FrmLE
Vero Beach, FL
|
What is the actual definition of 'going bonkers' anyway? lol
|
mcsmom
Hebron, CT
|
The Maura Murray in Hingham, MA is 65+ years old.....
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
FrmLE wrote: What is the actual definition of 'going bonkers' anyway? lol Yeah. I remember seeing many dogs, "hit". Usually consisted of them sitting, or looking at the handler. Or sometimes, oh I get it, they would go bonkers by a bark or scrape. I don't ever remember any of them going what I would call bonkers but I have only seen real dogs with real handlers. Oh, by the way, anyone want to guess who was the first person I remember hearing give that description? Take a guess. Bill
|
Since: Mar 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
mcsmom wrote: The Maura Murray in Hingham, MA is 65+ years old..... Are you posting this in relation to the personal injury case documents that Renner posted?
|
Since: Mar 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Also,upon reviewing Renners document uploads,he has posted a request for documents&reciept from an Ed Lanpher of E. Hampstead NH...Who is Ed Lanpher?
|
Interesting
AOL
|
WTH-the-original wrote: <quoted text> Yeah. I remember seeing many dogs, "hit". Usually consisted of them sitting, or looking at the handler. Or sometimes, oh I get it, they would go bonkers by a bark or scrape. I don't ever remember any of them going what I would call bonkers but I have only seen real dogs with real handlers. Oh, by the way, anyone want to guess who was the first person I remember hearing give that description? Take a guess. Bill Hopefully your not talking about Troop F, K-9 unit, as they still think they can use freshely washed clothes to pick =-up a scent.
|
mcsmom
Hebron, CT
|
findmaura wrote: <quoted text> Are you posting this in relation to the personal injury case documents that Renner posted? Yes. Sorry I didn't clarify this at the time.
|
Bumping for Maura
Åseda, Sweden
|
findmaura wrote: Also,upon reviewing Renners document uploads,he has posted a request for documents&reciept from an Ed Lanpher of E. Hampstead NH...Who is Ed Lanpher? findmaura, Yours is a relevant question. As far as Iīve been unable to find out E.L. is an elderly gentleman and apparently the only person who has been requesting the documents in question. A wild guess only: Could E.L. possibly have been giving Maura a lift at some point, before she continued on somewhere else? I actually feel very sorry for him, having his name "outed" by Mr Renner on his web site.
|
Stud
Crab Orchard, KY
|
Bumping for Maura wrote: <quoted text> findmaura, Yours is a relevant question. As far as Iīve been unable to find out E.L. is an elderly gentleman and apparently the only person who has been requesting the documents in question. A wild guess only: Could E.L. possibly have been giving Maura a lift at some point, before she continued on somewhere else? I actually feel very sorry for him, having his name "outed" by Mr Renner on his web site. A wild guess. Is that all you can do is guess. As many people you clowns have drug through the mud here and people you've suspected or wrongly accused, you have no right to feel sorry for anyone. Creep.
|
Bumping for Maura
Åseda, Sweden
|
Stud, Are you completely unhinged or what is the matter with you??? Seriously... Some basic advice for you: Donīt blame the messenger, blame Mr Renner for putting names out there in the public realm if you must have someone to blame. I donīt know why Mr Renner chose to do what he did, but whatever his reasons, people are bound to speculate one way or other. Like it or not, but thatīs human nature, and the Renner MM blog seems to be pretty much the only effort being made in order to advance the MM case out there.
|
GrampaMo
Schenectady, NY
|
Bumping for Maura wrote: Stud, Are you completely unhinged or what is the matter with you??? Seriously... Some basic advice for you: Donīt blame the messenger, blame Mr Renner for putting names out there in the public realm if you must have someone to blame. I donīt know why Mr Renner chose to do what he did, but whatever his reasons, people are bound to speculate one way or other. Like it or not, but thatīs human nature, and the Renner MM blog seems to be pretty much the only effort being made in order to advance the MM case out there. You put him in a suspicious light just by saying that you wonder if he could have given her a ride. One more poor innocent to drag through the mud. Can you put a link to where Renner said anything about this person to give people reason to believe he saw, gave a ride to or helped or hurt Maura in any way because I must have missed it?
