Maura Murray

Bobby, Bobby, Bobby,

Poor showing. This is one of your worse unsubstantiated posts yet. Are you really a fed? You need to bone up on the law pronto before you become a liability to your job!
There has never been one single case in the state of NH. where a judge has refused an exparte hearing for an order of protection. Never! The cops would laugh you out of the station should you request one based on the JWB situation?! Really, because my interpretation of the law, as it is written is this; Although the police can advise you to seek an order, and often they do, they cannot deny you that request. ONLY a judge can and in order to do so, he HAS to grant you an emergency ex parte hearing. It is the law Bob, for once, do some research!

I spoke with a friend of mine who is a detective here on the police force concerning this issue. He in turn called the AG's office. I was informed that NUMEROUS other posters had called concerning this particular situation with their concerns and the entire thread has been reviewed. Indeed, as Amy, say's, I didn't help the situation, it's an issue for law enforcement and the concerned party should seek an order. Not only, was I advised that there was enough there to get one, but that she should seek one.
If you are in NH Bob, I suggest a trip to the supreme court law library on Hazen drive in Concord. It's a great resource and it's like a ghost town. Most law firms have their own library so you will have plenty of space to do your research. Mary, the clerk, who has been there forever knows more law than most lawyers and is very helpful.
Ever have a male friend with kids whose wife has filed for divorce Bob? How did that go down? Unfortunately, it has become almost par for the course for attorneys to advise a woman to seek a protection order as the first step in a divorce filing. Gives her immediate possesion of the property and custody of the children. Doesn't matter whether Pops has ever been a threat to anyone in his life. A complete unfairly, unbalanced uphill battle for the old man from this point forward. Judges grant them in a majority of these cases even if there has been no domestic issues in the past. PRECEDENT has been set and judges just hate to go against precedent! Listen Bob; I'm not making this up. There are attorneys who not only advertise for defense of these orders they specialize in them. Tons of sites explaining this and law firms right at your finger tips. In Mass.? Type in Hessian law offices and do a little reading. You can go to the state web site wherever you are and download cases that set precedent as they happened!

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
I did a quick search back to 10/1/12, and found that Elphalblablabla has made 13 posts on this forum during that time, 3 of them in the last 24 hours. The first was on 10/23,#27506, where he/she/it (since I don't the gender, I'll call it "Bla") said: <quoted text>
Apparently, Bla hadn't posted in quite a while, and this was Bla's first contribution in a long time - not a post about Maura, just a slam against posters here.
Out of the 10 posts Bla made prior to #29904 (first quote at the top of this post), four were to slam me, one to slam Lighthouse, one to slam Wowzer, and one to slam Emmett Dove. Including #29904 and the two posts following, Bla slammed me twice again, Wowzer twice, Ridiculous three times and Snowy twice.
From the first post slamming me, I realized Bla was simply there to bully me, so I have ignored all Bla's posts until now.
Edited due to space:
To Lighthouse,#26279
<quoted text>
To me,#26394:
<quoted text>
To Wowzer and me,#27636:
<quoted text>
To Emmett,#28809, who was upset about having to remove his manger scene from his front yard at Christmas, and how Emmett felt it ruined Christmas for him and his daughter:
<quoted text>
Nice Christmas message, I'm sure it made Emmett's Christmas that much more special.
Bla needs to take a good look in the mirror - the majority of Bla's recent posts are not about Maura and are just to bully many members of the forum. Bla needs to put that life skill about ignoring others to work and realize that he/she/it belongs on the bully side of the aisle.

Good Post.

Last thing Bob and then I need to go milk the cows.
This isn't about outing someone on the internet. It's about posing a threat to someone in the real world. Based on your boys bizarre and erratic behavior, and the fact that he brought it into the real world by actively seeking her identity and going so far as to contact an alleged work mate, red flags indeed did go off and it's likely that your boy will be contacted regardless of Wowzers decision concerning an order of protection.

