Maura Murray

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
there is no evidence in the public view to prove she was abducted, the victim of violence. or murdered.
in any case, opinions and theories outside of the official investigation don't count.
however, her relationships, conduct, and choices/ actions would seem relevant to her running from UMASS Amherst just prior to her disappearance. why would these be discounted?
a rhetorical question...no answer required.

There is enough evidence to point towards individuals.Maybe a failed polygraph? Maybe suspicious interview (s). There might not be evidence of a murder yet but things are leaning that way based on Mrs smith's Comments.I have not disclosed who I think they might be looking at so lets not get all worked up in a lather. Maybe you should try following what is going on instead of playing your game. No one is interested in your family feud game in a forum for a Missing girl.

They now have Maura as a meth head but WE are blaming the victim. And yes, meth is remarkably dangerous as is the manufacturing of meth. Meth labs blow up all the time because of the chemicals used in the manufacturing process and the fact that many meth heads are not the sharpest tools in the shed.

Bill

Yes, I have to agree with you - I don't think it was a nice easy breezy getaway to stare at the trees and relax. She seemed to need to regroup and was certainly running away but we really don't know if she was running away or running to someone, do we? It certainly was strange to tell people about a death in the family when there was none. Telling SBD that she called police when we know she did not, strange behavior all of it. And no, there is no evidence to prove she was murdered, abducted, etc... I think people are just trying to figure it all out. The common consensus is that something bad happened to her. Do you have a theory as to what happened up there at the accident scene? Where do you think she disappeared to?

Snowy's morning routine

&#8206;"The first thing I do in the morning is brush my teeth and sharpen my tongue.”- Dorothy Parker

Consider this wrote:

Snowy's morning routine
&#8206;"The first thing I do in the morning is brush my teeth and sharpen my tongue.”- Dorothy Parker

She then puts her hand over her heart and faces the wall and addresses a pic of the weather barn.

She recites " I snowey do solmnly swear to protect the innocents through Ducks and newbies. I will spend the rest of my life trashing everyone in my path."

WTH-the-original wrote:

They now have Maura as a meth head but WE are blaming the victim. And yes, meth is remarkably dangerous as is the manufacturing of meth. Meth labs blow up all the time because of the chemicals used in the manufacturing process and the fact that many meth heads are not the sharpest tools in the shed. Bill

Thank you Doctor KnowLittle,

Not "WE" Bill, you and certain others never miss an opportunity to insinuate that Maura Murray, Brianna Maitland, Louise Chaput and other victims were dealt their respective fates as some sort of karmic retribution for their lives here on earth.

You've made many comments to that effect on this forum. I'm sure if your search skills aren't up to snuff someone will provide you the direct links.

Laurieisgone wrote:

Yes, I have to agree with you - I don't think it was a nice easy breezy getaway to stare at the trees and relax. She seemed to need to regroup and was certainly running away but we really don't know if she was running away or running to someone, do we? It certainly was strange to tell people about a death in the family when there was none. Telling SBD that she called police when we know she did not, strange behavior all of it. And no, there is no evidence to prove she was murdered, abducted, etc... I think people are just trying to figure it all out. The common consensus is that something bad happened to her. Do you have a theory as to what happened up there at the accident scene? Where do you think she disappeared to?

fact: she has disappeared.

fact: her whereabouts remain unknown.

she left (ran) under suspicious circumstances, i.e. without telling family/friends of her plans, to include lying to the nursing dept.

it is highly doubtful that the public, with so little information, can "figure it all out". it's been attempted, ad nauseum. 8 years of endless windmilling.

JRenner can feed the public curiosity with info he uncovers, but the official investigation remains in the hands of the authorities.

just a thought.....have you considered waiting, patiently?

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
glad to make you smile.
the evidence points to a distressed MM (emotional reaction to phone call), lying to excuse herself from her academic obligations, running away from campus in an unreliable car, credit card fraud, and finally going missing....more than to carefree, zen getaway.
again, which friend spoke to not wanting to "get her in trouble" after her disappearance?

