Maura Murray

For your information James Renner has added some new information on his Maura Murray blog today.
Mr Renner makes it quite clear that the disputed phone call to Bill Rausch when he was going through airport security was NOT made by Maura, but by a Red Cross worker trying to get hold of Bill Rausch.

How very unnecessary to accuse Billy of falsely claiming to be engaged to Maura to get a leave from the army.
Re the Red Cross call, I believe Dawn explained to us it really could not be traced, and IIRC the RC denied having made the call, so it would be interesting to know just how Renner got this information. I seriously hope this isn´t just an atempt at sensationalism and profitting from other people´s tragedy. The Rausch family has my full understanding for not granting him an interview.

Snowy wrote:

unfortunately, Team Maura has muddied (soiled) the waters over many years. there is only theater; hearsay abounds.
question what you read, and believe even less of what you may hear.
note to ms. mayotte:
you'd be urged, by common sense, not to wait another year longer; contact the police to tell them you're interested in furthering their investigation.

People are afraid to contact the police.

Beagle wrote:

One thing is absolutely certain. Maura's disappearance was being investigated from a MA perspective, in MA, on Friday, May 27, 2011. It was being investigated not by the police nor by the pro bono NH private detective group that includes Weeper, et al.
Maura's family was not the source of payment for this work, which was billable and expensive.
If Maura's family is not paying for it, then who is?
Remember, in their own words, they pursue only probabilities, not mere possibilities, which they automatically toss aside. The effort on May 27 was not considered wasted. And that's from the horse's mouth.

The "problem" originated in NH. Various organizations, agencies...can dance, prance, toss confetti to the wind or whatever in MA.....but the dirtbag lives in NH.

WTH-the-original wrote:

<quoted text>
Regardless of the nitwit that gave you the peanut, mmmmm peanut. Regardless, you are correct. The family and cohorts insist and continue to insist that Maura's run from school and her continued absence has nothing to do with what made her run from the school under the guise of "a death in the family". Even though they disregard that has anything to do with her running, it absolutely needs to be checked. She may have had something happen after her car crash or she may have just done what was logical to her. Continue a plan that she created at school because of stresses in her life she no longer wanted to deal with.
Bill

The "cover-up" did not occur in MA. The incident occurred in NH and the cover-up has continued in NH. The "something" that occurred after the car crash has prevented several people from coming forth. Why? They are frightened and it seems for very good reason. All of the focus on MA is simply a distraction. She had no plan. One might say that like an unsuspecting rabbit, she simply happened to cross the path of that sly coyote.

hannah_b wrote:

How very unnecessary to accuse Billy of falsely claiming to be engaged to Maura to get a leave from the army.
Re the Red Cross call, I believe Dawn explained to us it really could not be traced, and IIRC the RC denied having made the call, so it would be interesting to know just how Renner got this information. I seriously hope this isn´t just an atempt at sensationalism and profitting from other people´s tragedy. The Rausch family has my full understanding for not granting him an interview.

it is, of course, a need to stir the pot, turn a profit, and play into the featured storyline du jour. if Team Maura knows so much, she'd have been found by now.
and of course, no need for Renner's helper to update the contents of a blog to Topix. we know where to find it, if interested.

Snowy wrote:

<quoted text>
it is, of course, a need to stir the pot, turn a profit, and play into the featured storyline du jour. if Team Maura knows so much, she'd have been found by now.
and of course, no need for Renner's helper to update the contents of a blog to Topix. we know where to find it, if interested.

Snowy,
I take exception to the tone of yours in your rather nasty and insulting comment above. There really is no need for that sort of sniping, is there?
Let me make one thing absolutely clear:
I am in no way whatsoever a "helper" of Mr Renner.
I actually believe that he has no need of a "helper" of any kind and I am certainly not acting in the capacity of a "helper" here.
It is rather interesting though to see to what extent the new MM blog seems to be resented by quite a few people here.
I seriously wonder why....
I should have thought that the more media spotlight there is on Maura´s case, the better it is. The conventional media certainly do not seem to be engaging in any kind of "digging" journalism in this respect.
But that´s perhaps the way some of you here onboard would like things to remain???

Eurobserver wrote:

<quoted text>
Snowy,
I take exception to the tone of yours in your rather nasty and insulting comment above. There really is no need for that sort of sniping, is there?
Let me make one thing absolutely clear:
I am in no way whatsoever a "helper" of Mr Renner.
I actually believe that he has no need of a "helper" of any kind and I am certainly not acting in the capacity of a "helper" here.
It is rather interesting though to see to what extent the new MM blog seems to be resented by quite a few people here.
I seriously wonder why....
I should have thought that the more media spotlight there is on Maura´s case, the better it is. The conventional media certainly do not seem to be engaging in any kind of "digging" journalism in this respect.
But that´s perhaps the way some of you here onboard would like things to remain???

again, we know where to look if we're interested in reading and commenting on Renner's blog. updates and interpretation to Topix are unnecessary. your role has changed from "psychic" and promoter of Maura's "sekret boyfriend" to blog pointer.
most insulting has been the partial and mis-information contained on these forums over many years. Team Maura has done a fine job in stomping out interest and turning away ernest assistance to "find" Maura.
it was, and is, a circus.
why so?

