“"Dancing with wolves"”
Since: Oct 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Jenkins wrote: <quoted text> Ok wowzer, I guess I didn't understand what you were saying; I thought you were saying that I was making up the fact that the trailer was searched at all. So then when I read you saying something about you previously thinking the trailer was searched at its destination I was like wtf? I figured the location where it was searched was incidental, the point was that it was searched. Sorry, I totally misunderstood what you were saying. Maybe I'm a little jumpy lol about that because I'm tired of people accusing me of making shit up when after all this time nobody has ever shown one thing that I've made up, it's not gonna happen, no way, it's literally impossible. But sorry bout that, not tryin to start shit here Jenking wrote:***when after all this time nobody has ever shown one thing that I've made up, it's not gonna happen, no way, it's literally impossible.*** Umm, I think I just did. Do you not consider the story you told about the SP pulling the trailer over and searching it on the road a made up story?? No problem Jenkins but when I see something that I know isn't true I feel I should speak up as there's already been enough BS here through the years to fertilize every garden in the US and beyond. BS isn't helpful to anyone. It just muddies the water even further than what it already is.
|
Since: Feb 12
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text> Jenking wrote:***when after all this time nobody has ever shown one thing that I've made up, it's not gonna happen, no way, it's literally impossible.*** Umm, I think I just did. Do you not consider the story you told about the SP pulling the trailer over and searching it on the road a made up story?? No problem Jenkins but when I see something that I know isn't true I feel I should speak up as there's already been enough BS here through the years to fertilize every garden in the US and beyond. BS isn't helpful to anyone. It just muddies the water even further than what it already is. Hi Wowzer. To be fair, Jenkins did not make this up about the trailer being pulled over and searched. I read this a while ago also on Renner's blog. His source was an interview with a couple who lived across from RF on BHR (I won't post their names on t he forum, but they are included in his interview). So if this information is wrong, then it could be that Renner's source was mistaken. But Jenkins didn't make this up. I believed it also when I read it. http://mauramurray.blogspot.com/2011/08/forge...
|
Bumping for Maura
Norberg, Sweden
|
Judged:
1
aftermath wrote: <quoted text> Bumping for Maura, If I recall accurately, he arrived at beginning of one sememester and she arrived at the beginning of the following semester. Would like to know if there was a red pickup truck registered at U of Mass for fall 2003 & sping 2004. He may have arrived spring of 2003 but do not believe this to be the case. He had nothing to do w/her disappearance, but bet he was baffled when he could not find her and she did not show up anywhere. He did not come forward for the same reason they told no one of their trip. Someone needs to check out the possibility of a red pickup registered for parking (student/staff/faculty) at U of Mass for fall 2003 & spring of 2004. Most people logically tell someone when they decide to take a trip...but if someone travels along in a second vehicle, maybe it seems less necessary to tell a third party about the plan. This may have been why she risked driving the Saturn which had seen its better days....someone had accompanied her on the trip but was in a second vehicle. Too coincidental that Maura and this fellow arrived on campus within approx. 4 months of each other and both had previously been at WP. aftermath, I pretty much concur with your writings there. However, IŽd be interested to hear your views as for what you believe happened to Maura while her likely friend/boyfriend driving the red truck failed to find her by her crashed car. Thanks.
