Maura Murray

there's only been one official troll here that i'm aware of - B Christy couldn't shake him off for some time.
otherwise, some of the regular accusers are, themselves, guilty of being Ps in the As.
i cross sevl bridges every day, but deny being Jenky's pet troll. that's just "weird".:)

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
i am just stunned that someone would think evidence of drinking and driving would not matter specific to a missing person and a car crash.

Looking at those who don't think that would be important or significant says volumes about how useful they would be in an "investigation". For some, they think feeling is enough, others just don't have any kind of a clue what they are doing.

Bill

justamessenger wrote:

<quoted text>
Urban Dictionary: scoundrelish - an unscrupulous condiment suitable for adorning a Coney Island hot dog. Never tasteless.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/28/dining/afte...

Well done....I've only tried this particular condiment on open faced cashmere sandwiches.
I wonder if you could put together a limerick concerning this subject?

shall we move on to Tiffany now? or Scully & Scully? delightful!

oh, the arrogance around telling others how/when/where to make charitable donations.
no lecturws needed on social services and the homeless from the person that doesn't cry ("trust her", she said).

trollsRus wrote:

JR’s message to trollsRus:
"Dear Trolls,
I have decided to accept your crazy musings with a more open mind. While I don't agree with you, I respect your passion. We all want this case solved. I'm going at it my way. You're going at it your way. Great. I am working on gathering more evidence we can share and interpret in our different ways. In the end, I will present a book to you. A book that is a sequence of events and a tale of how some evidence was uncovered. You may be surprised in the end to find the book does not present much in the way of theory. It's a tragedy. About a girl who was as human as any one of us. And who got lost and hasn't been found. Here's hoping we get some answers this year. Peace.”

TrollsRUs, I was a bit confused about the above post. I at first thought you were JR, but since you said "Well said" in your first post, decided to look around. I then saw that JR posted the response above as a new blog entry today, titled as above to "Dear Trolls." I see that he also posted the same entry on the Maura Murray Missing Group page, after Helena Murray copied my "troll" post there. Interestingly, he dropped the "Dear Trolls" there and changed the intro to "Good morning angels" which doesn't appear to have appeased the members there much, since he called them trolls in his earlier post here and the tone of this latest post is a tad condescending.:)

Anyway, I just thought I would post this in case there was any confusion about what TrollsRUs quoted in his/her post above - see Renner's blog post here: http://mauramurray.blogspot.com/2013/02/dear-...

Ridiculous wrote:

<quoted text>
Look who stayed up all night writing Tomes full of drivel. Jenkins, as Tang once said, "you're to easy". You've become another one of those weird phenomenon. A blathering Idiot that is incapable of real conversation because you are manically stuck in a loop listening to your own voice, and thus absolutely incapable of hearing anyone Else's. You can pretend that you don't read my posts if you want, but, hopefully, as you read this, you hear me when I tell you that you are one the dumbest people to ever post here. You really are. You are the number one hypocrite on this site. It's blatantly obvious to any one that even attempts to read these long, rambling, manic posts of yours.The more people point out the flaws in your theories and the flaws in your cognition, the more weight you give yourself concerning your self righteousness. You aren't a very bright guy at all. You see everything in black and white and insist that there is no spectrum of color, because Bob Jenkins can't comprehend that colors may actually exist for the rest of the world.
You have this bizarre desire to criticize people for the very flaws that you consistently present here on this thread and it's quite interesting to study your patterns. It really is. I predict an escalation, and imho, you are pretty close to the old "bat crap crazy" point now...Mark my words... ; )

Yep, well said and to the point. Jenkins is probably the single reason I stopped coming here at all, he is that guy who just doesn't get it and is too stupid to even realize he is well, too stupid.

I wish you well, lol, because he will never change and will likely never stop posting.

If someone sits at their car for 15+ minutes after a crash Would you say that they're actively eluding LE? That they're so scared of LE they're willing to run into the woods through 2.5' of snow wearing sneakers and jeans to avoid them?? How do you account or her staying at the car so long in your theory?
Then someone who the witnesses said was walkin around fine, who's exhibiting no lack of motor skills; none is the classic things you would expect from a drunk person, and you guys think this person was drunk?

