Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

kitten wrote:

<quoted text>
Snowy got a couple unlit bulbs and spams for this one, but she really does have a point. Yes, the past is in the past. Day to day, that much is true. That whole area got painted with a real broad bad-guy brush over this, and it isn't fair, however. One unnamed person's alleged actions (IF it even was someone local; IF anything sinister happened at all) doesn't account for the whole town.
Fell on my already broken tailbone again the other day. UNHAPPY. But I wanted to put out there that I will be requesting documents from Amherst PD regarding the 1st crash & subsequent mysteries. If they decide to release them to me, I'll find a way to share them here so all can see.

Judged:

2

1

1

Shack wrote:

<quoted text>Nothing regarding carpet.

kitten wrote:

<quoted text>
Snowy got a couple unlit bulbs and spams for this one, but she really does have a point. Yes, the past is in the past. Day to day, that much is true. That whole area got painted with a real broad bad-guy brush over this, and it isn't fair, however. One unnamed person's alleged actions (IF it even was someone local; IF anything sinister happened at all) doesn't account for the whole town.
Fell on my already broken tailbone again the other day. UNHAPPY. But I wanted to put out there that I will be requesting documents from Amherst PD regarding the 1st crash & subsequent mysteries. If they decide to release them to me, I'll find a way to share them here so all can see.

Judged:

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Respectfully,I think you are wrong Brian

Judged:

1

hannah_b wrote:

Interesting they at least admit they have determined a last place she was, which they don´t want to disclose and which apparently was not at the accident scene, since that place is already known to the public as the last place she was seen.
I believe reading between the lines tells us she somehow made it from the accident scene to some other place under NH jurisdiction, though possibly out of Grafton county.

Shack wrote:

<quoted text>The Lodge served as a base Camp for the October 2006 by the searchers with Ct. SSR who volunteered their services...within a mile from A frame. From memory Haverhill PD didn't attend...(maybe I just didn't see them/him..maybe not in uniform...?) Besides the then Chief there were only 3 other LEO's for the pop. 5K..anyway.

Judged:

1

1

1

Brilliant Brian wrote:

<quoted text>
Why? Do you know something I don't? I know of at least one source that said it, and Shack agrees. What do you think?

Emmett Dove wrote:

<quoted text>
Inadmissable in court.. easy to pass.. deodarant on finger tips & 2 shots of nyquil.. or as a former Ranger, you imagine a triangle, just keep your mind on it, & use your finger that is free to go over said triangle.. or sit on your free hand.. etc;
Or - certain medical conditions prevent them anyway.. High Blood Pressure, Severe Anxiety, Heart Conditions, Mental Conditions.. etc;

Judged:

1

1

Emmett Dove wrote:

<quoted text>
Sorry about your tailbone :( is this the doc you want regarding the first crash?
https://docs.google.com/viewer...

Judged:

2

2

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
Respectfully,I think you are wrong Brian

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you think possibly out of Grafton County?

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow,I had no idea..there was another former ranger here for a while.

Brilliant Brian wrote:

<quoted text>
Why? Do you know something I don't? I know of at least one source that said it, and Shack agrees. What do you think?

kitten wrote:

<quoted text>
Thanks, friend. And yes, that's one of the docs I was hoping for. You're good. There are also the reports regarding the CC fraud, which, unlike the crash report, should give us a little more insight into her mind at the time.
I'm still appalled that no one at UMass thought to check the library computers, or the Lederle Grad Tower computer lab computers, or the computer lab in the administration office, or any of the dozen locations she could have logged on from. In 2004, to use a University computer, you had to log in with your ID and password. Sometimes people left the computers logged on, so the only reason I can see for ignoring the other computer labs is that LE considered it a slippery slope toward outright policing of student internet access.
BUT, then. UMass was also one of the first schools in the US to allow the RIAA (recording industry association of America) to subpoena IP addresses for filesharing/downloading. I don't much think they'd just not allow a search of the public computers seeing as how they folded right away about giving away the people who used fileshare programs. This is a really clear-cut example for how LE could have done more initially.

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Beacause the investigation in later years seem to have focused out of Grafton county. No proof, just a feeling.
Btw, come to think of it, that correction facility could have been the location of an inmate giving LE some info.

Judged:

1

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Beacause the investigation in later years seem to have focused out of Grafton county. No proof, just a feeling.
Btw, come to think of it, that correction facility could have been the location of an inmate giving LE some info.

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Or they may have administered a polygraph at the correction facility.