|
Since: Nov 08
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Judged:
2
1
Jenkins wrote: <quoted text> Hey bill I hope you know that comment was made all in good fun, I thought it was funny and I figured u would too, I really wasn't trying to insult you. Obviously not all engineers are socially inept and i bet you are laughing you way to the bank. Obviously that stereotype, like most stereotypes, arent necessarily true; but they're usually funny. And while engineering does have a higher percentage of people that aren't exactly "people persons"; they're obviously all not socially inept. Lighten up buddy. I'm glad to hear your son has the knack too, in reality engineering is a really cool profession; he'll be stacked with dough and it seems like a really interesting job, don't get much better than that. I agree that many aren't necessarily people person's. I thought it was funny the first time I saw it on TV and still laughed when the youtube video was presented. Absolutely no offense taken. I know I mentioned the money thing but really, as with any parent, what I really want for my kids is that they are happy. He just also happens to enjoy the kind of work I do. Bill
|
“"Dancing with wolves"”
Since: Oct 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
Jenkins wrote: <quoted text> Ok wowzer, I guess I didn't understand what you were saying; I thought you were saying that I was making up the fact that the trailer was searched at all. So then when I read you saying something about you previously thinking the trailer was searched at its destination I was like wtf? I figured the location where it was searched was incidental, the point was that it was searched. Sorry, I totally misunderstood what you were saying. Maybe I'm a little jumpy lol about that because I'm tired of people accusing me of making shit up when after all this time nobody has ever shown one thing that I've made up, it's not gonna happen, no way, it's literally impossible. But sorry bout that, not tryin to start shit here Sorry bout that too Jenkins. I guess I didn't understand that you're "facts" were taken from Renner's blog till Amy posted the link. I still don't believe it though and this is why. If you're familiar with the route from BHR to Lyme where the trailer was taken you would know that the roads are not wide enough to pull a 10 or 12 foot wide by 50 or 60 foot long trailer over. There's permits needed for each town driven through and a direct safe route when you are pulling a mobile home. I can only think of a couple of places where it might have been able to pull over but why take that chance when you can just wait till it's parked safely at it's destination and take your time searching it. I also think that a search warrant would still be needed if the trailer hadn't been signed over to the new owner yet. If it was signed over and the new owner gave permission for the search then why the need to pull it over and not wait till it was safely parked?
|
“"Dancing with wolves"”
Since: Oct 10
Location hidden
|
Please wait...
amy researches wrote: <quoted text> Hi Wowzer. To be fair, Jenkins did not make this up about the trailer being pulled over and searched. I read this a while ago also on Renner's blog. His source was an interview with a couple who lived across from RF on BHR (I won't post their names on t he forum, but they are included in his interview). So if this information is wrong, then it could be that Renner's source was mistaken. But Jenkins didn't make this up. I believed it also when I read it. http://mauramurray.blogspot.com/2011/08/forge... Thank you for the link.
|
JWB
Portland, ME
|
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text> It wasn't Helena's site unless they were tracking there also. According to renners Blog it was the forum Administered by Helena Dwyer. What forum are you referring to ? http://mauramurray.blogspot.com/search...
|
JWB
Portland, ME
|
Judged:
1
1
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text> Sorry bout that too Jenkins. I guess I didn't understand that you're "facts" were taken from Renner's blog till Amy posted the link. I still don't believe it though and this is why. If you're familiar with the route from BHR to Lyme where the trailer was taken you would know that the roads are not wide enough to pull a 10 or 12 foot wide by 50 or 60 foot long trailer over. There's permits needed for each town driven through and a direct safe route when you are pulling a mobile home. I can only think of a couple of places where it might have been able to pull over but why take that chance when you can just wait till it's parked safely at it's destination and take your time searching it. I also think that a search warrant would still be needed if the trailer hadn't been signed over to the new owner yet. If it was signed over and the new owner gave permission for the search then why the need to pull it over and not wait till it was safely parked? I posted the article right in the start of the conversation about the trailer being pulled over. remember Rusty Cowles ?
|
JWB
Portland, ME
|
Judged:
1
1
Jenkins wrote: <quoted text> I also find it highly interesting that they tried to find out who "observer" was rather than the person who wrote the first post. This is obviously 100% opinion but could it possibly mean that there actually is truth in that first post and it is known within the family? My line of thinking on that would be that she was trying to find out which family member or friend it was who was "confirming" the story, ratting them out so to speak. Or maybe she already knew who the first poster was so she didn't need that info. I think that we only get snippets on Renners blog and there is more that we don't know. We will need to buy the book to read more of the facts. It would be total speculating as to whether the post was legit or not. It is good to know that the post did make it into the hands of authorities to decide. I am curious as to when the post was made. I never read the old forum. Does anyone here have a rough idea when?