Emmett Dove wrote:

I just wished we had some of her friends that knew her that would talk some..
loneliness of the long distance runner -(in NO way, shape or form an insult)
We know she was sorta shy, had her own personal demons as anyone else, in the HS pix Ive seen used she seems much taller than everyone else (get into that in a minute), loved hiking & camping, from a small town, etc; Maybe she seen running as a way out? Maybe she matured or grew quicker than her friends & it made her feel uncomfortable? Maybe once she got a lil older & went to college then to another one, maybe she was getting over being shy? Maybe she was just trying to live life in a way she wasnt used to? I think maybe it caught up with her to quick..
Factors like : College Athlete = a VERY hard strain (Been there)
Long distance relationship = ive heard very very hard, especially a 21yr old
Legal probs + A hard school = A breaking point for many people
Maybe she had a "nervous breakdown" as in "the telephone call"??...
The rest im not sure on & dont really like to speculate..
Maybe she was like - "The loneliness of the long distance runner"...

Just quoted this to say that with people saying "there was nothing about Maura last night, I posted this last night but got no response.. Now, I know plenty of people know this lil common knowledge that I posted, But the ones saying no one thought of her must have skimmed my post.. Its at the top of the previous page, 1'st post on the page..

& for those that dont know, "The Loneliness of the Long Distance Runner" is a short story by Alan Sillitoe from the late 50's & made into a movie in the early 60's & is a term quite used in philosopy & pop culture in college..

as i said, Ridiculous, this individual has, by his own admission, been seeking the identity and photo of another poster...me. it is documented and has been copied from this thread, and a report was made to the authorities when the behavior took place.
Wowzer is not the first, and the pattern of behavior is evident.

Jenkins wrote:

The most ironic part of it all is that these people then accuse others, who are clearly just frustrated from dealing with the nastiest posters on the internet, of having mental issues.

I don't know Jenkins - to me it takes a special person to create a moniker "Major Do Do" have a picture of steaming pile of crap. To sign in on that username on the forum of a missing girl does seem rather odd to me. Am I to believe Bill made them do this? You don't think that might seem a little off? Are you really going to defend a poster by their own admission is stating they are a pile of $$$$.

Am I to believe that posters can change the character of another individual by not letting them get their point clearly accross.

It's all about the poster here now..........NOT MAURA. SHE IS BEING FORGOTTEN.

This forum is closed for serious clean up. Will reopen when posters come to their senses and start talking about Maura again.

Tang Zoi wrote:

It's all about the poster here now..........NOT MAURA. SHE IS BEING FORGOTTEN.

false statement.
is there something important about Maura you wish to discuss?
have at it. no one is stopping you.

just from a practical point of view, it's difficult to sustain an online conversation for nearly 9 years, 24/7/365, without lapses and dry spots

jenky, just so you know, derogatory name-calling, specifically, "epic bitch", is offensive.

the spot on reference to being raised by a pack of wolves and being thrown over to Topix because you are so annoying...and i'll add rude and coarse in your use of language...was made after repeated attempts to teach you some manners.

now, will you call Bill an epic bitch when you argue or disagree with him?
or do you reserve the term for strong-minded women?

no answer is required...the question is rhetorical.
i noticed. and think even less of you than i did before.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
false statement.
is there something important about Maura you wish to discuss?
have at it. no one is stopping you.
just from a practical point of view, it's difficult to sustain an online conversation for nearly 9 years, 24/7/365, without lapses and dry spots

Bullcrap.....If there is nothing to discuss....then why do You come here? Just to argue with people?

Maura is being forgotten no matter what You say..!

I'll come back in 6 months and guaranteed You'll all still be arguing about the same things. And none of it will be about Maura Murray who disappeared on feb. 9th 2004 on Rte. 112 in Haverhill NH.

You "HAVE AT IT" You do it best. Agenda.

Bye Bye Birdies

Tang,

Why not respond to Emmettet's post concerning Maura? Not only did he make the post, but he kindly reminded anyone interested in discussing Her of his Post. In fact, there were quite a few posts concerning Maura made yesterday. Again I have to ask; Hypocrite much? Although you posts concerning your travel and meal schedule were quite entertaining, as well as your games egging JWB on. I really didn't glean much from it as far as Maura Murray is concerned. Book cover photo's, letting us know how easy we all were to manipulate, and particularly for me the subtle references to literature were great, but, where was Maura in all of this? I guess I have to plead the " dull tool" again. I guess I just missed all of the new info you brought to the table. Sorry.

No need for police here on topix. What´s needed is a nanny.

