Maura Murray

Judged:

2

2

2

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Good idea. Shall we re-examine the issue of the rag in the tailpipe or the red truck? Looks like Renner may be posting some news tomorrow.

Judged:

4

4

3

Jenkins wrote:

As for cyber bullying, it's blatantly obvious that bill, snowy, wowzer and Co are the bullies on this thread.
Anyone who doesn't agree either hasn't read back on the thread or is just not being honest plain and simple.
After a few years off from posting I started posting again last year right around this time. Very few of the posters were around back when I was posting on the MMM.com site, and the ones that were claim they don't remember me. So they had no idea who i was, to them I was new poster. Literally after my second or third post I was being personally attacked by these people, being called every name in the book and then some that aren't even in the book yet. I was shocked and appalled by the behavior exhibited by these people.
Some of the peeople on this thread are the rudest, meanest and just downright nastiest posters i've ever witnessed on any forum anwhere online, even moreso than the political foruums, it's crazy; i've never seen anything like it. The craziest part about it is the topic, this is a forum about a young innocent girl who is missing and most likely got murdered and this is the topic that these people choose to troll on and make it into their own personal forum to attack people.
We are dealing with some seriously weird people that clearly have issues. No normal people would ever talk to people like that, especially on a forum with a topic that this forum has. The most ironic part of it all is that these people then accuse others, who are clearly just frustrated from dealing with the nastiest posters on the internet, of having mental issues. Everybody in their life has known someone who is just a liar; ever notice that someone who is a straight up liar is always accusing everyone else of lying? This is exactly what is going on here, except it's not lying, it's someting different.
In addition to being the rudest and nastiest posters I've ever seen, they're also the biggest hypocrites I've ever seen. I'vejust never seen anything like it before, they're aways attacking someone for something they themseves do on a regular basis, like basig a theory on an assumption.
All these people do is make assumptions, they have absolutely no facts to back up their theory so the only thing they can do is throw personal attacks.
They behave like 5 year olds in many ways, they can't win a debate, they know their wrong, they just call the person stupid.
Please go back and read the older posts and maybe you'll understand why some people like JWB are just frustrated with their behavior and are fighting back.
Go read the thread about Patric if you wanna see what a great guy Bill is, and how childish and insecure he really is. He can not answer the question of how dirt could end up in the OPEN eyes of a child who died of hypothermia. Instead of admiting maybe he's wrong, maybe there should be some more investigating, he throws out every nasy insult there is
Some of these people should really look at themselves and think about what kind of people they want to be in life, because someone who is willing to come on threads about topics like these jus to throw out personal attacks and try to insult people, and just act this rude and nasty, just can't be a very good person in real life.. Nice, normal people would never exhibit behavior like they show on this thread.
It is truly a sight to behold,these people gotta b some of the rudest people in new england, which places them high in the running for rudest worldwide. Makes me sick

Judged:

2

2

2

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
Well- although the rag in the tailpipe is an enigma I have always looked at it as much of Nothing. I don't see it as a means to stall a car.What are your thoughts on that Amy? I tried the rag in the muffler and it pops out in a nano second.

Judged:

2

2

2

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
I wonder what Renner might be posting Tomorrow. Any ideas?

Judged:

2

2

2

AppointedNH wrote:

Why does everyone, including FM dismiss that MM may be in the woods? No extensive searching has been done and dismissing the walking into the woods theory stunts any interest. Theres many public roads and lands in the direction east of the accident. Yet to date nobody has found her or any sign of her? Just a catalyst...

Judged:

2

1

1

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh yeah, you mentioned you tried it. Interesting. You're probably right, that it means nothing. But if she was intoxicated and running from the cops it is strange that she would take time to put the rag in the tailpipe, IMHO.
One thing I have never seen discussed is whether Maura had ever stayed at the Kinsman lodge or hiked the Kinsman mountain. I think it would be interesting to know if that was her destination. How far is that from where CW saw the person he thought might have been Maura?

Judged:

2

2

2

AppointedNH wrote:

Why does everyone, including FM dismiss that MM may be in the woods? No extensive searching has been done and dismissing the walking into the woods theory stunts any interest. Theres many public roads and lands in the direction east of the accident. Yet to date nobody has found her or any sign of her? Just a catalyst...

Judged:

4

3

3

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>Well- although the rag in the tailpipe is an enigma I have always looked at it as much of Nothing. I don't see it as a means to stall a car.What are your thoughts on that Amy? I tried the rag in the muffler and it pops out in a nano second.

Judged:

3

2

2

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Amy,
why do you think Kinsman might be important?

Judged:

2

2

2

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
She just may be in the woods but there were no footprints found to indicate anyone entered the woods.
The woods east on 112 are really thick and not really walked through by hikers or hunters from what I understand. Hunting and hiking mostly takes place 7 plus miles east of the site.
Odds are if she walked West on 112 she would have been spotted because LE and first responders came from that direction. That is just my take on it.

Judged:

4

3

2

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
I have alway believed that Maura put the rag in the tailpipe because she perceived that it would inhibit the car from starting up and that would prevent joyriders from stealing the car before she could get back later that evening.

Judged:

3

3

2

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh yeah, you mentioned you tried it. Interesting. You're probably right, that it means nothing. But if she was intoxicated and running from the cops it is strange that she would take time to put the rag in the tailpipe, IMHO.
One thing I have never seen discussed is whether Maura had ever stayed at the Kinsman lodge or hiked the Kinsman mountain. I think it would be interesting to know if that was her destination. How far is that from where CW saw the person he thought might have been Maura?

Judged:

3

3

2

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Which direction is the sandpit that the hair&duct tape were found?

Judged:

4

3

3

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>Which direction is the sandpit that the hair&duct tape were found?

Judged:

4

4

4

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
I have alway believed that Maura put the rag in the tailpipe because she perceived that it would inhibit the car from starting up and that would prevent joyriders from stealing the car before she could get back later that evening.

Judged:

4

4

3

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>Do you think Maura caught a ride, or that she was the person CW saw running? I think it could go either way, just wondering your take on it.

Judged:

3

2

2

findmaura wrote:

<quoted text>
Jenkins,
This is a perfect summation of this board.Thank you for speaking for myself&possibly many others that cant express with such eloquence.You hit the nail on the head dude.Its a shame, there are people here that would be interested in discussing Maura,but we cant.

Judged:

3

2

2

Frostman wrote:

<quoted text>
Matthew's post is on the Amherst forum -- he said it was in a field at a lay-by where hunters park to go into the woods ~ 6.7 miles (IIRC) from WB corner -- southeast.