Maura Murray

Judged:

3

3

3

Bobjenkins-OG wrote:

<quoted text>
Haha, good question & I'm really not absolutely certain. Most likely I was at my old house in the Waterville estates in campton. I'd say 99% chance I was there.
At the time I had my house in campton and I had an apartment in downtown Burlington that I would stay at tues, wed & thurs. Generally I drove 112 like twice a week, Tuesday morning on the way to VT and either late thurs night or Friday morning on the way home.

Judged:

3

3

3

Emmett Dove wrote:

Jenkins - i dont got enuf words 2 quote ur whole thread..
So the whole Pic/mugshot was BS huh?
You never replied to my theory asking about the concrete, thats BS too huh?
You really know what "snitch papers" are?? You said her name was redatcted & looked weird.. So I too looked at it.. You really think that was BS too??
The whole red truck theory I askes about is Bs also huh??
The family with the driveway poured I asked you about was BS also??
Think about all the stuff I asked u & replied to b4 we argued & honestly say it was BS..
You ever stop to think I said that cus we were arguin?? Cus if it wasted ur nite it wasted mine also.. Think about that...

Judged:

3

3

3

SamIAM wrote:

<quoted text>
Doesn't sound like much of an alibi to me.

Judged:

2

2

2

SamIAM wrote:

Anyone can sue anyone for anything. Might not win, but the other side still has to defend it and that costs "munny". Some people might not care if they win and just go for the object lesson.

Judged:

3

3

3

Bobjenkins-OG wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes I replied to what you were saying but that hardly wasted my whole night, how long do you think it takes to make a post?
I actually had a great night chillin on the couch with my girl & my dog watching movies. We actually had a wicked good time that night.
Taking like 30 mins total to reply to some posts is a long shot from wasting my whole night.
Yes I know what snitch papers are and what they look like or should look like. It took about 15 seconds to look at those and know they were a standard arrest report.
I was questioning the legitimacy of that top page that had her sentence listed & her name redacted. Thought it looked weird bc I've never heard of any sentence like that and why her name would be redacted from it, still think it looks weird but I'm assuming it is legit at this point.
Now you said you thought they looked like snitch papers, even though you knew that they weren't. You also you were laughing thinking me and Amy were wasting our night by voraciously studying the papers to determine if they were snitch papers.
That is the definition of a troll, someone who says something they know isn't true just to get a response and waste people's time. The whole time you were saying that I kept thinkin 'those are not snitch papers and if this kid thinks they are he has no clue what snitch papers look like.'
So ok, maybe everything you said wasn't BS but you were, and clearly have been trolling the shit out of this thread. Seems like some of the weirdos are more than happy to have you here being a troll too, it's an easy and good distraction from the true topic at hand. They like things that divert attention from the topic and you've been providing a great distraction.
You may have been arguing with me but you still admitted that you knew they weren't snitch papers when you said it. You also admitted that you were laughing thinkin we were wasting our night. That is trolling by any definition of the word.

Judged:

3

3

3

Bobjenkins-OG wrote:

<quoted text>....I answered, now the question becomes where were YOU Sammy boy(or girl)???

Judged:

2

2

2

Bobjenkins-OG wrote:

<quoted text>
Ya that's true, anyone can file a lawsuit that'll get thrown out of court by a judge.
Judges throw out frivolous lawsuits all the time and that doesn't cost $ btw.
Anyone can file a lawsuit for any reason they want but that doesn't mean it actually makes it into a courtroom to be defended.
And besides, Emmett clearly said he would "take her house" or something ridiculous like that. Trust me, nobodies losing their home over some posts in topix lol.

Judged:

3

3

3

Emmett Dove wrote:

<quoted text>
Go back & look near the end of Feb, first week of March.. Its one of the reasons I stopped posting.. I promise you its there.. When u hve extra time check it out..
Its back when we were both posting & talkin at the same time.. Im quite sure it was end of feb first week of march, could be middle of feb..
& the words were more like "two hoodlums on a witch hunt" same thing different wordin..

Judged:

3

3

3

SamIAM wrote:

<quoted text>
"Record Jury Verdict for Online Defamation in Texas
Friday, April 27th, 2012
Jurors in Texas have handed a $13.8 million libel verdict to a married couple defamed on Topix."
-- find it at ... bloglaw blog.com/blog/... --
Huh.

