Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

oUo wrote:

<quoted text>ur so dumb

Judged:

4

3

3

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand that there can be confusion. But be aware. There is and never has been any POI. There has never been any evidence that anything has happened to Maura. There is clear evidence that she lied to run away from school for a while. There is evidence that there was alcohol in the car. There is clearly a motive for her to not be waiting around when the police arrived. People watching the car didn't hear or see anything to indicate she left the car in any manner than by her own motivation.
Bill

Judged:

2

2

2

rozShoem wrote:

<quoted text>
Bill,
...and WHY do you suppose there has never been a POI? There MIGHT have been and STILL may be a person of interest. Why do you suppose, Bill, a POI has never been identified? Any ideas at all? Maybe he was never interviewed? Perhaps. Why would that have happened? Why? Because someone...many someones it appears, for whatever reason, may have dropped the ball? Why? Possibly for the same reason a lot of other actions did not take place in regard to this case? Someone asked WHY so many people are absorbed by this particular case. So many people who are finding it difficult to let go. Why do you suppose this is the case? Because people are not stupid, that's why. People realize there is a high probability that a grave injustice has taken place, that something is terribly wrong. Blaming the victim will never take away the stench of injustice linked to this terrible tragedy. In my opinion, Maura's father was correct when he said that some dirtbag had abducted his daughter. He had a father's intuition, a strong intuition that many others share.

Judged:

1

1

1

rozShoem wrote:

Shack,
You were correct about him being in "F" Troop in 2004. Also, you mention a transfer? Looks like he may now be with "G" Troop.

Judged:

1

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

After reading here for so long, the one word that comes to mind more often than any other, is the word "intuition".
Intuition is the motivating reason for this post.
Maura's mom died on Maura's birthday. I think that reaches far beyond intuition, to somewhere where the human spirit transcends all other intuitive boundaries. To me it is the ultimate confirmation of what she felt happened to Maura.
We've witnessed this before with Adams and Jefferson.
Something so powerful should not be ignored.

mcsmom wrote:

After reading here for so long, the one word that comes to mind more often than any other, is the word "intuition".
Intuition is the motivating reason for this post.
Maura's mom died on Maura's birthday. I think that reaches far beyond intuition, to somewhere where the human spirit transcends all other intuitive boundaries. To me it is the ultimate confirmation of what she felt happened to Maura.
We've witnessed this before with Adams and Jefferson.
Something so powerful should not be ignored.

Judged:

1

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
In its simplest terms are you seriously telling me that Maura is dead and because she wanted her mother with her, she killed her mother on her birthday?
Bill

Judged:

2

1

1

mcsmom wrote:

<quoted text>
In the simplest of terms. No.

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>
I really wish I could talk to someone neutral (not therapeutic) about this, but Topix is the only choice, and a very poor one at that. Little threads are just a bad way of getting at something and making some progress.
I think that if someone is more or less after me, then maybe that's a clue as to what really happened. I'm all at sixes and nines over this today.

Judged:

2

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
As is normally the case, we need to look at your writings piece by piece.
The definition of POI (person of interest) means that they police think they have someone in the case that may have information in the case. The person doesn’t rise to the level of a suspect but potentially could be a suspect. Several people (witnesses) were interviewed in this case. Some of them even took lie detectors.
People are always interested when pretty young white women disappear. It apparently is who we are. Look at Nancy Grace. She makes her living off of family misery, sometimes saying the most stupid things imaginable. And if you notice these are mostly missing pretty white woman. It has now become something of a national pastime.
And while intuition is tons of fun on Oprah, it really has nothing to do with crime and the science used to solve crimes. Science and fact based evidence are actually the tools used to solve crime. Psychics and yes even intuition are not very useful.
And no injustice has occurred as you like to say. When something breaks in this case, science and LE will move forward. They won’t forget, they won’t stop looking into it. Intuition can keep shouting whatever it wants, no one with sense listens because intuition doesn’t point to a cause, manner or person involved in her disappearance.
Bill

Judged:

2

2

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand that there can be confusion. But be aware. There is and never has been any POI. There has never been any evidence that anything has happened to Maura. There is clear evidence that she lied to run away from school for a while. There is evidence that there was alcohol in the car. There is clearly a motive for her to not be waiting around when the police arrived. People watching the car didn't hear or see anything to indicate she left the car in any manner than by her own motivation.
Bill

Judged:

1

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand that there can be confusion. But be aware. There is and never has been any POI. There has never been any evidence that anything has happened to Maura. There is clear evidence that she lied to run away from school for a while. There is evidence that there was alcohol in the car. There is clearly a motive for her to not be waiting around when the police arrived. People watching the car didn't hear or see anything to indicate she left the car in any manner than by her own motivation.
Bill

Judged:

2

1

1

rozShoem wrote:

<quoted text>
Based on dog handler, scent was lost down the highway at intersection. So a reasonable possibility is that a vehicle stopped there.....Maura felt safe and got in with this person. Okay, Bill. Let's as you say, "take this piece by piece."
-Maura rejected assistance from SBD.
-Maura did NOT knock on doors of any houses in area to seek help
-Based on theory she got into someone's car at that intersection,
where dog lost scent, she must have had REASON to trust the
driver of this car
Now...let's consider who most people SHOULD have reason to trust....
ANY ideas?