Ridiculous wrote:

I spoke with a friend of mine who is a detective here on the police force concerning this issue. He in turn called the AG's office. I was informed that NUMEROUS other posters had called concerning this particular situation with their concerns and the entire thread has been reviewed. Indeed, as Amy, say's, I didn't help the situation, it's an issue for law enforcement

LOL, wow, have you yourself actually looked up any of these laws or are you just totally taling out your ass? Cuz it sure looks like you are.
First of all what you're talkig about with the women filing a restraining order as a first step in a divorce is a complete and total abuse of the restraining order system and a horrrible thing to do. I'm not that old but I have known a few people who've been divorced and none of them filed restraining orders.
What you're saying about women filing protective orders aainst a man who's never done anyhting violent in their life is a disgusting and sick use of law. And in order for her to obtain said order she would have to commit perjury. You can't just get a restraining order because you ask for one, there are certain requirements that must be met and if a woman is willing to lie and say that her husband is threatening her or touched her in any way than that woman is truly sick in the head and probably shouldn't have custody of her kids, IMO. I can't believe this actually happens in our society.
I have known a few girls in my life who actually needed restraining orders against crazy ex bf's and abusing the system with frivolous restraining orders really pisses me off.
Also I am well aware of the fact that the person, not the police files the restraining order. But your post the other night, I believe it was yours and if not I apologize, said something along the lines of a judge being woken up in the middle of the night if JWB posted wowzer's info. Only a cop can call and have a judge woken up and trust me, they aint doing that unless it's a real emergency. I've known a girl who's ex was threatening to burn her house down in the middle of the night with her and her roomates in it and the cops still weren't calling any judge for a restraining oorder. They didn't do shit, they told her that if she sees him near her house to call 911 and if she wants she can file a restraining order on monday.
So the suggestion that a judge would be woken up over anything being said on topix is completley insane, total crazy talk, not gonna happen, never gonna happen.
Honestly, I don't believe for a second that you actually called any LE regarding this matter and that they siad numerous other people have and that she should file for an order, I don't believe that at all, I think you're making the whole thing up. Which agency did you call? HPD? NHSP? If any cop said that she should file for an order, they clearly do not know the law. Remember, just because you give some idiot a badge and a gun does not mean they now automatically know the laws. Ask any defense attorney, the sad fact is most cops DON'T know the laws they've sworn to uphold.
In my next post I'm gonna post the law directly from the nh.gov website about 'stalking protection orders' and what the requirement is to get one.

here are the requirements that need to be met in order for a stalking protective order to be issued in the state off NH, this is pulled directly from the NH.gov weebste on the matter.
The person needs to commit TWO OR MORE of these things in order for an order to be issued:

"a. Threatening the safety of the targeted person or an immediate family member;
b. Following, approaching, or confronting that person, or a member of that person's immediate family;
c. Appearing in close proximity to, or entering the person's residence, place of employment, school, or other place where the person can be found, or the residence, place of employment or school of a member of that person's immediate family;
d. Causing damage to the person's residence or property or that of a member of the person's immediate family;
e. Placing an object on the person's property, either directly or through a third person, or that of an immediate family member;
f. Causing injury to that person's pet, or a pet belonging to a member of that person's immediate family; and
g. Engaging in any act of communication, as defined in RSA 644:4, II (“impart[ing] a message by any method of transmission, including but not limited to telephoning or personally delivering or sending or having delivered any information or material by written or printed note or letter"

TWO OR MORE, JWB did NONE of these. He hasn't threatened wowzer in any way shape or form, he threatened to post her name online, that is NOT a threat of imminent danger, that is not him threatening to go to her house or anything like that.
This is why I don't believe for a second that you, or anyone for that matter, actually called LE regarding this. And if you did, the cop you spoke to was a complete moron who clearly has no idea whay the laws are; either that or you lied and exagerated the situation. which I can see happenin, your crew of trolls on this thread are prone to exagerations and all out lies.

So I think that makes it pretty clear that there will be no restraining order issued against JWB, even if he does post wowzers info online, which is a perfectly legal thing to do. I don't think it's the right thing to do but he woul not be breakig any law by doing it.
If the law can't do anything to Beagle after he posted a video of Renner's child that was somewhat threateing, and certainly disturbing, then there is no way in hell the llaw can do anything about JWB posting wowzer's info on this thread.