|
JWB
Portland, ME
|
Judged:
1
JWB wrote: <quoted text> According to renners Blog it was the forum Administered by Helena Dwyer. What forum are you referring to ? http://mauramurray.blogspot.com/search... Wowzer sorry but- I read the article again and I think I misread it. Renner may not have been alluding to Helenas Forum. Do you know what Forum the post came from? was it advocates forum? I never would have picked that up unless you hadn't brought that up Wowzer.
|
Jenkins
Brooklyn, NY
|
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text> Jenking wrote:***when after all this time nobody has ever shown one thing that I've made up, it's not gonna happen, no way, it's literally impossible.*** Umm, I think I just did. Do you not consider the story you told about the SP pulling the trailer over and searching it on the road a made up story?? No problem Jenkins but when I see something that I know isn't true I feel I should speak up as there's already been enough BS here through the years to fertilize every garden in the US and beyond. BS isn't helpful to anyone. It just muddies the water even further than what it already is. You can't be serious right now can you wowzer?? Your still trying to say that I made that up??? Jwb posted the quote from renner's blog; according to rusty cowles(cw's neighbor across the street) they pulled it over on the road and searched it. According to everyone on here it appears that he was wrong and it was searched at its destination but clearly I didn't just make it up!! It came straight from renner's blog and you know it!! Jwb posted it not 2 posts after yours and you even commented on it, so how the hell did I make it up? How could you possibly think I made that up?! How does that make any sense? It's clearly posted on renner's blog, jwb posted the quote and you responded to it, yet I made it up somehow?? What do u think I hacked renner's blog and planted the quote from rusty?? Maybe rusty made it up or the cw made it up and told rusty, but you know for sure I didn't make it up. I was referring to information that was clearly taken from renner's blog. I guess I shouldve questioned it but Renner's blog has been pretty accurate. Also I really didnt think that exactly where it got searched even mattered, the point I was making was that it got searched after leaving the cw's property. You obviously know for a fact that I didn't make it up because jwb clearly posted the quote from renner's blog and you responded to it so I know you saw it. So that would mean that in reality the only made up thing on this page is your accusation that I made it up. Again..how about a little integrity here wowzer, that's pretty bad that your still tryin to accuse me of that...talk about BS
|
Jenkins
Brooklyn, NY
|
Wowzer the real one wrote: <quoted text> Sorry bout that too Jenkins. I guess I didn't understand that you're "facts" were taken from Renner's blog till Amy posted the link. I still don't believe it though and this is why. If you're familiar with the route from BHR to Lyme where the trailer was taken you would know that the roads are not wide enough to pull a 10 or 12 foot wide by 50 or 60 foot long trailer over. There's permits needed for each town driven through and a direct safe route when you are pulling a mobile home. I can only think of a couple of places where it might have been able to pull over but why take that chance when you can just wait till it's parked safely at it's destination and take your time searching it. I also think that a search warrant would still be needed if the trailer hadn't been signed over to the new owner yet. If it was signed over and the new owner gave permission for the search then why the need to pull it over and not wait till it was safely parked? Ok wowzer can we agree that we both were mistaken and nobody is making anything up? Lol
|
Jenkins
Brooklyn, NY
|
How does everybody know that the trailer was searched in Lyme Rather than on the road like rusty said? Shack said something about it having the yellow tape around it, where did you get that info from shack? The only info I have ever seen referring to the trailer being searched is that quote From rusty, was it ever referred to in any news reports? Considering What wowzer said above about all the really thin roads and the permits it would make sense for them to wait until its destination. Wowzer- do you know for sure that it needed permits to be towed on the roads or is that an educated guess? Now that you mention that I would think that it does. I always believed that quote saying it was searched en route because once the trailer is on the move it's technically not a permanent home, its more of a vehicle, which gives it a much lower threshold of probable cause needed to search it. I thought they specifically searched it en route as a clever way to get around the need for a search warrant. If the new owner gave it permission to be searched then they can do it at their leisure, but If they wouldn't, and the cw wouldn't, searching it en route might be the only chance they had. Does anybody have more info on where it was serched or know for a fact that it was searched at its destination? Where are you guys gettin this info from? The only information I've ever seen about this topic was that quote from rusty
|
whiston
North Branford, CT
|
Judged:
1
1
Hi all,I have undestood that Mr.Forcier refused to let the place he was living be searched.As far as I know the corner lot was the closest lot to the where the saturn may have been towed from after it got stuck.Would a trailer need a permit and a police escort to be taken down R.T.112 .Just wondering how local LE could have moved the process along.take care philip
|
Jenkins
Brooklyn, NY
|
Judged:
1
JWB wrote: <quoted text> Wowzer sorry but- I read the article again and I think I misread it. Renner may not have been alluding to Helenas Forum. Do you know what Forum the post came from? was it advocates forum? I never would have picked that up unless you hadn't brought that up Wowzer. I might be wrong but didn't renner say that it came from a geocities forum on Maura, which I've never seen. I may be wrong about this but I don't believe that post was in one of the original MM or MMM boards; I don't remember ever seeing it and I really don't believe that back then on those forums they would allow a post like that to be up for very long at all.
