to thank you for expediting my journey. To that I say salute.

Frostman wrote:

Someone's making home videos again.

Frostman wrote:

Someone's making home videos again.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
this is nuts.

Judged:

1

AcidHouseMartin wrote:

Given Beagle's propensity for untruths and wildly over dramatic claims, suggestions, hints and (veiled or otherwise) accusations, why is anyone assuming the tales in 'Passing Through Town' have any basis in fact.
Reading the blog, and observing recent events, I see Beagle more as an aspiring writer of fiction and compulsive attention seeker than anything else.
I see know reason to believe anything he says. Or to believe he believes it either.
Whatever his motivation, I'm inclined to think EVERYTHING he puts in the public domain is carefully contrived fantasy devised to illicit reactions and nothing more. I don't just mean the being questioned regarding MM but the whole 'I work at Walmart and live on the streets' thing.
Take it all with a pinch of salt. Including the stylised pathos, street smart declarations and sympathy pleas.

Judged:

2

2

2

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Acid House, I believe this is the post that evoked a response. The times match up.

vanderhoven wrote:

It's my opinion that the person who has been posting this crap has just removed any suspicion that they may be connected to the case. Which means, eventually the conversations surrounding this garbage will die down. Sooner, than it would had it just been the menacing laughter filled taunt-a-whirl, which strikes me as kind of sad, if you're attention seeking why go against your best interests by bringing up a ridiculous tangent like that? Geesh, It's just so hard to get sustained attention these days.

vanderhoven wrote:

<quoted text>
If that is the case, that's very funny. Tremendously sad, but funny too. Keep in mind it would take a couple minutes to upload, and would take what, thirty seconds for the paint drawing?

Judged:

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Just guessing as to what evoked the response. The video and his post each are approx an hour ago.The video was obviously just thrown together as saying I get the gold star so look at me. Pretty sick stuff.

jwb wrote:

did everyone click where it says "more" under the video? another message given

Judged:

2

2

1

AcidHouseMartin wrote:

<quoted text>
I can't view any of the videos on my mobile. Haven't watched any of them, in fact. Ergo, if I've unwittingly provoked a response in an attention seeker then I've done so not as a result of his own output but of other people's describing his output.
Very postmodern. Very annoying, doubtless, to the attention seeker too.
I won't be losing any sleep, though!