Maura Murray

Lighthouse 101 wrote:

<quoted text>
I understand why people might change their stories, or not want their property searched. Simple reasoning can explain this, but we don't use reason in witch hunts.

I can see people not wanting their property searched. Honestly I wouldn't let LE search my property even if someone went missing next door, I can search my own property better than LE can, I see no reason for any LE to be on my property unless I commit a crime & they have a warrant. I would never get a court order saying that, but if someone has the money to do that that's their right. Althought it does seem kinda suspicous for someone to take it that far.
As for the family of the missing person i would have no problem letting them cut through my property or looking through the woods that are on the back few acres of my property.

But you can see how someone would change their story?? WTH are you talking about?? You can't be for real with that statement can you? Whatever happened is what happened, there should never be more than one story. Can you please explain that statement & how you can understand someone changing their story? That's a very strange comment right there.

And the witch hunt comment, I don't understand, you're conducting a witch hunt? I assume you must not be talking about yourself but who the hell are you talking about?? When was there a witch hunt? Who's conducting a witch hunt? You can't be talking about this case, are you just talking in general or something? I don't understand your reference to a witch hunt & how it fits in to anything anyone's saying or is this just another time that you're talking about something that means nothing about nothing? That seems to happen kinda often with you for some reason.

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
No, its not you. They are unintelligible because it is written in shack-enese. A rare, very flighty and difficult to pin down language. Made to obscure weak thoughts rather than convey information.
I hope you don't think the babbling that she displays today, was actually limited to just recently? These most recent posts are actually less rambling and if you can believe it, more coherent than what she use to post.
If she ever had an original thought, I am certain it died of loneliness.
Bill

Dude really there is no need to dump on shack. People are people and you are no different. try understanding first before you judge.You are not perfect sir.

"If she ever had an original thought, I am certain it died of loneliness.
Bill "

That is just really mean an uncalled for. You might not agree with shack but to be downright m=nasty to a 73 year old lady is disgusting.

Jenkins....for the first time ever...you lost me...
not search your property...? puhleeze...

Not my bedroom..kitchen type search....but a not land search? Why not.....? unless of a fear of...?

I have always been agreeable to your Posts...but...

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
yea I saw those time mistakes also but we are all human so I say let it go. We all Know what he meant to print.

Well,*we*(regulars/long-timers on Topix) may know what he meant, but people who may only read JR's blog won't know the difference. I think it matters whether it was citigirl or Maruchan who gave the information about the elevations on the routes under discussion. Things like that. Sure, we're all human, but what JG was bringing to JR's blog was to be specific analysis and one would hope for clarity with that.

I'm just sayin'

Bill- I have no respect for you at all. While you might contain knowledge, You have no compassion for people and that is what life is all about. You my friend are missing out on the truth of why we are here.You will realize it when someone you love passes away.

The Bill I am referring to is WTH and not Bill NH

jwb...I like to fish...with lures...my favorite is a gold flat fish....worms only when I am near the shore.
I catch and release.

Advocate wrote:

<quoted text>
Well,*we*(regulars/long-timers on Topix) may know what he meant, but people who may only read JR's blog won't know the difference. I think it matters whether it was citigirl or Maruchan who gave the information about the elevations on the routes under discussion. Things like that. Sure, we're all human, but what JG was bringing to JR's blog was to be specific analysis and one would hope for clarity with that.
I'm just sayin'

Don't get me wrong. I am not impressed with the JG addition while I do respect him, I think he should have his own blog.

Unless it is big enough for breakfast.....

Shack wrote:

jwb...I like to fish...with lures...my favorite is a gold flat fish....worms only when I am near the shore.
I catch and release.

Please explain you lost me.You sound so different lately Shack?

Is it Shacks husband posting tonight?

I don't have a husband.....geez...He's dead...I like to fish....so many people here "fishing".....hoping for someone to "get" some info. that one can twist n turn into some kind of negativity about Maura and her family/friends.
I don't hunt....perhaps some will find some hunting soon. Still hunting for Maura.

JWB...I play scrabble too...without man dictionary.

BillNH wrote:

<quoted text>
The thing is, all or some of the dirt might really mean something. None of us, unless we were witnesses to what actually happened, can say what led to what. For example, the fact that Kathleen was arrested for growing pot 7 years after MM disappeared could be tied to the cause of MM's disappearance. It's how you investigate...find the connections. The main fact is, we don't know what is relevant until we know the truth. It's all fair game until then.