|
gpj
Plymouth, NH
|
Judged:
2
1
it was searched when it arrived at its new owners in lyme nh. the owner gave the permission to do so. i know the owner. it was gone through with a vacuum cleaner top to bottom .
|
citigirl
Brockton, MA
|
Jenkins wrote: Hey citigirl- do you have any thoughts on that post that jwb reposted from renner's blog? What do u think, total bullshit? And what do you think about the post after it where some computer expert(leone) supposedly tracked the IP of the user "observer", who said the story is true and well known to the family, and said that "observer" is you. Do you deny being "observer" and making that post? Was it someone else who just coincidently was posting from your location Or somewhere close by? To be clear I'm not accusing you of being "observer"; I am truly asking you. If you don't want to answer that it's your perogative. Personally I truly hope that the original post is true, except for the part about vasi. IMO that would be so cool if Maura actually ran away and was able to start a new life. According to reports She had expressed a desire to do that in the past and if that's what she wanted to do I really hope that is what she was able to do. According to people that knew her she never expressed any suicidal thoughts, in general she seemed like a really happy person who was fun to be around. Yea she had her problems, just like everyone, but it seems like depression just wasn't one of them. It does not sound like she was a depressed person who was suicidal at all. That just does not jive with what people that knew her said about her. To my knowledge There isn't one person who's ever said she was depressed. I've not read one person who hasn't described her as being happy and smiling all the time. Saying she suddenly became suicidal just doesn't make any sense when you consider what people who knew her say about her. You would think that there would be at least one person saying that she was depressed sometimes, but there isn't. If anything it sounds like she would try to go start a new life before she would commit suicide. Sadly it looks like she was abducted and killed. Looking at this truly objectively that just seems like the most likely thing, unfortunately. I truly hope that she went off and started a new life, however unlikely that is. Renner and his expert are full of crap. I have no clue who observer is. No Iam not Observer Iam citigil. I have always made it clear that I believe Maura met up with foul play on the night she disappeared as well as family members.I have never sent a letter to anyone concerning Mauras disappearance.Your IP adress depends on the server you have.
|
JWB
Portland, ME
|
gpj wrote: it was searched when it arrived at its new owners in lyme nh. the owner gave the permission to do so. i know the owner. it was gone through with a vacuum cleaner top to bottom . Interesting, that would mean that it was not to check the permit
|
JWB
Portland, ME
|
Jenkins wrote: <quoted text> I might be wrong but didn't renner say that it came from a geocities forum on Maura, which I've never seen. I may be wrong about this but I don't believe that post was in one of the original MM or MMM boards; I don't remember ever seeing it and I really don't believe that back then on those forums they would allow a post like that to be up for very long at all. All I remember reading was that it was a site dedicated to finding Maura Murray. I am not familiar with Geocities. Do they have forums that would fit that mold?
|
citigirl
Brockton, MA
|
Judged:
1
1
gpj wrote: it was searched when it arrived at its new owners in lyme nh. the owner gave the permission to do so. i know the owner. it was gone through with a vacuum cleaner top to bottom . Yes the new owner allowed the trailer to be searched. I knew the town began with an L. You are correct it was Lyme NH.
|
|