|
Since: Mar 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Bumping for Maura wrote: <quoted text> findmaura, Yours is a relevant question. As far as Iīve been unable to find out E.L. is an elderly gentleman and apparently the only person who has been requesting the documents in question. A wild guess only: Could E.L. possibly have been giving Maura a lift at some point, before she continued on somewhere else? I actually feel very sorry for him, having his name "outed" by Mr Renner on his web site. maybe a relative?An interested search party member?Or not...Renner thought it important enough to include..I hope he explains this document as he should.
|
Stud
Crab Orchard, KY
|
findmaura wrote: <quoted text> maybe a relative?An interested search party member?Or not...Renner thought it important enough to include..I hope he explains this document as he should. he don't have to explain jack to the 5 or 6 nitwits on this thread.
|
Stud
Crab Orchard, KY
|
GrampaMo wrote: <quoted text> You put him in a suspicious light just by saying that you wonder if he could have given her a ride. One more poor innocent to drag through the mud. Can you put a link to where Renner said anything about this person to give people reason to believe he saw, gave a ride to or helped or hurt Maura in any way because I must have missed it? Exactly. A few here come off with wild assumptions, assume they're true , then tear James down for trying to help.
|
Simply Caustic
Homer Glen, IL
|
Respectfully, I don't see why it's Renner's responsibility to explain the doc. He merely included all the information gleaned from his FOIA request. Any of us would also be privy to the name of the gentleman in question, had we requested the docs.
|
Simply Caustic
Homer Glen, IL
|
Further, I think it's entirely possible...well, really, probable...that E.L. was simply interested and requested the docs. He wrote in his letter, sent his fee, etc. and of course, his information remains in the public realm. As one who requested docs himself, I fail to see why he would be surprised that his name was then filed away, as a requestor. I think to speculate that he had any or all involvement defies credulity. Were he a possible candidate for any involvement in Maura's accident and subsequent disappearance, the letter w/ his request for information would never have been released to Renner. It would have been classified as part of the ongoing investigation, and therefore unavailable (per the court ruling).
|
Bumping for Maura
Åseda, Sweden
|
Well, well... How very sensitive we all seem to have become all of a sudden! I guess that the current absence of most of the long-time contributors here is taking its toll on the "conversation"... Frankly, some of you seem to be taking yourselves way too seriously. I can sense a nasty stench of censorship tendencies displayed by a number of posters as of late. Self-imposed policing of what is being written here or not gives off a foul smell indeed. Ugly, ugly...
|
hannah_b
Sweden
|
EL is probably just another armchair sleuth, just like us.
|
“"Dancing with wolves"”
Since: Oct 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Bumping for Maura wrote: Well, well... How very sensitive we all seem to have become all of a sudden! I guess that the current absence of most of the long-time contributors here is taking its toll on the "conversation"... Frankly, some of you seem to be taking yourselves way too seriously. I can sense a nasty stench of censorship tendencies displayed by a number of posters as of late. Self-imposed policing of what is being written here or not gives off a foul smell indeed. Ugly, ugly... Maybe some that are posting ARE long time contributers or lurkers and have seen the damage that can be done when even a "wild dream" of there being a possibility that someone's name that was brought up might have had something to do with Maura disappearing. Many here have already seen that on this forum people are NOT innocent until proven guilty but guilty until proven innocent and in many cases the innocent don't even realize they need to defend themselves and their reputations against accusations of crimes...until someone tells them in the store, at work,calls them etc. about what's being said on an internet forum. And no I don't think we ALL have become more sensitive. Just the posters that know right from wrong and have the decency to not drag someones name thru the mud for no reason. I agree with the foul smell and nasty stench but I believe it might be coming from all the BS. It's getting hard to haul it all away so it's piling up.Ugly, ugly!
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text> Maybe some that are posting ARE long time contributers or lurkers and have seen the damage that can be done when even a "wild dream" of there being a possibility that someone's name that was brought up might have had something to do with Maura disappearing. Many here have already seen that on this forum people are NOT innocent until proven guilty but guilty until proven innocent and in many cases the innocent don't even realize they need to defend themselves and their reputations against accusations of crimes...until someone tells them in the store, at work,calls them etc. about what's being said on an internet forum. And no I don't think we ALL have become more sensitive. Just the posters that know right from wrong and have the decency to not drag someones name thru the mud for no reason. I agree with the foul smell and nasty stench but I believe it might be coming from all the BS. It's getting hard to haul it all away so it's piling up.Ugly, ugly! I couldn't have said it better. Absolutely no reason not to redact peoples names who have no known direct connection to this case. Bill
|
|