Maura Murray

Judged:

2

1

1

jldross wrote:

James Renner blogged that he has not reviewed all the documents he posted, so I wouldn't assume that just because he posted a certain document that it's related to Maura's disappearance. For example the personal injury case or the man who requested a copy of the court decision. When you do a freedom of information act request they will send anything related to the name or case or file you requested, unless it is sealed, but after you go through the documents you will find that a lot is unrelated to what you wanted to know.

Judged:

4

4

4

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I couldn't have said it better.
Absolutely no reason not to redact peoples names who have no known direct connection to this case.
Bill

Judged:

3

3

3

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I read some of the articles and one of them that stands out is Nancy Smith writing her response to FM's ROI. In it she writes that Maura's car was surrendered by FM to the storage facility. I find it odd for someone who wants so much information who would surrender the vehicle over so quickly.

Judged:

2

2

2

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe at the time FM thought the car had been properly processed by investigators.If my daughter were missing my thought process would be amiss.

Judged:

2

2

2

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Maybe at the time FM thought the car had been properly processed by investigators.If my daughter were missing my thought process would be amiss.

Judged:

4

4

4

Bumping for Maura wrote:

Mr Stud,
You´re a conceited self-important moron and a fool, Mr Know-it-all.
Why don´t you start your own forum where you can reign supreme according to your dictatorial tendencies.
You have pretty much hijacked this forum and have turned into a far, far worse place than ever before.
Meaningful discussions are no longer possible here due to your misplaced interventions and absurdly cavalier attitude.
Nasty, nasty indeed, but I guess you´re having the time of your life right now...Congratulations!

Judged:

4

4

3

Stud wrote:

Thanks for the compliments. This forum is nothing more than bickering or mudd slinging. I feel for the Murray family. You know they've read this site and stand in disbelief that their loved ones life is nothing more than a platform for a handful of creeps to obsess over. How many rumors have been started here ? Good names ruined? James Renner has done good, solid work to help solve this mystery. But some of you are so jealous of his accomplishments and access, you have to tear him down. Sad.

Judged:

2

2

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand that new people might look at Renners blog and think he "discovered" all sorts of new things. Fact is, there is not one item, except for a couple of very dated documents that he has "released" and that I might add seem to have absolutely no bearing on the case whatsoever. So he has broken no new ground. He has managed to throw some other names, likely with no bearing on the case into the public domain. So, if you would like to enumerate his "findings", several of us here, can tell you when we heard/read about it. Much of it was years ago. Some of the documents have been worked over to death, such as the accident report, all of Fred's filings and the courts decisions. His thirty year old arrest report for OUI has what bearing on the case? A medical call to old address has what bearing on the case? The mentioning of EL has what bearing on the case? Maybe Shack can start passing his name around as the most likely culprit in her "murder" mystery.
All that is still known (in the public domain) about this case is a young college student ran away from a crashed car while drinking after concocting a story to get away from school so no one would be suspicious about her absence?
As far as "family" reading the site here. That is their prerogative, it's a public forum. If they think they will get useful information from here then they would be bigger idiots than some of the people that post here. If they want kinder, gentler idiots, then they can visit webslothes. Nothing useful there either, but they play nicer.
Bill

Judged:

2

2

1

Stud wrote:

Thanks for the compliments. This forum is nothing more than bickering or mudd slinging. I feel for the Murray family. You know they've read this site and stand in disbelief that their loved ones life is nothing more than a platform for a handful of creeps to obsess over. How many rumors have been started here ? Good names ruined? James Renner has done good, solid work to help solve this mystery. But some of you are so jealous of his accomplishments and access, you have to tear him down. Sad.

Judged:

5

5

5

Stud wrote:

If indeed I have hijacked this site, I will now go. Thank you guys who took up for me. Good luck.

Judged:

5

5

5

Stud wrote:

If indeed I have hijacked this site, I will now go. Thank you guys who took up for me. Good luck.

Judged:

4

4

3

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
You certainly haven't hijacked the site.Don't be driven away by one or two. I made that mistake until it dawned on me that that is exactly what they wanted.

Judged:

6

6

6

GrampaMo wrote:

<quoted text>
Good to see you back wowzer.

Judged:

5

4

3

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree, good to see you back wowzer, and yes. Don't let people drive you off this forum. Everyone's opinion doesn't matter here. Some less than others. 8-)
Bill