Bill I agree with a good amount of what you post but I'm just not understanding this one.

Maura's older sister growing pot 7 YEARS later could be connected to her dissapearance?!?! What??? How could that POSSIBLY be connected to her little sister's dissapearance 7 years earlier??? Maybe you could explain just one way that could possibly have any connection to her dissapearance??

It was 7 YEARS later and she got busted with a few pot plants max in her back yard. How do I know it was just a few plants?? Bc there were no other charges. It literally was probably like 1 or 2 plants. If she had a lot of plants they would of hit her with a real charge like distribution or somethig like that. They also must've swathed her home bc that would be pc & if she had any baggies, scales, or even any useable marijuana in her house they would've hit her with a real charge too.

This was like such a minor offense, she was growing a couple pot plants & didn't even have any pot in her house, so she obviously wasn't dealing bc they would've charged her with dealing if there was ANY evidence even SUGGESTING she was a dealer, just like sandwich baggies could've gotten her a distribution charge. Remember that cops LOVE to charge shit, even I they know the charges won't stick in court. If they had ANYTHING suggesting she was dealing they would've charged her with distribution or attempt to distribute or something like that.

So how in the hell could her growing a few pot plants in her back yard POSSIBLY have ANYTHING to do with Maura's dissapearance 7 years earlier??

It can't, it just doesn't. There's no freekin way.

Maybe you could explain your reasoning here bill? In what way could her older sister having a couple weed plants in her back yard 7 years later possbly be connected to Maura's dissapearance??

I'm sorry but that's just tabloid bullshit that Renner posted on his blog to keep it interesting, plain and simple.
His blog is not a search for MM, it's a tabloid rag sheet at this point, it's the MM equivalent of tmz.com . He's not looking for Maura, he's digging up dirt on Maura's past.

What is he afraid of? Why doesn't he go dig up some dirt on the local area where she went missing too? There a whole lot of it & some of that MIGHT actually have something to do with Maura's dissapearance.

IMHO he's taking the easy way out, how hard is it to dig up dirt on someone's family & friends from their past? Not very.
I'm just very disappointed in the direction his blog took. Originally I thought he was doing a good job but at this point I think he hit a brick wall & went in the wrong direction with it.

Can you please explain your reasoning on that bill? I would love to hear how you think that could be connected.

JWB wrote:

<quoted text>
what are you referring to? What Post?

i've noticed, first because the language is so awkward, and secondly, the language speaks to hearsay and gossip.
maybe i 've heightened your awareness for when you read it in future posts, as well.

Awe, Jwb wants wth to have some compassion...How sweet...Shack speaks in metaphors; She catches and releases...while retaining nothing...unless it's big enough for breakfast... Red herring, cream cheese and bagels...
WTH, If you could please call Shack a dink or possibly try and expose her or her address, we would believe you are a compassionate man, otherwise, I just don't respect you...

JWB wrote:

Bill- I have no respect for you at all. While you might contain knowledge, You have no compassion for people and that is what life is all about.

How will I go on? And I have letters in my file from mothers and others about my compassion and knowledge. It is my compassion that keeps me here trying to mitigate any increase of damage in the area by her.

Shack on the other hand knows why she gets the deserved treatment she gets. Has the lack of respect she garnered. The disdain that many feel for her. It never was or is about her age or sex. Things that can't be seen in the typed word. It is all about the toxic cloud she left behind and never said a word to try to correct what she did. It is her words that still linger heavy in the area.

And as a source of knowledge, keep reading shacks posts about the area, about what happened, and who she accuses, which is just about everyone. How anything done in the pursuit of Maura and her "kidnappers and killers" is justified. No matter who is hurt. Then come back and talk to me about how useful her posts are, and about her compassion.

Yeah, I'll try to muddle on knowing that you don't respect me. You seem to run kind of hot and cold in the respect department. If you remember, I try to do what is right, no matter who is involved.

Bill

Why was Maura Murray's Saturn damaged before it left Amherst and was subsequently found in Haverhill NH?

Someone had to have shown the Saturn to BSG, who saw the car's damage in the Amherst MA area before the Saturn left for Haverhill NH.

And the craziness continues..........

BillNH wrote:

<quoted text>
I would be happy to 'not like' what you are saying....if I could figure out what you are saying...that is one jumbled up, incomprehensible post..lol

Eeeeee. Gebasay whaaaaaaa?