She stayed at her car 15 minutes, maybe even a few mins longer than that, then she went and hitched a ride. This is the same thing anyone might do in a similar situation. After 15 min, which probably feels like a half hour right after a crash, you might not think the cops are coming and think its time to hitch a ride. Especially someone from mass who's used to the cops showing up in 2 minutes. Besides how long are you supposed to stay at an accident? How long until you think no cops are coming? 20minutes? 30 minutes?

These are not the actions of someone particularly scared of the cops showing up. I would expect someone who's running from the cops to avoid a DUI to be out of there in a hurry, not sit around for 15 minutes.

My point is that none of you know what was in her head. For all you know she might've thought she waited it out long enough for the cops to show up. I'm sure she wasn't expecting to get abducted, I'm sure that was the last thing on her mind. Her, like many of you, probably thought 'what are the chances'. And she woulda been right too, the chances are super low, but sometimes the numbers just don't go your way.

I don't think she really wanted to talk to the cops, but that doesn't mean she's deathly afraid of them either.
But all that doesn't matter. Whether she was running from the cops after sitting there for 15 mins or she wasn't she still most likely caught a ride, she still probably got abducted by whoever picked her up. If that's what happened then the alcohol doesn't matter, what matters is the fact that someone abducted her, her motive for catching a ride doesn't matter what matters is who gave her the ride or who abducted her, if it was someone else. That's a big IF bc I'm not gonna claim I know what happened to her, but looking at everythin as a whole, that is the most likely sadly.

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
TrollsRUs, I was a bit confused about the above post. I at first thought you were JR, but since you said "Well said" in your first post, decided to look around. I then saw that JR posted the response above as a new blog entry today, titled as above to "Dear Trolls." I see that he also posted the same entry on the Maura Murray Missing Group page, after Helena Murray copied my "troll" post there. Interestingly, he dropped the "Dear Trolls" there and changed the intro to "Good morning angels" which doesn't appear to have appeased the members there much, since he called them trolls in his earlier post here and the tone of this latest post is a tad condescending.:)
Anyway, I just thought I would post this in case there was any confusion about what TrollsRUs quoted in his/her post above - see Renner's blog post here: http://mauramurray.blogspot.com/2013/02/dear-...

perhaps JR finds himself caught in the swirl of the current of misinformation and few facts. an understatement. lots of righteous pushback and mind-numbing repetition spread across several interactive sites.
i don't envy him; nor did i or would i ever
wish these kind of interactions on him.

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Looking at those who don't think that would be important or significant says volumes about how useful they would be in an "investigation". For some, they think feeling is enough, others just don't have any kind of a clue what they are doing.
Bill

your reply to her / them was very well expressed. i feel pretty certain it won't make a dent.

but i'm really hopeful we've helped Jenky figure out which thoughts he should probably hold privately and not openly express. things are looking up, except for the monitoring you feel obligated to oversee.

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep, well said and to the point. Jenkins is probably the single reason I stopped coming here at all, he is that guy who just doesn't get it and is too stupid to even realize he is well, too stupid.
I wish you well, lol, because he will never change and will likely never stop posting.

please return! your input is missed. hold out no expectation and you won't be disappointed.:)

Bill - how much easier to off-load the burden across some newer regulars. :)

Anyone else hearing the song "send in the clowns"?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Come on FakeLE, tell the kiddies the truth now, no stories. Sure I annoyed you but that's not why you stopped posting ad you kno it as well as I.
You got tired of being called out on your contant BS and misingotmation. No fun being called out for obviously having absolutely no inside info on this case. It was no fun for you because I made it just all too crystal clear that you're full of shit.

So thank you, I'm glad you stopped posting. Stopping idiots like you from spreading obvious bullshit as fact is exactly why I started posting again last year and the fact that you say that I am the reason you stopped posting I consider a small victory for the truth and keeping this forum alive.

I still question why someone would claim to have inside info if they don't. Were you here intentionall to spread misinfo or are you just an idiot know it all who thinks you know everything about eveything because you used to be a cop, or a mall cop, or something like that. Personally I lean towards thinking you're just an ec-cop know it all, but some of the things you've said have really made me question your true intent of being here. IDK, all i know is I'm glad I could do my part.

Look forward to many looooooooong posts from me in the future lol, there ain't no way i'm stopping posting any time soon.