If that is where the evidence points to then The NH AG would have been required to turn over more information. They had to show the judge behind closed doors that they just weren't holding info for the heck or it.

Mr. Ervin: Has [your investigation] generally focused on individuals.

Sgt. Landry: Individuals?

Mr. Ervin: Correct.

Sgt. Landry: Yes.

Mr. Ervin: Is the investigation currently ongoing as to those individuals?

Sgt. Landry: Yes.

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
Not "WE" Bill, you and certain others never miss an opportunity to insinuate that Maura Murray, Brianna Maitland, Louise Chaput and other victims were dealt their respective fates as some sort of karmic retribution for their lives here on earth.

actually, the authorities state the murray and maitland cases are unrelated.
no one is judging MM, though choices tend to beget consequences.
the matter is, assuredly, in the hands of the proper authorities.

YES....There are 2 brothers that "WERE" being looked into some time ago. It is unclear if they are still active POI in the disappearance of Maura Murray.

John

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
If that is where the evidence points to then The NH AG would have been required to turn over more information. They had to show the judge behind closed doors that they just weren't holding info for the heck or it.
Mr. Ervin: Has [your investigation] generally focused on individuals.
Sgt. Landry: Individuals?
Mr. Ervin: Correct.
Sgt. Landry: Yes.
Mr. Ervin: Is the investigation currently ongoing as to those individuals?
Sgt. Landry: Yes.

the point you are trying to make relative to my reply escapes me.

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
There is enough evidence to point towards individuals.Maybe a failed polygraph? Maybe suspicious interview (s). There might not be evidence of a murder yet but things are leaning that way based on Mrs smith's Comments.I have not disclosed who I think they might be looking at so lets not get all worked up in a lather. Maybe you should try following what is going on instead of playing your game. No one is interested in your family feud game in a forum for a Missing girl.

"maybe" doesn't count.
no POIs or subjects have been officially named. i think you're ahead of yourself.
and, BTW, who has assigned you to your tasks? a fake PI? have you considered offering up your expertise to the authorities?

No I have not considered 'waiting patiently' it's not in my nature. But you can wait all you want if that's your thing. To each his own.

I don't think we have little information, I think we have a lot of information actually but no real answers yet. I am confident the truth will come out. I think that more so now than ever before in these 8 years.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
the point you are trying to make relative to my reply escapes me.

sorry I can't help you with comprehension. Your on your own to figure it out. Maybe try re reading

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
"maybe" doesn't count.
no POIs or subjects have been officially named. i think you're ahead of yourself.
and, BTW, who has assigned you to your tasks? a fake PI? have you considered offering up your expertise to the authorities?

I actually am here because I am interested in the case > I am here on my own accord in spite of your efforts to deflect conversation.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
"maybe" doesn't count.
no POIs or subjects have been officially named. i think you're ahead of yourself.
and, BTW, who has assigned you to your tasks? a fake PI? have you considered offering up your expertise to the authorities?

Not officially named but there are two POI.You like to play semantics.My cover up meter is off the charts.

The 2 Brothers....

What time do the night shift snowmakers start at Loon Mtn.?

John

The 2 brothers....

Did they work for Snowmaking or Grooming operations.?

John

How can authorities 'state' that Maitland and Murray disappearances are unrelated? They don't even know what happened to either of the girls. They certainly can't be sure. Although I do think the Maitland case had some drug activity involved and not so with Maura.

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
I actually am here because I am interested in the case > I am here on my own accord in spite of your efforts to deflect conversation.

but can you be effective? are your efforts helpful? do you profess to be knowledgeable or skilled in a certain area of expertise? if you were....would you be believed, anyway? or would every effort be made by transient, anonymous posters on free-for-all forum to discredit what you bring to the conversation?

folks that have been here much longer than you are telling you that every possible aspect of "the case" has been researched, debated, reported and rerun....but you think you are more capable, smarter than and more intuitive than all of the others before you? somehow, that hasn't been demonstrated.
do what you wish.....the only loss is your time.