Maura Murray

Judged:

4

4

3

BobJenkins-OG wrote:

<quoted text>
Damn fakeLE, sounds like you really wanna know who I am.
So then what's up with this post you made a few months ago? Thought you already figured out who I was so Long ago it's not even funny. Lol

Judged:

1

1

1

whiston wrote:

Hi Shack and all thanks for the heads up the EMS call to Bunga Rd but coming from the log who knowsif there werer other calls.StiLl wondering how JKM knew RO and who else was living on Bunga rd at the time.

Judged:

1

1

1

Pointless Endeavor wrote:

It seems like it's been long forgotten that Beagle, aka A.O., revealed his own identity right here on Topix a few years ago in one of the Maura Murray threads. That's some fine detective work there, Jim-Bob.

Judged:

3

3

3

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
The other night while traveling on rt 112 I turned my headlights off for a very brief moment to get a feel for just how dark it is up this way and when I did,the first thing that came to mind was mauara would never have wandered off in this pitch dark. There are no city lights to illuminate the skies around here.

Judged:

2

1

1

whiston wrote:

Hi mcsmom and all ,as far as I can see on line RO's daughter was not killed until october of 2004.We were told JKM knew RO prior to Feb 09 2004 and that is why I am wondering about the 'oh its you comment'.There is a picture of what was left of the car on faceboobk.Christ how heart breaking.Who else lived on Bunga Rd that JKM could have known through his job.I could have sworn I read about an earlier than 7 pm ish call to Bunga rd for someone falling.When RO called about the red truck sighting was it still chief Williams running the P.R. show take care philip

Judged:

1

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
When it is pitch dark - you also have the ability to see the lights of incoming cars much sooner. It would make it easier to understand why no one saw her that night. She would have ample time to get off the road.

Judged:

2

2

1

dll wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi Lighthouse - One of the benefits of the North Country is minimal light polution. Yes lights from oncoming vehicles are easier to see at night. However on the evening of Feb 9 2004 it was not "pitch dark". Visibility was very good for both pedestrians & motor vehicle operators.

Judged:

3

3

3

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
You see, that is the difference between you and me, well one of MANY differences between us. Just because I know who you are still does not mean I am going to out YOU on a public forum.
Can you say the same thing? I know the answer of what YOU would do.
I suggest you familiarize yourself with some basic data storage programs. Accurint, TLO, ett. You may be surprised how easy it is to connect the dots.
This is the last I will post on this subject, I suggest you do the same.

dll wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi Just Me - IMHO the only way the scenio works is if you take out the comment about hitting the trees. Coming to rest in the EB lane next to them Yes, but not actually hitting them. If you look at the WMUR video @:18 it looks like they are trying to show the entire area of the accident. The sheered snowbank Mr Guy spoke about on the wB side and lower down on the EB side of 112 the tire tracks. As Maurachan said the video was taken 3 days after the accident. Tues & Wed were sunny and warm 35-36F, thur was a little cooler IIRC so the snow melt makes it harder to see the details. If the veh hit a patch of black ice coming around the corner the counter clockwise spin could have sent the front left corner into the snowbank in front of the Westmans home near the raised berm & pole. The berm could have kept the vehicle from hitting the pole.IIRC from Orko's photo, as it dips down, there's a stone wall or stones for a flower bed right there too. This could account for the direct impact damage LFQ & light.There might be scratching onlong the left dirvers side, hard to tell in the photos Looks like a couple dents on the drivers door below the window in the center. Scratches all along the front & rear bumpers. The snowbank mixed with road salt & sand could have caused that.
No disrespect to anyone here, but people keep making reference to the quantity of snow & really high snowbanks etc. There was very little snowfall in the beginning of 2004. When viewing the WMUR video, looking directly at the WB the pile in front is a combination of snow shed off the roof of the barn & plowing. The photo further down the road is at an odd angle at the bottom of a hill which is deceiving. Across the street would have been from plowing the driveway. As a native who drives in it, day in & day out (interstate, highways, class IV & V roads) the bigger the snowbank the better. In really bad freezing rain or blizzrd it helps to keep it between the ditches.
If anyone wants to know what the weather was try contacting Mark Breen from the Fairbanks Planitarium in St Johsnbury VT. http://www. fairbanksmuseum. org/ He's the local weather guru. Most of the statistics found online at the national weather center about our region come from him. He has weather observers scattered around the Northeast Kingdom & may even have or know of some in or around Haverhill.

Judged:

2

2

2

Just me--paris wrote:

To clarify. I do not see tire tracks, I do not see any "motion" of car, no "backing away", nothing. Just a still shot piece of the area ahead of where her car got stuck. PLEASE! If this tree is supposed to be THE TREE Maura hit, I'll eat my hat. Lucky for me, my hat is straw. But I hate straw anyway so I'll take my chances. It's a farce. There's no way unless it snowed HEAVILY and what "motion" the car would show in the snow there, MIGHT be covered.
But a car is so heavy! Did it just jump and land there? Probably not. Did it move? Yes, according to W's, the other neighbor and now citi confirms it.

Judged:

2

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Why does it matter how the car crashed? I'm not sure of any new information on the car crash that would alter the missing person case.

Judged:

4

3

3

Just me--paris wrote:

<quoted text>It matters because these are the details in a missing person case. It matters because PI's say there had to have been a "first" crash, that it could NOT have happened there. I say maybe it did happen there and she hit the pole or cement, or BERM? like dll calls it. That to me would explain the damage to the hood. That she hit it good and whipped around.

Judged:

4

4

3

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Next time just come out and say you are working on a conspiracy theory.