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
This has to be the lowest post ever. You want people that work hard for their money and buy nice clothes and footware to donate those things they no longer want to help the poor and hungry so you can sit at a computer and buy them in bulk and make a profit for yourself by selling them out of the country. And then you have the nerve to say you make a handsome profit from doing this. Wow you're a piece of work.
I wonder if you're wearing one of Snowy's Cashmere hand me downs that she no longer wanted.

The sad part is, I don't even believe findmaura's post about profiteering off the donations of the kind-hearted well-to-do. Rather, I think she made that up to feign superiority over the rest of us here.

Faking a job as a Salvation Army resale expert is so pathetic that I can't even rip her post to shreds with my normal relish - I'm embarrassed for her, and so I cringed, and passed up on her fib.

Since when do people who are aftraid of the cops coming sit at their ar for 15 minutes? Maybe even a few minutes longer.

Seems to me that's a really long time to sit there if you are truly scared of the cops.

How do you people account for all that time she spent sitting on the side of the roade? How can that possibly fit into your theory that she was so scared of LE that she was about to run into the woods to her death to avoid them.. To me those things just don't add up

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
Yep, well said and to the point. Jenkins is probably the single reason I stopped coming here at all, he is that guy who just doesn't get it and is too stupid to even realize he is well, too stupid.
I wish you well, lol, because he will never change and will likely never stop posting.

Oh....How I have missed you....! Not....

Jenkins wrote:

Come on FakeLE, tell the kiddies the truth now, no stories. Sure I annoyed you but that's not why you stopped posting ad you kno it as well as I.
You got tired of being called out on your contant BS and misingotmation. No fun being called out for obviously having absolutely no inside info on this case. It was no fun for you because I made it just all too crystal clear that you're full of shit.
So thank you, I'm glad you stopped posting. Stopping idiots like you from spreading obvious bullshit as fact is exactly why I started posting again last year and the fact that you say that I am the reason you stopped posting I consider a small victory for the truth and keeping this forum alive.
I still question why someone would claim to have inside info if they don't. Were you here intentionall to spread misinfo or are you just an idiot know it all who thinks you know everything about eveything because you used to be a cop, or a mall cop, or something like that. Personally I lean towards thinking you're just an ec-cop know it all, but some of the things you've said have really made me question your true intent of being here. IDK, all i know is I'm glad I could do my part.
Look forward to many looooooooong posts from me in the future lol, there ain't no way i'm stopping posting any time soon.

This is just fascinating, misingotmation? okay. I know I stepped out there with "scoundrelish" But at least it was defined as a condiment in the uber hip urban dictionary.
"Stopping idiots like you from spreading obvious bullshit as fact" I'm just speechless! Did he really say this to someone else? I have to admit,I do study psychology, but at the end of the day, I really am just a layman. Can someone with a little more knowledge help me here in the strange case of Bob Jenkins?

Don't drunk people usually exhibit signs of being, well, drunk?
She was walking around her car on the side of the rd in the ice and snow just fine, no witneses report anything like her having any trouble walking or anything like that. I would expect a slip, or a fall, of even a little trip, something, anything from this girl walking on ice and snow wearing sneakers t

If she was so drunk that she was scare of a DUI then why doesn't she exhibit any of the classic signs of being drunk?

So you guys actully READ any of these witness statements or do you just think you maically know what they say?

How can you guys crtisize ANYBODY about ANYTHING when your whole entire theory is completely based on the ASSUMPTION that she was drunk. Your making faulty conclusions because you're basing them on assumptions that have no basis in reality.
My bigger question is whether or not you people actually BELIEVE the crap you write or if you're intentionally lying. I feel like a couple of you are intetnionally lying and then there's a couple of you who are just so deep in denial that it's ridiculous. I swwear some of the posters on this thread could be case studies in denial.

Simply Sarcasm wrote:

<quoted text>
The sad part is, I don't even believe findmaura's post about profiteering off the donations of the kind-hearted well-to-do. Rather, I think she made that up to feign superiority over the rest of us here.
Faking a job as a Salvation Army resale expert is so pathetic that I can't even rip her post to shreds with my normal relish - I'm embarrassed for her, and so I cringed, and passed up on her fib.

It's big business. Herb baumeister built quite an empire just in the domestic market doing this. If the damn fool hadn't buried the bodies of his dead male lovers in his yard, who knows how far he could have gone. I don't believe for a second that Findy buries bodies in her yard....She has the whole enchanted forest at her "disposal" ; )