Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
I also find it very unlikely that the log was altered for a sinister purpose but it's very confusing as to why there would be this gap.

Jenkins wrote:

It's very possible that her backpack or some other belongings have been found but never were turned in to LE bc whoever found them thought that someone just lost them and had no idea it could b related to a dissapearance.
We have to remember that contrary to popular belief on this board that most people have never heard of Maura or this case, including locals.
I lived in the area for 12 ys and no one I ever mentioned this case to ever heard of it, including my roommate who lived in woodsville his entire life.
It sucks but it's true, the average Joe on the street in Nh has never heard of Maura Murray or her disappearance

Judged:

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
The link was already posted by a couple different posters a page or 2 back.
I also find it very unlikely that the log was altered for a sinister purpose but it's very confusing as to why there would be this gap.
Is this common in grafton county or anywhere?
I just find it extremely odd that the log is missing the time before the crash, which is exactly the time in question about a possible earlier crash.
I'd say the more important question is why does the log state that she was travelling eastbound and her car was found facing westbound on the westbound side of the road, when we've been told all along that the car was facing westbound on the eastbound side of the road.
How is there so many questions about one simple car accident?
First of all the family was shown the wrong spot to where the car crashesd( near the big pine tree when it was actually 400' down the road)
& now we come to find out it was on the other side of the road?
What is going on here? At best it's bad recording/police procedure...but when there's a beautiful young college girl missing on top of it it begins to look potentially sinister.
Again, I'm not saying this is proof of anything. Clearly you'd never be able to prove anything either way by looking at these logs.
I'm just asking what the hell is going on here?
Is it common for police logs to be missing hours of times and have glaring inconsistencies?
Who would even have the power to change/remove things from the log, would the chief of Haverhill even b able to do that?
As with most things about this case the more info you see, the more questions it raises.
You would think the the police logs would at least not be a question.
Then you got columbo saying he's seen te entry for an accident st 7:03. Did this really happen or is he just making it up? Pretty f'd up to make something like that up IMO, but when it comes to this case I wouldn't put it past people.

Judged:

2

2

2

Simply Sarcasm wrote:

<quoted text>
My apologies. You said I was 'wrong' and that I was trying to 'make you look bad.' In reality, I was neither. I was stating that you guys shouldn't have brought up the issue of her posts on other forums, and that they were bizarre, etc. and then expect no one to Google and try to figure it out - thinking it was of some relevance. That's all, Paris.

Judged:

1

Jenkins wrote:

It's very possible that her backpack or some other belongings have been found but never were turned in to LE bc whoever found them thought that someone just lost them and had no idea it could b related to a dissapearance.
We have to remember that contrary to popular belief on this board that most people have never heard of Maura or this case, including locals.
I lived in the area for 12 ys and no one I ever mentioned this case to ever heard of it, including my roommate who lived in woodsville his entire life.
It sucks but it's true, the average Joe on the street in Nh has never heard of Maura Murray or her disappearance

Judged:

1

1

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
The link was already posted by a couple different posters a page or 2 back.
I also find it very unlikely that the log was altered for a sinister purpose but it's very confusing as to why there would be this gap.
Is this common in grafton county or anywhere?
I just find it extremely odd that the log is missing the time before the crash, which is exactly the time in question about a possible earlier crash.
I'd say the more important question is why does the log state that she was travelling eastbound and her car was found facing westbound on the westbound side of the road, when we've been told all along that the car was facing westbound on the eastbound side of the road.
How is there so many questions about one simple car accident?
First of all the family was shown the wrong spot to where the car crashesd( near the big pine tree when it was actually 400' down the road)
& now we come to find out it was on the other side of the road?
What is going on here? At best it's bad recording/police procedure...but when there's a beautiful young college girl missing on top of it it begins to look potentially sinister.
Again, I'm not saying this is proof of anything. Clearly you'd never be able to prove anything either way by looking at these logs.
I'm just asking what the hell is going on here?
Is it common for police logs to be missing hours of times and have glaring inconsistencies?
Who would even have the power to change/remove things from the log, would the chief of Haverhill even b able to do that?
As with most things about this case the more info you see, the more questions it raises.
You would think the the police logs would at least not be a question.
Then you got columbo saying he's seen te entry for an accident st 7:03. Did this really happen or is he just making it up? Pretty f'd up to make something like that up IMO, but when it comes to this case I wouldn't put it past people.

Judged:

2

2

Simply Sarcasm wrote:

Is it being/has it been suggested that the log was altered? I'd find that very unlikely.
---
It's interesting re-reading the posts about Christopher Flynn (went missing near where Maura's car was found, was ultimately found to have 'walked away' willingly). How easy it is to jump to conclusions, and all that.

Judged:

4

2

1

Snowy wrote:

bizarre
adjective
bizarre sculptures: strange, peculiar, odd, funny, curious, outlandish, outré, abnormal, eccentric, unconventional, unusual, unorthodox, queer, extraordinary; informal weird, wacky, bizarro, oddball, way out, kooky, freaky, off the wall, offbeat. ANTONYMS normal, conventional.
********
i attempt to use words as precisely as i can, and often qualify words, phrases and statements as being "imo" or "JMO".
i don't hold anyone else to that same standard, with the exception of flat statements made without proof...such as "MM was murdered." or "MM was abducted."

Judged:

1

1

1

Bumping for Maura wrote:

Reading through the forum posts of the last 24 hours it would seem that there were at least three LE officers at various times at the site of Maura´s crashed Saturn:
1. Haverhill PD Officer Cecil Smith (who wrote and signed the official accident report)
2. Another, publicly "unnamed" Haverhill PD Officer
3. NHSP Trooper JKM
From what I understand only the name of CS is entered on the official logs of Haverhill PD, while the names of the other two LEO´s are nowhere to be found on any official documents seen by the public.
Am I getting this right?

Simply Sarcasm wrote:

Is it being/has it been suggested that the log was altered? I'd find that very unlikely.
---
It's interesting re-reading the posts about Christopher Flynn (went missing near where Maura's car was found, was ultimately found to have 'walked away' willingly). How easy it is to jump to conclusions, and all that.

Brilliant Brian wrote:

<quoted text>
This is simply a question, I have nothing new, I am just wondering if anyone knows what brand of backpack Maura had at the time of her disappearance? Has it been made public? If anyone knows could they message it to me please?

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Snowy, I know we are not BFFs or anything. But I am gay and I was not offended by what you said, for what it's worth. I am hoping this was all a misunderstanding and everyone can move along.

Judged:

1

1

1

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't know if anyone thinks it was altered, so much as parts redacted. With your legal experience, I'm sure you know the difference.

Judged:

2

2

2

Det Columbo wrote:

That's why all original accounts of the accident time were at 7:05 PM as stated by Chief Williams and NHSP as well as in Newspaper accounts. AND then it all changed.!
John (19 hrs ago | post #15047)

Judged:

1

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
amy, are you aware this person claims to have legal experience?