Judged:

3

3

3

SamIAM wrote:

<quoted text>
Huh. Let's see ... in this post, you told us 2 times that you had a great night that night (1 time would have been enuff). Told us 2 times you didn't waste your night (1 time would have been enuff). Told us 2 times ED admitted they weren't snitch papers (1 time would have been enuff). You've been told several times that your posts are redundant and that it wastes the time of others trying to wade thru them, but you keep on doing it.
What does that make you? Spammer much?

Judged:

1

1

1

SamIAM wrote:

<quoted text>
Not even in that state or any of the ones next to it. And I can prove it. Probably unlike you who were within a stone's throw and only some girlfriend for an alibi (that's like a wife, who believes the other half when it comes to alibis? nobody, that's who).
Gotta wonder what the agenda is of some guy who comes on here and takes over the forum with blather, confrontation and so on. Especially some guy who shows off by talking about all the times he's been up and down 112.

Judged:

1

1

1

SamIAM wrote:

<quoted text>
"Record Jury Verdict for Online Defamation in Texas
Friday, April 27th, 2012
Jurors in Texas have handed a $13.8 million libel verdict to a married couple defamed on Topix."
-- find it at ... bloglaw blog.com/blog/... --
Huh.

Judged:

1

1

1

FrmLE wrote:

Jenkins has totally ruined any interest I may have had in this forum.
I literally cringe at the endless long rambling posts that repeat the same thing over and over and over and over. Same points, same ridiculous premises, same theories based on non-truths and same spin to satisfy his position.
I honestly don't know what is worse, jenkins on topic or the endless political ads that spew the same crap.
It's a toss up.
Good luck to you all, I wish you the best on the jerky jenkins forum.

Judged:

2

2

2

Bobjenkins-OG wrote:

<quoted text> ...And I'm sorry I am not confrontational...

Bobjenkins-OG wrote:

<quoted text> ...These weirdos love this shit, they love making the thread about me, or shack, or anything/anyone else that can divert attention away from the matter at hand.

Judged:

1

1

1

Bobjenkins-OG wrote:

<quoted text>
Really?!? You mean it??? That's awesome
No fun trying to spread disinformation when there's someone who can logically show it's bullshit huh?
Getting called out on your lies kills it for you huh?
No fun when someone clearly and logically shows that there's no way in fkn hell you have inside info on the case? Makes sense
That's perfect. You, and a select few others, are specifically the reason I started posting again early this year. I read your crap and couldn't believe some of the shit you were trying to pass off as fact. If you actually stopped posting then IMO I've done what I set out to do. I have no problem w you posting, it's the spreading of misinformation that I just won't stand for.
And besides, when were your posts not the same basic shit repeated over n over, lies, misinformation and spin to support your ridiculous theory?
You do realize that about 90% of the crap you wrote was pretty much the exact opposite of everything thats been said on record by the real LE investigators who worked this case and spoke on record about it right? It also contradicted what was said by witnesses and the small amount of evidence associated with the case. Your a smart guy, you must know that.
Just makes me wonder: were you saying that shit just because of your ego? Your know it all,'I'm smarter than everyone else' mentality or were you deliberately trying to spread misinformation about this case?? Hard to say IMO, I'm really not sure.
Either way dude, good riddance. Now if we can just get a few more of these weirdos to stop spreading bullshit as fact then maybe i can stop posting so much..
That's why I just laugh to myself every time one of these weirdos accuses me of making shit up. Everything I say either comes directly from a quote or witness statement, or I say it's my opinion. Obviously I make a mistake here and there but I'm ALWAYS being honest, That's a whole lot more then some of you can say for yourselves.
I'm making it up because I said 'some guy' instead of 'someone'....really wowzer??? Yea, you were being REAL honest on that one lol.
Say whatever you guys want about me, I couldn't care less. I really don't care what a bunch of weirdos who aren't honest say about me, obviously. I could give a shit. I could have a giant pile of shit here and I literally wouldn't even give you one shit for your opinions. LOL
For some reason I don't think your actually going anywhere fakeLE, I feel like I've heard this before from many different posters, seems like whenever someone announces they're done they always come back; there's a few posters on this thread currently that definitely said they were done posting but they're still here.