Maura Murray

Judged:

2

2

2

findmaura wrote:

Jenkins,I agree the ATM video thing has always seemed odd.Maybe Citigirl could offer insight..Why wouldnt they allow the family to I.D. her on the video?It must contain some strong evidence.
Jenkins,I for 1 enjoy your posts..I think you make the hidden agenda gang nervous hence their neverending attacks.

Judged:

5

5

3

JWB wrote:

A hidden agenda is an undisclosed plan, especially one with an ulterior motive. The agenda is generally visable but, one can only surmise at to what the reasonings or motive is behind it.(hence hidden agenda)

Judged:

3

3

2

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, thanks for explaining the definition of "hidden agenda".
That explains all the untruths and false accusations we've been told for over 8 years. An undisclosed plan with an ulterior motive.
I doubt we'll ever know the motive behind it.

Judged:

1

1

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow, thanks for explaining the definition of "hidden agenda".
That explains all the untruths and false accusations we've been told for over 8 years. An undisclosed plan with an ulterior motive.
I doubt we'll ever know the motive behind it.

Judged:

3

3

3

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
Well, what do ya know, the hidden agenda queen herself. The word agenda comes up and she crawls out of her cave. I don't remember the name Wowzer even coming up. I guess hidden agenda must qapply to Wowzer.

Judged:

2

2

2

Wowzers advisor wrote:

<quoted text>
I advised you not chat with JWB.This is my last reminder . I will have to cease my advisorship on your behalf if you continue ignore my advice.

Judged:

1

1

1

JWB wrote:

A hidden agenda is an undisclosed plan, especially one with an ulterior motive. The agenda is generally visable but, one can only surmise at to what the reasonings or motive is behind it.(hence hidden agenda)

Judged:

1

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
So what can we surmise about the meaning "squawalk" and why would someone say that? If he really didn't think she was going to kill herself then why say it?

Judged:

1

1

1

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi Lighthouse. Just my opinion but I don't put a lot of weight behind the squaw walk statement. Keep in mind that he and other family members were also on the news at the beginning begging her to come home and saying that she wouldn't get in trouble

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
Hahhhaa, you really made me chuckle, thanks Amy!
As you all know I try very hard to maintain my anonymity on this forum, for obvious reasons. For that reason I will decline comment other than to say I will not be able to reply later this evening, I have other obligations in the Charlotte, NC area.:)
Hope for change.

Judged:

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
This is also another opinion I'd like to make(its my opinion and could be wrong). Her family is appealing to her on the news reports that I saw. I never saw a news clip that shows the family pleading to her kidnapper if she was kidnapped. Did that happen? Cause all I see is family trying to reason to her.

Judged:

2

2

2

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not sure if there was one but I didn't see any appeal to an abductor.

Judged:

1

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I can't seem to find one. If everything was going great and everything was fine in her life. You would think kidnap by third party would be the first thing that comes to mind.
However the pleas from family are made to MM and not to anyone else. So at that moment I think that they thought she was still incontrol of her own destiny. Foul Play (which kidnapping would have to happen first to get her away from the car) was not introduced until much later.

Judged:

3

3

2

Orko Kringer wrote:

<quoted text>
IMO, a Foul play Boogeyman theory was used as a gimmick to put pressure on the investigators.
Fred and Maura's mother were both very unhappy with the way the investigators were treating their daughter's case and they had to do something to bring attention to the way the case was being handled.

Judged:

1

1

1

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
Not for nothing, in my experience nearly every parent or family member of a missing person or unsolved crime is unhappy with the way investigator's treat the case. I simply that this as a point of fact with no intended inference.
In our business there are fairly few happy victims, it is the nature of the job, we deal with mostly unfortunate situations. Even if we find the suspect, arrest them and convict them unless they get the death sentence the family often feels the sentence isn't long enough, harsh enough.
Missing persons are especially tough, because unless you find the person happy healthy and quickly, the family mostly thinks police didn't do enough, didn't devote enough resources, wasn't smart enough, etc.
This case is a perfect example, consider that on the night of the accident this was an extremely common accident situation cops face all the time. A Single car crash at night where alcohol is involved and the driver leaves the scene to avoid police.
THIS Happens ALL THE TIME, however in this case countless people continue to say that the cops didn't do enough, why wasn't there a full scale search, why didn't they go East instead of west, why wasn't the National Guard called out, why no dogs, why why why..
See? It is the nature of the job, and frankly I am sure if it was my kid I would probably lose all objectivity and feel the same way. Personal loss defies common sense and rational thinking. Just look at the other thread, Patric McCarthy's family refuses the accept the truth because it hurts so much. I get it.