Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
As much as Jenky drives me nuts I'd hate to see him or anyone here harmed. I hope he rethinks meeting this stranger to go hiking or brings a large group of friends along with him.

Judged:

1

Just me--paris wrote:

Now, if this were the case and friends, staff at WP or UMASS told police about the full extent of her intentions,(JUST AN EXAMPLE) they would be double crossed by the protection afforded by the courts to remain annonamous.
..........
The courts couldn't very well let this happen, or could they? Amy? SS? Could this be a possibility?

Judged:

1

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi Paris. I'm sorry but I'm not sure if I understand what you're asking. Privacy of witnesses and those who gave statements was a concern, according to Landry and Strelzin's testimony on April 13, 2007. Is that what you mean?

Judged:

1

1

Just me--paris wrote:

<quoted text>Yes, you understood me. As simple as it sounds, it could be that that a prosecution may be impending against MM rather than a POI who caused bodily harm, and that's what I was supposing. Sorry, I have alot on my mind....

Judged:

1

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
I reread through the transcript today to answer a question for Bill. I don't see anything indicating that MM might be prosecuted for anything.
Protecting witness statements was a concern though. And of course they want to be able to prosecute a POI at a later time, should it become clear in the future that Maura was murdered.
To address this 75% thing:
Strelzin's 75% estimate was regarding this:
“I could give the judge a percentage based on my experience, generally, in criminal investigations, a prosecution on this case, I could give a percentage of what I think that likelihood is, but I
acknowledge that there’s also a likelihood that this could simply be a missing person’s case that doesn’t have criminal overtones”
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7_atAFvowRhM...
So, I agree with Bill. It's a general estimate based on his work in general with similar types of cases and has nothing to do with any evidence that Maura was killed.

Judged:

2

1

1

BobJenkins-OG wrote:

101 pages of websleuths, that's interesting for sure. Almost unbelievable.
What's interesting are the pages they have, reportedly they have the pages when these people like bill were still on WS before they got banned. They chose the pages that has people belligerently arguing the 'lost in the woods theory.
Hard to sat what that means but it sure is interesting.

Judged:

1

BobJenkins-OG wrote:

101 pages of websleuths, that's interesting for sure. Almost unbelievable.
What's interesting are the pages they have, reportedly they have the pages when these people like bill were still on WS before they got banned. They chose the pages that has people belligerently arguing the 'lost in the woods theory.
Hard to sat what that means but it sure is interesting.

Judged:

3

3

2

Nhlover wrote:

I would also like to know where the duck tape was found to see if it was in the area of where the cell phone was found.

Judged:

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh no! I'm in the MM files on webslothes as....a....a....dissenter. OH MY GOD!
You could rephrase that to state that morons on webslothes were arguing belligerently and with no evidence of murder, rape, mayhem, police corruption, police inaction, conspiracy, oh god the conspiracies, bigfoot abduction, ufo abduction, burials in cellars, burials in ice covered ponds, and many more I am sure I haven't read since I left that site to the brain trust that resides there. I am sure they will have that case figured out anytime now. And to be clear, I was not banned. Find the threads, they should be there. I mean, if I really wanted to be there, how hard do you think it is to get back in. Look at the posters, does it it look like a Mensa convention to you?
Bill

Judged:

1

Nhlover wrote:

<quoted text>
Hi Citigirl-let me explain the cell phone. I was hiking around the woods with my friend on an old road on rte 25 pike area, we found a phone in the water. He picked it up and brought it to the car with us. He took the battery out to see if it might work in his phone. The thinking at this point had nothing to do with anyone missing or anything unusual in our minds, as the Maura Murray case was not in my forethought, I had only moved back to that area about one year before and was not "up" on the case. I did know about it but didn't know the actual location.
At that time I said why do you want that thing, it's old it's not going to work, its been wet, etc. He tossed it out the door. I know it sounds crazy now, but truely at that point, I did not think anything of it.
2 days later it came over me like a ton of bricks. Some how I put it togather and I realized the area was so close to the accident.(close in NH small town road terms). I had something to do that next day but all I could think of was that phone, so the next day I drove back up there, alone, and looked all around for it. It had snowed lightly and I just couldn't find it. I had such creepy feelings, as though, someone was around or knew where the area was, because I had asked about it on a site to see if her phone was ever missing or found. I believe it was that one writers site that has been doing all the investigating. When I posted about it, they seemed so unenthused. I had sent an email to an address he/they referred me too, but never heard anything else. I will look back and see if I can find any of the info of whom it was sent to. This case always bothers me because I've lived up there and heard so many stories from the natives about what they think happened and all. From a lesbian cop picked her up to a guy that lives in Pike and travels all the back roads when he hears calls over the police scanner.
If you have anything else, I will check back...

Judged:

1

OKAY wrote:

<quoted text>
Fishy, but if he keeps Jenky busy by taking him on a hike, it would be a very good thing.
Rehashing and making things up keeps this whole thread going.

Judged:

2

2

1

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
Not to mention the community service they would do by picking up roadside trash. After all any beer bottle or candy wrap could be related to MM or her killer.

Judged:

1

Orko Kringer wrote:

Here is a list of documents/items that police investigators had in their custody but did decide not to prevent Fred or the public from getting a hold of supposedly
Take special note to the atm video mention (odd) I didn’t know that was up for grabs to the public or are have they just released the request form for said video?
1. Grafton County Sherriff’s Department Incident Log
2. N.H. Uniform Police Traffic Accident Report
3. E-911 Subpoena (not grand jury)
4. Cellular Records of Fred Murray
5. Woodsville Ambulance Response Roster
6. Newspaper Articles
7. Investigation Report and Documents re:National Center for Missing Children and Missing Posters of Maura
8. Mass Motor Vehicle Crash Report
9. Written Statement by Fred Murray
10. Subpoena Fleet ATM Video from 2/9/2004
11. Subpoena to UMASS re: Financial records for Maura
12. FOIA Request and Response
13. Email re: FOIA Request
14. Investigation Report FOIA Request to Grafton Sherriff with copy of reply and documents produced
15. Filing of Notice of Appeal

Judged:

1

hannah_b wrote:

<quoted text>
OMG, BIll, police is coming after you for being a heretic to the MM cult! Just as bad as depicting Mohammed as a dog!