Maura Murray

What became of the potential new evidence that was reported in early 2010?

they lost it all.

I broke into the office and stole it. I dont want to be found.

hannah_b wrote:

What became of the potential new evidence that was reported in early 2010?

Maura wrote:

I broke into the office and stole it. I dont want to be found.
<quoted text>

im gonna git ya too.

hannah_b wrote:

What became of the potential new evidence that was reported in early 2010?

Hannah b. I have wondered the same thing, a big announcement on the eve of the discovery channel piece and then nothing. I wonder.

Hi all there was an article in the Eagle Tribune dated May 1st 2009.I am wondering if the corner lot was finally able to be searched as the property was for sale.take care philip

philip, I am sure whitewash or wowzer know for sure, but believe it was.

Anne wrote:

philip, I am sure whitewash or wowzer know for sure, but believe it was.

Wonder why it took 5+ years for it to be searched.

Hi all,as I understand it mr Atwoods property was searched without any problem or protest.However as I understand it the property across the street which is on the corner of Bradley Hill Road and was where the Saturn was found was not searched for a long time and the owner refused a request for the property to be searched.At some point the trailer on the property was taken south to Lyme N.H. and was searched by N.H.L.E. and its phorensic people.Why would someone refuse a property search to help find a missing person.It is as odd as why Maura's family wil not speak about her prior life in Amherst and Hanson.take care philip

and, so, the bandwagon rolls on. implicating the locals. day in and day out. year in and year out. relentless smearing.

whiston wrote:

Why would someone refuse a property search to help find a missing person.

Because its your constitutional right to refuse a search.

whiston wrote:

Why would someone refuse a property search to help find a missing person.

Easy, it is your right. You are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures. If an officer showed up at the door and wanted to search my property or dwelling, I would be polite but refuse also.

If you have evidence something was there you could get a warrant. If you don't have evidence, I might search if you want but you are not stepping foot on my property.

Look how well all that helping and cooperation worked out for the SBD.

In memory of SBD

Bill

Snowy wrote:

and, so, the bandwagon rolls on. implicating the locals. day in and day out. year in and year out. relentless smearing.

Nobody is implicating anyone. Asking questions Snowy sheesh, what is your problem? Starting to seriously make me wonder about you and your motives. Asking why someone didn't want their property search is NOT implicating someone. Get a grip, seriously.

Sara wrote:

<quoted text>
Nobody is implicating anyone. Asking questions Snowy sheesh, what is your problem? Starting to seriously make me wonder about you and your motives. Asking why someone didn't want their property search is NOT implicating someone. Get a grip, seriously.

Sara please reread Whiston's post. If you don't think that what he said and the way he said it was to cast suspicion and to make the CW look guilty of something because he wouldn't allow his property to be searched then maybe you need to get a grip.
This circle has gone around and around so many times I can't keep track and it's now back again to those few houses even though they were hung out to dry years ago and their bones been picked clean.
Maybe we should be wondering about you and YOUR motives.

Hi all, I think it is odd that C.W.'property was not included in the 1 mile radius search in July 2004.Thats it.It seems odd to me that anybody with kids would not want to help solve this.When the trailer was taken from C.W.s' property to Lyme N.H.it was searched,I assume because the new owner gave the o.k.As for implicating or smearing the locals,I don't think I have ever done that.As I understand it C.W.s' property was the closest, within feet, of where the Saturn was found.As for the circle going around and around so many times,I think we just are still not clear what and when happened that night.As for L.T.Scarinza I think he was being delicate with his statements about Maura's prior life.Take care Philip

The circling and reviewing is in the hands of the NH Cold Case Unit.

I am sick of this BS! Maura call ur damn family and let them know u r ok, just say "i'm ok" and hang up.
You know u r out there, ok, u just enjoy looking at sites like these and seeing peeople worry. U should be ASHAMED.

Sara wrote:

<quoted text>
Nobody is implicating anyone. Asking questions Snowy sheesh, what is your problem? Starting to seriously make me wonder about you and your motives. Asking why someone didn't want their property search is NOT implicating someone. Get a grip, seriously.

'sheesh', continued mention of the SBD and CW is exactly that...implied involvement in the disappearance of Maura Murray. that simple.

oh, and Sara, i'm actually not interesting in conversing with you.
i'm here to identify old patterns and chants against the locals, and regard my own comments as self-limiting...no reply is necessary.

Snowy wrote:

oh, and Sara, i'm actually not interesting in conversing with you.
i'm here to identify old patterns and chants against the locals, and regard my own comments as self-limiting...no reply is necessary.

Coolio