Maura Murray

Judged:

4

3

3

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
two wrongs never make a right.
standing up is good and right.
the original MMM forum was a runaway train, and the shift to other forums did not improve the ride.
a decent, civil tone, or heartfelt comments with an appeal to beneficial intervention were all ignored. it was, and still is, a war of beliefs without the benefit of factual information.
in terms of relationships, there is a point where the line becomes blurred; when the tide becomes a tsunami, and each individual balances his/her experiences against responses.

Judged:

2

Det Columbo wrote:

According to interviews with EMS and FD, Officer Smith was not at the scene when they showed up. This would have been at 7:56 and 7:57.
**********
Why was Smith not at the scene when they showed up? Where did He go.?
How long was the car unattended at the location it was found after Smith showed up at 7:46.?
WHY did He leave the car unattended at the scene with NO WARNING to other drivers on the road that night.?
WHY after EMS and FD showed up did Smith and Monaghan show back up at the scene.?
Where had they both gone or did they meet up, how did they arrive back at the scene at the same time.?
John

Judged:

2

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
He bought that house and moved to BHR only a couple of years ago.
Nowhere near the time of the accident.

Judged:

2

1

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
I may be heading over the mountain in a while. Would you be interested in meeting at a public place of your choice? DD's, McD's etc.Bet we'd have a lot to talk about.

Judged:

3

2

2

citigirl wrote:

two wrongs never make a right.
standing up is good and right.
the original MMM forum was a runaway train, and the shift to other forums did not improve the ride.
a decent, civil tone, or heartfelt comments with an appeal to beneficial intervention were all ignored. it was, and still is, a war of beliefs without the benefit of factual information.
in terms of relationships, there is a point where the line becomes blurred; when the tide becomes a tsunami, and each individual balances his/her experiences against responsestwo wrongs never make a right.
standing up is good and right.
the original MMM forum was a runaway train, and the shift to other forums did not improve the ride.
a decent, civil tone, or heartfelt comments with an appeal to beneficial intervention were all ignored. it was, and still is, a war of beliefs without the benefit of factual information.
in terms of relationships, there is a point where the line becomes blurred; when the tide becomes a tsunami, and each individual balances his/her experiences against responses. Snowy "a decent, civil tone,or heartfelt comments with appeal to beneficial intervention were all ignored.it was and still is, a war of beliefs without the benefit of factual information." Snowy " citigirl you suck" Maybe you should practice what you preach.

Judged:

1

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
John he may have been searching with SBD at the time?Or interviewing witnesses.

Judged:

3

3

jwb wrote:

<quoted text>
John he may have been searching with SBD at the time?Or interviewing witnesses.

Judged:

4

4

4

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand. What I meant to say was speculating about a specific person's private life on a public forum, whether or not that person's private life is related to a possible crime, would be a moral dilemma for me regardless of who started it.

Judged:

3

3

2

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand. What I meant to say was speculating about a specific person's private life on a public forum, whether or not that person's private life is related to a possible crime, would be a moral dilemma for me regardless of who started it.
I have made such mistakes in the past, mostly elsewhere online and unrelated to this case, and then owed profuse apologies. Related to MM, for example, I should not have speculated about Beagle. Hence my later apology to him. I felt terrible about it and still do.
People say "it's just the internet, none of this is real," but there are real people behind the screen names reading those words. The potential damage is unknown. I am also of a different generation, where as many as half of my "real life" friends are people I've first met on the internet. So you are all real to me. That said, other peoples' relationships with each other are none of my business. I am not sure what you meant by that last part.
Sorry for rambling. I just want you to know where I'm coming from on why I won't speculate further on Mr. Murray or anyone else. I'm too tired to edit this down to anything that might make sense, but hopefully you get the gist. Probably best for a private message, but you don't have that enabled.
I hope Wowzer brings us back some coffee.:-)

Judged:

2

2

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
it is strange, indeed, that while i have abided by the specific requests of several individuals to be discreet, they choose, directly or by their agents, to violate me.
their names remain at the tip of my tongue.

Judged:

2

1

1

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
of course. "outing" has been a fun game for the PBB, as you saw with Beagle's circumstances.
again, the issue of FM is specific to an individual who has chosen to discuss the circumstances of his daughter's gone missing to the public.
his online representatives have intentionally caused distress to private citizens who have, otherwise, chosen to maintain their privacy and identities; again, in the name of MM, and off-topic, as well.
it was a certain, pointy individual who tortured a local poster into never returning to this conversation, by accusing her of seeking favors with the police to provide access to info and documents regarding MM.
a particularly memorable and disgusting reference was to excrement dripping from the sides of the poster's mouth.
one is still here; and one is gone.
the more vulgar of the two remains.
yes, i have an option for PM which i may engage....it's a pretty busy week. will catch up with you, amy, although the summary is fairly complete.
i don't follow other cases of missing persons as some do here, so i don't know what is the norm in terms of ugliness or the dynamics of group hostilities. it's surely something that's been in practice here.

Judged:

1

backspace4me wrote:

<quoted text>
Was his car still there or did they both arrive with their cars? Do you know?

looking4amoose wrote:

<quoted text>He's been there at least 5 years----pulled me over on my ATV when I first got it