Maura Murray

Judged:

1

1

1

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>For one PIs had stated from day one when they became involved they would report to LE with anything they were told and learned regarding this case. Maybe Iam misunderstanding what you are saying. Do you believe I should put out names and locations? Im sorry but if one has not put there name out to the media I personally will not put names and locations out there.

Judged:

1

1

FrmLE wrote:

<quoted text>
Is this a hypothetical?

Judged:

1

1

1

FrmLE wrote:

I have a legitimate question.
Does anyone here think that Jenkins reads anything that is written? Be honest with me, is it just me or is it like trying to communicate with a monkey?
I have never had to interact with anyone who so clearly ignores what is written and just continues on the same path as if no information was received.
Please tell me it's not me.

Judged:

1

1

1

Lady Gray1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, I suppose so.....no proof or evidence of anything.

Judged:

1

1

1

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
Stupid question. I can say I spoke with 40 people but because we are playing by your rules no names have to be given.
Don't stop posting on this forum. What else could you be doing? Helping your other cousin? Nah this is much better time spent.

Judged:

1

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>I never asked for any names.I will protect those whom have talked to me in confidentuality. Iam going but what I think is morally right. Did you personally travel to NH and speak to people face to face in NH? Only trying to help find a missing cousin.

Judged:

1

1

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
NO ONE has asked you to name names. you are the one fixated on this concept.
my comment suggests that so-called "PIs" of varying levels of expertise / professionalism have been quoted as if their words are gospel for as long as i've participated here.
i, personally, wouldn't trust intermediaries, and as family, would take information directly to law enforcement authorities who are handling the active investigation.

Judged:

1

1

1

Jenkins wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL, wow, are you really this stupid old man? Or are you just getting so old now that you don't remember things quite clearly? And I wonder, just how old is mr FrmLE anyways? LOL
You said: "If it is a homicide for example, the case is a HPD case, up to the time it is taken by NHSP MC Unit" Wow, you could not be more wrong. If it is a homicide case it would not be touched by the HPD because they don't have a CRIME LAB. My god, you really just can't admit when you're wrong about something can you? You may be intelligent but you're seriously lacking in wisdom, it's unbelievable.
If there is a homicide in Haverhill the HPD calls the NHSP who sends up their mobile crime lab to proccess the scene and the case it taken by the MCU, plain and simple. THe HPD does not have the means or ability to process a murder scene and then conduct a proper investigation. A murder case will NEVER be an HPD case, unless you're counting the hour or 2 that the HPD secures the scene while waiting for the MCU to show up, but actually the NHSP would be on the scene of a homicide long before that anyways.
Bottom line is that the HPD, or any small town, 2-4 man police force doesn't have the manpower, resources or training to handle a homicide investigation.
As for the argument in the back yard, that is up for debate and it is possible this person misheard the argument but judging by the fact that the peson sought out the family to give them this info, it probably is valid. I believe they did hear some sort of argument but the exact topic of the argument is up for debate.
But the only thing that I could see there being any sort of argument like that is if one cop, Smith, thought that she was abducted. If there is a belief that she was abducted then clearly that case would need to be handled by the NHSP MCU, not the HPD. Monahan could've argued that there is no real evidence she was abducted, no clear sign of a struggle and at that point it's just a one car accident, which would fall under the HPD's responsibility.
There's not much debate over jurisdiction in NH since it's a mutual aid state, this is the ONLY situation I could see there even being any sort of argument. If the local guy thinks that she was abducted and the statie doesn't; I could also see an argument like that possibly getting pretty heated if the local guy really thinks she got abducted and the investigation needs to be started for real immediately.
Makes me wonder if we would be sitting her talking about this right now if the NHSP MCU took the case that night instead of on wednesday when instead we now have Smith lying to the family saying that he thought is was Fred driving.
Damn FrmLE, you must be getting old, it's not that hard to understand that a dep't like the HPD can't handle and wouldn't touch a murder case. Getting hard to read in your old age or something? Maybe you need some new glasses? lol....Old man FrmLE
LOL, and for the record, no, I can't read, obviously I'm completely illiterate.

Judged:

1

1

1

citigirl wrote:

I will protect those whom have talked to me in confidentuality. Iam going but what I think is morally right.

Judged:

1

1

1

amy researches wrote:

<quoted text>
I agree with you that names and locations should not be put out there. And I am sure these people would not have taken time out to come talk to you if they didn't think what they had overheard might be important for whatever reason. I am curious though as to if they mentioned anything else they had witnessed that night. If they were close enough to hear this, did they hear anything else?

Judged:

1

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>I have passed all info over to one of the PIs that were investigating the case.

Judged:

1

Wowzer the real one wrote:

<quoted text>
You are wrong Jenkins. Look up the Chris Gray murder. The Haverhill police dept was involved in the investigation and apprehension of the murderers along with the help of the NHSP and AG.
To say "A murder case will NEVER be an HPD case" is absolutely not true.

Judged:

1

1

1

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
I have stated before. I don't think he reads anything. And if he does read, he doesn't understand, and if he understands, he just wants to be contrary.

Jenkins wrote:

Lighthouse ... Sounds like now you're just being a bitch, no offense.

Judged:

1

citigirl wrote:

<quoted text>This was a sad and heartbreaking case.

Judged:

1

1

1

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
^^^This.
<quoted text>
Priceless!
No offense, bitch!!
You can't make this stuff up.
:)

FrmLE wrote:

I have a legitimate question.
Does anyone here think that Jenkins reads anything that is written? Be honest with me, is it just me or is it like trying to communicate with a monkey?
I have never had to interact with anyone who so clearly ignores what is written and just continues on the same path as if no information was received.
Please tell me it's not me.