Maura Murray

hi all ,so, from Maura saying 2 words 'my sister' to her supervisor counselling was advised .Someone told the supervisor that something was up with Maura and she went to check on her.Who was the person that saw Maura needed attention.Maybe another member of the Bobbisue crew.take care philip

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
you are clearly proving you are new to the 10 year discussion, although fewer years on Topix, because you conclude, after all, that anything could have happened to Maura.
to remain in a tunnel, or to endlessly attempt to counterargue the tunnel-dweller out of his cave is...well...a Pointless Endeavor (caps for emphasis).
now, take your level of reasoning, and extend it to the intended book currently underway.
the facts are not fully established and the timeline can neither be complete nor accurate; the writer does not have access to records held by authorities because the investigation remains open.
i say the timing of the book, if published sooner than later, is premature. still, some will be curious to read it. i prefer to read non-fiction.

They are too busy over there patting each other on the head for great diction. Doesn't seem to matter what wild ass stuff you say as long as you write it well. I agree that without finding some real information, there is not much point in publishing. So far they are just batting around the same stuff we do here, but they feel pretty important in the process.

Advocate wrote:

<quoted text>
Kind of makes you wonder if Green made it up/sent it to himself just to boost the blog with some new "mysterious something", in furtherance of your thought above. But nahhh, no one would do that. Would they?

Just an FYI to you and Snowy and in an effort to keep facts straight - Green's blog posts are preceded by his goofy logo, whereas Renner's are not. Also both sign their names to their separate posts. The post about the email was made by Renner.

I agree with both your thoughts on the email post.

Also, in reference to your earlier posts, Advocate, about Green confusing my name and citigirl's name, I believe that may have been deliberate. A person commented about it on that blog entry:

"SAHMay 16, 2013 at 12:39 AM
Super petty comment here....
Topix is all up in arms because apparently it was Maruchan, not citigirl, who said the thing about the terrain being hilly. Just wanted to give John a heads up.

Great post as far as I'm concerned."

Here is Green's response:

"John GreenMay 18, 2013 at 1:22 AM
I am glad they have found something meaningful to discuss.

:)

John"

I think it's pretty clear what his priorities are, and accuracy isn't one of them.

BillNH wrote:

<quoted text>
They are too busy over there patting each other on the head for great diction. Doesn't seem to matter what wild ass stuff you say as long as you write it well. I agree that without finding some real information, there is not much point in publishing. So far they are just batting around the same stuff we do here, but they feel pretty important in the process.

LOL absolutely. write it well, and write it long.
so, a few "camps" are well established. MMM FB, Team Green, and Team Topix Freelancers / Loosely Held.

Advocate wrote:

<quoted text>
Kind of makes you wonder if Green made it up/sent it to himself just to boost the blog with some new "mysterious something", in furtherance of your thought above. But nahhh, no one would do that. Would they?

naaahhh, would they? really?

BillNH wrote:

<quoted text>
They are too busy over there patting each other on the head for great diction. Doesn't seem to matter what wild ass stuff you say as long as you write it well. I agree that without finding some real information, there is not much point in publishing. So far they are just batting around the same stuff we do here, but they feel pretty important in the process.

It doesn't even matter if you DON'T write well, or are nearly illiterate, Green will still shower you with compliments for your incredible grasp of the case. Here's a fine example:

"Anonymous May 14, 2013 at 8:19 AM
Yeah because drunk 20 somethings think that rationally. That would be smeart for someone who knew what they were doing. Can we at least agree that MM was not at her best. This whole scenerio that everything was staged is ridiculous. I really respect John Green but keep it simple. MM getting out of a tandum car to stage a running that might or might of not been seen is stretching it to say the least. She could of also been attacked by Big Foot. You guys go a long ways to try and expalin why this was not a simple murder of oppurtinty. Some sicko got her and I think the NHLE has a better idea who it is than they are letting on. But who am I, I only did felony defense trials for 12 years."

Hmmm. Not counting obvious typos, check out the misspelled words: "scenerio," "tandum," "oppurtinty," and the continual use of the word "of" instead of "have" - "She could of," "might of not been seen." I'm trying to figure out how a person who "did felony defense trials" could have such a poor grasp of the English language.

But hey, John Green thinks this guy is great! Part of his response:

"Given your degree of education and brains ... I can see that you are very smart and you know your stuff ... the FAR BIGGER POINT is that you clearly have a lot to offer ... thanks in advance for returning and sharing your capabilities with us."

It must be such a wonderful experience to have JOHN GREEN tell you that he thinks you are intelligent - what an honor!