I'm in the mood for some wondering out loud.
Kathleen thought Maura was "faking it" to get out of work early. Maura said two words according to Karen M.....she said, "my sister". Maura has two sisters. If she was really upset, it may have been about Julie. If she was trying to get back to her room early, did she stay there?
And why has it always been said that Maura left work closer to 1 AM?
The cellphone bill showed some nearby numbers, a couple of which were called and received often. If Maura left her room, and the building, she'd have to show ID to get back in. I wonder if that happened. Just playing around now with a thought. Has Maura's car been checked to see if there is any hint of Petrits DNA, like a hair or something? She said she wanted to study that night and not go to dunkins. Maybe she went out for coffee and slid into something or someone, and wanted to go ditch the car in NH....nah, it still doesn't make sense that she would email with the excuse of a death in the family. Rozshoem said there was a death, way back in the forums, hey Roz, mind sharing that thought with me? I'm curious how Maura thought she could ever get back into school if the story was ever found out to be false. I think she'd've taken more things if she was going to run away and never come back.
So Roz, who died or what do you mean please.....

Just me wrote:

I'm in the mood for some wondering out loud.
Kathleen thought Maura was "faking it" to get out of work early. Maura said two words according to Karen M.....she said, "my sister". Maura has two sisters.

Or maybe more than two sisters if she belonged to a sorority, especially if she let one of them borrow the Saturn.

rozShoem wrote:

<quoted text>
The "problem" originated in NH. Various organizations, agencies...can dance, prance, toss confetti to the wind or whatever in MA.....but the dirtbag lives in NH.

Not so fast.

A highly respected, well-educated, very smart, and very expensive Massachusetts PI, a PI who, according to himself and long-established investigative procedure, follows only probabilities, not possibilities, interviewed at Hadley MA, during the early afternoon of May 27, 2011 an Amherst/Northampton area resident whom he asked, "Did you kill her?" "Her" referring to Maura.

This PI probably knows more about Maura's disappearance than anyone, including some in law enforcement.

The PI would never have asked the MA resident whether or not he killed Maura if he believed the answer could not have been in the affirmative. In other words, the PI believed there was a reasonable chance that person could have admitted to having killed her. At any rate, the PI, an established expert in behavioral science as it relates to what is popularly called "profiling" would never have wasted his time. In fact, during the interview, he established baseline (check the Reid Interrogation Technique) and then shortly after shot his question out of nowhere. So even if the word mouthed in response to the question was "no," the PI was also checking a host of other answers conveyed as body language.

All this would not have happened if the most knowledgeable person about Maura's disappearance didn't think - or at least wanted to convey the possibility that he thought - a MA resident wasn't involved in Maura's disappearance.

rozShoem wrote:

<quoted text>
The "cover-up" did not occur in MA. The incident occurred in NH and the cover-up has continued in NH. The "something" that occurred after the car crash has prevented several people from coming forth. Why? They are frightened and it seems for very good reason. All of the focus on MA is simply a distraction. She had no plan. One might say that like an unsuspecting rabbit, she simply happened to cross the path of that sly coyote.

Coyote? Surely, you must have meant beagle.

Beagle wrote:

<quoted text>
All this would not have happened if the most knowledgeable person about Maura's disappearance didn't think - or at least wanted to convey the possibility that he thought - a MA resident wasn't involved in Maura's disappearance.

Should have written "or at least want to convey the possibility that he didn't think."

You want people to think I am responsible for Maura's disappearance.

Doing what you've done costs a lot of money, a boatload of money. How many people in the area can pay a bill like that?

You want the public to think I killed her. You want people to believe that I am the dirtbag.

Who are you protecting?

You want to drive me to suicide so it will look like I am guilty. Then you'll declare, "case closed."

You want me to become so alienated from the rest of the world, so thought of as a dirtbag, that I take my own life.

1. Mr L has had an office across the street from Maura's dorm.

2. Mr. L owned a company across the street, Putney Road, from where Tina and Bethany Sinclair were last seen.

3. Mr L, in effect, owned both the bus company, whose driver stopped at the WB curve, and the ambulance company that showed up.

Was someone close to Mr. L involved in Maura's disappearance?

Or was someone close to Mr. K involved?