The above poster got it right, this thread don't need no LE, it needs a babysitter, you guys act like a bunch of five year olds.''Im gonna go tell mommy on you''''JWB is saying he might reveal my secret identity and that i can't be a super troll anymore''''waa waa waa''

Seriously, you people need to get a grip on reality here. And I absolutely love how it's the craziest ones among us that are constantly accusing others of being crazy or having substance abuse issues, as if you could posibly know that bc someone is just completel frustrated by the behavior of these people on ths site. The same people that lie and make assumptions constantly that are always accusing others of doing it. The same people that constantly are crying that the thread is a complete waste of time and just windmilling that are here every single day for years. The childish behavior is just insane and the level of hypocrisy is just through the roof.

Ridiculous wrote:

I spoke with a friend of mine who is a detective here on the police force concerning this issue. He in turn called the AG's office. I was informed that NUMEROUS other posters had called concerning this particular situation with their concerns and the entire thread has been reviewed. Indeed, as Amy, say's, I didn't help the situation, it's an issue for law enforcement and the concerned party should seek an order. Not only, was I advised that there was enough there to get one, but that she should seek one.
If you are in NH Bob, I suggest a trip to the supreme court law library on Hazen drive in Concord. It's a great resource and it's like a ghost town. Most law firms have their own library so you will have plenty of space to do your research. Mary, the clerk, who has been there forever knows more law than most lawyers and is very helpful.
Ever have a male friend with kids whose wife has filed for divorce Bob? How did that go down? Unfortunately, it has become almost par for the course for attorneys to advise a woman to seek a protection order as the first step in a divorce filing. Gives her immediate possesion of the property and custody of the children. Doesn't matter whether Pops has ever been a threat to anyone in his life. A complete unfairly, unbalanced uphill battle for the old man from this point forward. Judges grant them in a majority of these cases even if there has been no domestic issues in the past. PRECEDENT has been set and judges just hate to go against precedent! Listen Bob; I'm not making this up. There are attorneys who not only advertise for defense of these orders they specialize in them. Tons of sites explaining this and law firms right at your finger tips. In Mass.? Type in Hessian law offices and do a little reading. You can go to the state web site wherever you are and download cases that set precedent as they happened!

Completely accurate post.

Snowy wrote:

jenky, just so you know, derogatory name-calling, specifically, "epic bitch", is offensive.
the spot on reference to being raised by a pack of wolves and being thrown over to Topix because you are so annoying...and i'll add rude and coarse in your use of language...was made after repeated attempts to teach you some manners.
now, will you call Bill an epic bitch when you argue or disagree with him?
or do you reserve the term for strong-minded women?
no answer is required...the question is rhetorical.
i noticed. and think even less of you than i did before.

LOL, you're a real pice of work. I called you an epic bitch because that's what you are.
Anyone who knows me knows that I'm not sexist in any way, in fact the majority of my good friends are actually girls and I rrespect women.

I wouldn't call Bill an epic bitch bc bill is a man, these are sex-orientated words. I'd call him a total dick, bc that's what he is. See what I'm sayin? I didn't choose these words as insults, society did.
And I have zero respect for you snowy, you are a bad person, plain and simple. You lie, you're a troll, and you throw out insults like they're an integral part of your behavior. Your behavior on this thread is simply appalling, I can only imagine what kind of person you must be in real life.

ANd I gotta ask, is that picture on the other blo where youur name is posted really you? Or is it just one of your sasquatch relatives? I'm dyig to know.
And for the record, I am glad that you think less of me. I don't want a person like you to think highly of me, that would mean I'm doing something seriously wrong in life. So thank you, that makes me feel better

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL, you're a real pice of work. I called you an epic bitch because that's what you are.
Anyone who knows me knows that I'm not sexist in any way, in fact the majority of my good friends are actually girls and I rrespect women.
I wouldn't call Bill an epic bitch bc bill is a man, these are sex-orientated words. I'd call him a total dick, bc that's what he is. See what I'm sayin? I didn't choose these words as insults, society did.

You see, that is one of the many differences between us. I wouldn't hesitate for a second to suggest you take several Midols for your cramps (which seems to occur daily for you), even though you are reportedly a man. Nor would I hesitate for a second to refer to you as a twonker, and I do suspect you come from a long line of twonkers.

Not back but, he leaves so many openings, I can't be expected to ignore them all.

Bill