Actually, I think Green and Renner make a great pair. They both have enormous egos, obviously suffer from Narcissistic Personality Disorder, are obsessed with Beagle, love to reveal poster's real identities, and neither one has a clue what happened to Maura Murray. Quite a team, I think.:)

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
Just an FYI to you and Snowy and in an effort to keep facts straight - Green's blog posts are preceded by his goofy logo, whereas Renner's are not. Also both sign their names to their separate posts. The post about the email was made by Renner.
I agree with both your thoughts on the email post.
Also, in reference to your earlier posts, Advocate, about Green confusing my name and citigirl's name, I believe that may have been deliberate. A person commented about it on that blog entry:
"SAHMay 16, 2013 at 12:39 AM
Super petty comment here....
Topix is all up in arms because apparently it was Maruchan, not citigirl, who said the thing about the terrain being hilly. Just wanted to give John a heads up.
Great post as far as I'm concerned."
Here is Green's response:
"John GreenMay 18, 2013 at 1:22 AM
I am glad they have found something meaningful to discuss.
:)
John"
I think it's pretty clear what his priorities are, and accuracy isn't one of them.

i'll need to look more closely, Maruchan. i've flown by with my phone on my broom without having paid too much attention to where Green begins and Renner ends or vice versa.
i hadn't realized there was a competition going on, but it seems like they find Topix worthy of comment.

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>
Just an FYI to you and Snowy and in an effort to keep facts straight - Green's blog posts are preceded by his goofy logo, whereas Renner's are not. Also both sign their names to their separate posts. The post about the email was made by Renner.
I agree with both your thoughts on the email post.
Also, in reference to your earlier posts, Advocate, about Green confusing my name and citigirl's name, I believe that may have been deliberate. A person commented about it on that blog entry:
"SAHMay 16, 2013 at 12:39 AM
Super petty comment here....
Topix is all up in arms because apparently it was Maruchan, not citigirl, who said the thing about the terrain being hilly. Just wanted to give John a heads up.
Great post as far as I'm concerned."
Here is Green's response:
"John GreenMay 18, 2013 at 1:22 AM
I am glad they have found something meaningful to discuss.
:)
John"
I think it's pretty clear what his priorities are, and accuracy isn't one of them.

Ahhh. Then why should accuracy be one of mine?:P

Maruchan wrote:

<quoted text>..... I'm trying to figure out how a person who "did felony defense trials" could have such a poor grasp of the English language.

If it's even true that the individual "did felony defense trials", he/she must have had a bang-up paralegal and secretary (who both knew spelling and grammar).

The whole point being, if they can't get their sources and dates straight -- and don't care enough to correct them when others try to help by nicely pointing the discrepancies out -- then how can anyone be sure of anything written by them on the site? The whole shebang could be riddled with errors.

Riddled, I say!

whiston wrote:

hi all ,so, from Maura saying 2 words 'my sister' to her supervisor counselling was advised .Someone told the supervisor that something was up with Maura and she went to check on her.Who was the person that saw Maura needed attention.Maybe another member of the Bobbisue crew.take care philip

It wasn't what Maura said.

It was the fact that she was not responsive to anyone that alarmed the supervisor.

Picture your boss standing over you (inches away) asking you questions and instead of answering your boss, you just stare ahead blankly for minutes on in and don't have any kind of reaction whatsoever to your boss.

Then you breakdown and cry and then you go back to staring blankly ahead and not acknowledging anyone in the room.

That was Maura's demeanor that night. And that is what caught the attention of the supervisor for her to know Maura wasn't in a good spot mentally.

Alden H Olson wrote:

<quoted text>
Reliance Auto has had a body shop out back for years.

Tang Zoi wrote:

Reliance auto does NOT HAVE a BSG....they are only sales.

Alden H Olson wrote:

<quoted text>
Reliance Auto has had a body shop out back for years.

Tang Zoi wrote:

<quoted text>
Not what they said when I called them.!

Alden H Olson wrote:

<quoted text>
Reliance Auto has had a body shop out back for years.

Tang Zoi wrote:

<quoted text>
Sales only

http://detectivedirtbag.blogspot.com/2012/09/...

Alden H Olson wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
http://detectivedirtbag.blogspot.com/2012/09/...

You win the Internet.

:-)

Alden H Olson wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
http://detectivedirtbag.blogspot.com/2012/09/...

Go Alden! LOL!

John Green is Beagle.......

Alden H Olson wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
http://detectivedirtbag.blogspot.com/2012/09/...

so, now, why would someone consistently post to the contrary?
his credibility is zero. the annoyance factor is ten.

Tang Zoi wrote:

John Green is Beagle.......

nah, not Beags.
seems like both you and John Green have a case of Beagleitis with a touch of B-paranoia-itis.
and if you're a PI, fake or real, your instinct would lead you to more accurate observations and conclusions.
if i'm wrong, and i'm probably not, then the ole' Beags will have the last laugh.

SnowyB wrote:

<quoted text>
nah, not Beags.
seems like both you and John Green have a case of Beagleitis with a touch of B-paranoia-itis.
and if you're a PI, fake or real, your instinct would lead you to more accurate observations and conclusions.
if i'm wrong, and i'm probably not, then the ole' Beags will have the last laugh.

I also doubt it's Beagle.It's not his style of writing.

Tang Zoi wrote:

John Green is Beagle.......

Time to put the bong down.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...